yea, i think a cumbersnatch is the name of a mythical creature from c.s. lewis.
ps dont watch this video with lesbian virgins in the room.

my thoughts exactly! actually, wut u just said sums up whut i just said.

At 7/2/03 04:53 PM, TomFulp wrote: We are about to launch a new layout for the frontpage. It was designed by Stamper and it is FREAKIN' AWESOME!

Umm, i don't think that i like it very much. plus, if it's not like every other page on the site it just doesnt flow very well from that page to all the others.
you should have asked us, your newgrounders, if we wanted a new lay out. the reason why i dont like it? Not only does it look like the outwar layout, its not black. And i think that newgrounds is best known for its dark humor, and the black is the best color for it.
ty for ur time
austinbowl

Wade Fulp says: "be sure to only vote 0 on entries that break out guidelines or are complete and utter crap that you know the author put no effort into. Also 1 should only be used if an entry is complete and utter crap but has a slight amount of effort put into it and doesn't break any guidelines. 2, 3, 4, and 5 should be used to vote on legit submissions that don't violate any guidelines and have effort put into them, even if you don't like it."
I must say, I disagree. In reality, I ONLY use two numbers when judging Recent Entries: zero and five. I will tell you why.
If the submission is star wars editors cut, which consists of a stick figure being shot, I vote if a zero. When I see that its status is .24, I wonder, “Who the Fuck voted this a 1?” because I deserved a zero. Nevertheless, when I vote zero on many other things (which I consider wastes of bytes), they stick in the portal. BECAUSE PEOPLE VOTE ONE ON IT!!!! And I am the only person who votes zero.
So, I think that there should be only two buttons: a Pass and a Fail. With this new scoring system, Many more entries would be deleted, making more bandwidth space for the better quality ones.
Thank you. Austinbowl

!ti evol I