Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/8/12 10:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:48 PM, Insanctuary wrote: He proves it again and again?

"Judging by my criteria that only I know about and I won't tell anyone what it is"

I'm trying to bring out the best of as many people as I can, so we can look at the bigger picture of our world?

What bigger picture?

RACIST, is that what you really think? That we are all NATURALLY selfish? Where do you get such laughable claims from? Did it ever occur to you that people 'choose' to be ignorant; weak; selfish; etc? We have the ability to be better, but we choose to do the exact opposite because being better.. is completely inconvenient.

I get it from people who do things FOR SCIENCE. And who, you know, actually study brain composition and the chemicals that are released and shit and people who dive into the human phsyche.

See, you keep calling it ignorant and weak. But you won't explain what it is without having the other one in the definition

Why not go down the easy road, right guys? Even though it's an act of weakness, right?

Right. Because it is so easy to be on the BBS "Saving the world" then working your ass off every day so you can party every night

1. Actually.. I have about 8 people who knows this criteria of mine, not because of me, but because they want to make the best out of themselves. They are also quite brilliant, if I do say so myself.

2. You know.. The world, and it's problems.. How humans are seen as harmless when their ideas are twisted and generated out of their ignorance.. The usual big picture that not many people see, or want to see.

3. Yes, and scientists are humans too. They built on an imaginary foundation that was created by labelling our world, and adding value; measurements that didn't actually exist.. Like we can paint an already painted world.. If that is your rolemodel.. You are doomed.

4. I don't see why you have a difficult time seeing that your ignorance, and your weakness spawns from you not becoming a better person that you are right now. You CAN be, but you choose not to be. You wish to stay self-centered, listening to scientists like they have the answers.. convoluting life's nature with your 'facts' that also stems from SCIENCE. While I am doing my grand best to look at everything as a whole, not be selfish or selfless.. To create balance, and add the real pieces of the puzzle together without being bias; objective, and selfish.

5. I'm only 19, I said this a few times already. I am still sojourning for now.. I'm still building this philosophy of mine, and when I feel when I am ready [I can't afford to make any mistakes..] I will do something great with it, because you know.. I actually devote myself to life as a whole, and not selfish intentions.

At 1/8/12 10:43 PM, bgraybr wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:39 PM, Insanctuary wrote: You know it's weak. You know what you are doing is the lesser form of you can do. You choose not to capitalise on your potential. You just let it go to waste, because you take life for granted.

How the fuck would you know that about him?

How, specifically are you not taking life for granted? What makes you better?

I don't mean to randomly but in on your argument but seriously, what are you even trying to say?

He proves it again and again?

I'm trying to bring out the best of as many people as I can, so we can look at the bigger picture of our world?

I don't mind.. It's going to be a bit troublesome trying to respond to both of you with the NG respond limit though.

--

RACIST, is that what you really think? That we are all NATURALLY selfish? Where do you get such laughable claims from? Did it ever occur to you that people 'choose' to be ignorant; weak; selfish; etc? We have the ability to be better, but we choose to do the exact opposite because being better.. is completely inconvenient.

Why not go down the easy road, right guys? Even though it's an act of weakness, right?

At 1/8/12 06:48 PM, VenomKing666 wrote:

At 1/7/12 11:52 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

Live and let live is such a flawed saying.. When people DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THEY LIVE FOR.

Lmfao. Our ignorance is so formidable.. That it devours us whole.

Thus, your 'argument' is not moot. Try to come up with a BETTER argument towards the viability of homosexual relationships.

I like how you criticize my argument claming it is flawed, then failed to point out even a single flaw in it. My argument stands.

So. Your entire statement holds truth because of this quote? ''Live, and let live''? That's basically what you just said. That the quote is 'fact' when it derives from someone who has an opinion how life should be respected and level alone for what it is.. When that is completely ludicrous in the first place. Humans are influences, and they spread like wildfire.

At 1/8/12 10:31 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:29 PM, Insanctuary wrote: It's not about being self-righteous. It's about making the best of any situation; which involves ourselves aswell. Our minds are truly brilliant, and we are able to do incredible things.. Yet this is the best you make out of yourself. *claps*

"It's about making the best of any situation. Except if doing that is something I wouldn't. Then it's bad."

You know it's weak. You know what you are doing is the lesser form of you can do. You choose not to capitalise on your potential. You just let it go to waste, because you take life for granted.

At 1/8/12 10:28 PM, adamflecko wrote: Well, being happy is much more fulfilling than being angry, at least to me it is. Although I haven't truly been happy until recently, I feel a lot better than when I used to.

There is nothing wrong with happiness at a subtle and content level.

There is everything wrong with you rely on happiness to live; as if it was your crutches to stand.

At 1/8/12 10:25 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:21 PM, Insanctuary wrote: No, you do not live the best you are to be. That is blatant enough.

You forgot to put "to my self righteous view" before the last period

It's not about being self-righteous. It's about making the best of any situation; which involves ourselves aswell. Our minds are truly brilliant, and we are able to do incredible things.. Yet this is the best you make out of yourself. *claps*

At 1/8/12 10:21 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:19 PM, Insanctuary wrote: 1. Yet, we are all interconnected in some way shape or form.. Since we influence each other.. So if people live with weak-minds.. Others will live with weak-minds..?

You keep calling it weak minded, but you don't dive into the reasons why, besides "I personally don't do that and I'm better then you so it's weak"

2. Yes, but being weak-minded is the high-life, right? Even when you can be much better than that, right?

It's not being weak minded

When you choose a lesser option over a greater. You are forming a moment where you stand lesser or greater. You guys choose the lesser options because it's more convenient for you. The greater option is alot more inconvenient and takes mental strength to follow through with.

You absolutely think that you are being your best? When you are selfish? When you've set standards? When you are going off of other people's theories; not your own?

It is not that hard to see when something is off about somebody.

At 1/8/12 10:15 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:12 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

It's convenient that only people who make the best out of themselves by your criteria are allowed to have an opinion on what making the best out of themselves actually is.

No, you do not live the best you are to be. That is blatant enough.

At 1/8/12 10:01 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:59 PM, Insanctuary wrote: No. You see. Life is not about not giving a fuck about anything, and just letting nature takes it's course after we just waste away..

Life isn't about anything. It just is. There's no grand purpose, or goal.

That is an act of weakness, and there are reasons as to why they decided to live like this. Which is weak-minded.

That goes off of the assumption that doing what you're raised to do and not just kick back and have fun all of the time makes you any more strong

1. Yet, we are all interconnected in some way shape or form.. Since we influence each other.. So if people live with weak-minds.. Others will live with weak-minds..?

2. Yes, but being weak-minded is the high-life, right? Even when you can be much better than that, right?

At 1/8/12 10:02 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 10:00 PM, Insanctuary wrote: You can.. but choose not to.

Oh yeah, I forgot you were the sole authority on the subject.

No. I'm just making the best out of myself. While you choose not to. It's not that difficult to realise.

At 1/8/12 10:03 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:54 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:40 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:34 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:10 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:19 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:01 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:51 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:43 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

1. No, I admire that you wish to do something with your life, but I do not admire how you make of your life in all actuality. What foundation holds it together.

having family and friend support, having to use money to get where I need to go? Are these the foundations in which you speak of? You type in a circle man, replying and typing statements that are indirect and are difficult to understand without having to ask "what do you mean?" Every five seconds.

2. What he said wasn't very viable.

It is you just have a problem with facts.

3. What if I am telling you what I think? Why do you think it's virtually impossible? When I've found others who make it possible?

Well the world looks the same to me, and I love to see how that works out for you thirty years from now when the world will still be the same.

. Everything I am saying, a good 95% is self-taught. This is why my grammar is subpar, and my execution is atleast college level.

Yeah, ok.

My performance does not define my wisdom. It's what my performance defines.

You wouldn't be this way if it were not for outside influences (Your mom and dad) don't be a hypocrite.

1. Deeper flaws, as in things that are off.

2. His brain said so, therefore it's fact? Really?

No I'm talking about human nature.

3. What makes you think that?

Because like I said before you have yet to made any impact on the world

4. We both know that I am just generally speaking.

5. Which is why I told you to not let substantial influences.. As you can see, this entire argument spawns from my mind.. Not my parents. Yours is being supported by a convoluted sense of 'logic'.

I never said your parents influence would formulate 100% into who you are. But they do take a large role in it. You would've never tookin an interest in education were it not for your parents. You would've never tookin an interest in some of your hobbies were it not for parents/school. Philosophy wouldn't have been an interest if some one or something didn't expose you to it.

In short: You're effected by outside influences as much as anyone else.

2. Ok. Let's recap. What do YOU personally think human nature is?

3. I'm only 19, I'm sojourning in the shadows until I am ready.

4. You won't believe me if I told you, but a head injury during age 16 1/2 allowed me to compose music; write philosophy, and think critically. I'm not even sure why. I even have 3 months of nothingness because of that head injury. I just have a memory of me lying down in bed and it's like.. I woke up from a deep sleep, like my body was on auto-pilot for 3 months.

I digress.. On that.

At 1/8/12 09:58 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:44 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:40 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:39 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

Dawh, I'm more special then 7 billion people

You can.. but choose not to.

At 1/8/12 09:50 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:48 PM, Insanctuary wrote: So you admit to defeatism? Since, well, you choose to waste away?

That's not an acceptance of defeat, considering they have different end goals.

No. You see. Life is not about not giving a fuck about anything, and just letting nature takes it's course after we just waste away..

That is an act of weakness, and there are reasons as to why they decided to live like this. Which is weak-minded.

At 1/8/12 09:40 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:34 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:10 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:19 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:01 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:51 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:43 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

1. No, I admire that you wish to do something with your life, but I do not admire how you make of your life in all actuality. What foundation holds it together.

having family and friend support, having to use money to get where I need to go? Are these the foundations in which you speak of? You type in a circle man, replying and typing statements that are indirect and are difficult to understand without having to ask "what do you mean?" Every five seconds.

:: : :

2. What he said wasn't very viable.

It is you just have a problem with facts.

3. What if I am telling you what I think? Why do you think it's virtually impossible? When I've found others who make it possible?

Well the world looks the same to me, and I love to see how that works out for you thirty years from now when the world will still be the same.

. Everything I am saying, a good 95% is self-taught. This is why my grammar is subpar, and my execution is atleast college level.

Yeah, ok.

My performance does not define my wisdom. It's what my performance defines.

You wouldn't be this way if it were not for outside influences (Your mom and dad) don't be a hypocrite.

1. Deeper flaws, as in things that are off.

2. His brain said so, therefore it's fact? Really?

3. What makes you think that?

4. We both know that I am just generally speaking.

5. Which is why I told you to not let substantial influences.. As you can see, this entire argument spawns from my mind.. Not my parents. Yours is being supported by a convoluted sense of 'logic'.

At 1/8/12 09:39 PM, Stretchysumo wrote: I don't give a fuck about the state of the world. One day, I'm going to die, so I might as well enjoy the ride. I'm content to be useless to the human race.

So you admit to defeatism? Since, well, you choose to waste away?

At 1/8/12 09:40 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 09:39 PM, Insanctuary wrote: 'Making the best out of now'. What you deem as 'best' is not the 'best'.

I forgot, that jobs up to you

No. It's a job anyone can do, but choose not to do.

At 1/8/12 09:14 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:52 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Why does humanity persist on worrying about why we are here, in the entire existence of the human race, when we need to make the best out of now?

Wait a second, I thought you were all against living for the moment?

'Making the best out of now'. What you deem as 'best' is not the 'best'.

At 1/8/12 09:10 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:19 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:01 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:51 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:43 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

1. No, I admire that you wish to do something with your life, but I do not admire how you make of your life in all actuality. What foundation holds it together.

having family and friend support, having to use money to get where I need to go? Are these the foundations in which you speak of? You type in a circle man, replying and typing statements that are indirect and are difficult to understand without having to ask "what do you mean?" Every five seconds.

2. So now our human race is speaking on the behalf of nature?

What Racist Bassist said.

3. Right now, I am passionately reasoning.. and getting an idea what you guys think. Stop trying to relate my passion to this site as if they were absolutely relatable.

Were telling you what we think, and you blow our opinions off as ignorant and close minded as if people most people strive to reach for this virtually impossible goal. You need to be more down to earth, preaching about why you think the world is shit isn't going to change anything.

4. This thread is only pointless to you, because you are throwing this out of proportion.

No because you can't back up how your making such a huge impact to "save the world." Besides telling me you read philosophy. And you've long since blown this thread out of proportion when you started playing GOD. Am I just suppose to believe some guy can just change the world because he THINKS he understands more about it than most of the human race?

Honestly what kind of reactions did you expect to get? Did you not take this into consideration?

1. No. I'm speaking of deeper flaws that you barely notice consciously. I'm sorry that I can't draw a map for you. My mind is so full of interesting ideas that I have trouble transferring unto the real world. I put alot of endeavor, I really do. Some people get it. Alot of people don't.

2. What he said wasn't very viable.

3. What if I am telling you what I think? Why do you think it's virtually impossible? When I've found others who make it possible?

4. What am I saying that deems your side of the argument any better? This isn't about who is right or wrong anymore. This is about our standards of life, and how you guys have very low standards.. under the impression science has given you.. and choose to not speak with your own genuine minds without any substantial outside influences.. Everything I am saying, a good 95% is self-taught. This is why my grammar is subpar, and my execution is atleast college level.

My performance does not define my wisdom. It's what my performance defines.

At 1/8/12 09:02 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote: 1. Who said?

The brain.

2. Unique? You don't seem to understand what I mean when I say that a flawed man has a flawed vision.

That you place way too much focus on the character of the opponent instead of, you know, the actual topic?

3. It was a metaphor.

That falls short.

4. How am I a retard? Simply because you are caught up in the wrong web of life?

It was a figure of speech. What I'm saying is this, if you know you're ignorant, why do you assume everyone else is?

5. Why would I stop and think if you both haven't done anything but assume things of me; twist my words; act like your argument is better than mine when your argument spawns from this world's idealism, which is a giant ass of a contradiction, I assure you.

My argument doesn't stem from idealism, yours does. Mine stems from the world being a train going on the same track as you and the tracks have several dozen high feet of walls on both side. Yeah, you can try to climb out or try to run. Me? I'd rather grab my lawn chair and toast the train then get drunk.

6. I wasn't being literal?

I was?

7. That your vision is infected with tunnel vision?

"Everyone else is blind but me, because I can't see that they are able to see" -Says the guy with no eyes.

8. You chose to do it; which represents you chose a feeble option over a greater option that was too inconvenient for you.

Wait, make up your mind. Either I'm a slave or I make bad choices on my own volition. Which one is it?

9. Is that really part of your argument? You are all individual minds. You are contributing to my philosophy.

That does not contribute to your philosophy.

10. Go back, and find it. It does.

"10. Saving the human race so I can redeem my will; life is not my motive. I see flaws in this world, and I simply wish to make sense out of them; to put an end to it."

"9. What is my motive in my alterior motive? Why would I have an alteria motive? This motive of mine is essentially life itself."

11. Yet, nobody has seen or heard of God, therefore God exists. I haven't seen anything reasonable out of your argument, therefore your arguments stands?

DEAR GOD ARE YOU DENSE.

I purposely used the God example to point out the ridiculousness of your logic.

12. The root of all problems is the human race. What am I arguing with currently? This is not what I do all of the time. If you haven't noticed, I signed up in 2010.

And what problems are you talking of?

Oh, yeah, that's right, problems that always have and always will repeat themselves. The only difference is we have turf wars with guns over shit like Religion instead of fruit with teeth.

Congrats, you discovered the site later.

Wait, I don't use the BBS all of the time, I only discovered it in 2004.

13. No. This world is consisted of fools, and fools who call others fools. Then, you see people who can't stand on their thin ice, while people like me are unable to be phased by your so called 'argument' that stems from a completely imaginative 'logic'.

And what makes your logic any less imaginative? You're a stranger to your own words.

14. Of course it does. Look at religious people, and look at their character. It's a match!

Uh, what. Please explain the relevance. You don't bash the concept of religion for the actions of the followers.

15. This is exactly why your argument gets trumped. You are supporting your claims with 'facts' derived from science.

Troll confirmed.

16. Our sentience has nothing to do with your deluded sense of life.

Lol what. I never said it did. And how the fuck did you get that out of that?

17. 'Stranger to your own words' means that you don't even see what you are actually saying.

Oh. So basically the classic "You don't know what you're talking about" line that people pull when they are confused as fuck and realize the other person is actually right. Another favorite of mine is "You're young, what do you know"

18. That is not troll logic. You practically implied it. People call me arrogant because they don't want to be more than they are now, because it's too unconventional for their standards.

No, people call you arrogant because of classics like "I am carrying a heavy burden on my back and my task is to save mankind, and I can do it"

19. Meaning.. That there is no such thing as perfection. Imperfection is the foundation of what appears to be perfect.

Wait, I think you seriously fucked up the numbering by getting rid of the parts of my post that you couldn't respond to.

20. How are we irrelevant?

Well, we are pretty fucking insignificant in the grand scheme of things. We're but the blink of an eye to the universe.

1. Really? Your brain? That is how you deem what you deem nature as fact?

2. Trust me, I do focus on everything all-around. The main target is your flaws. They are what weakens everything else for me.

3. No, basically. I was saying that you guys suck away the life of things for your personal gain, and choose to not contribute in any way; esp. when you are actually relying on your selfish nature, and selfish intentions to fuel your side of the argument. That the light is your inevitable doom you are drawn towards.. That your brains are friend from your ignorance of the 'light'.

4. Simply because nobody knows everything? It's the fact that I am more aware than you are of this world?

5. That's why you are using science to back of your view of life. *claps*

6. Because?

7. What do you see, that I do not see?

8. That's generally you taking everything I say at face value. You are a slave to your own mind, and still choose feeble options because of it.

9. Trust me. It is.

10a./10b. Two different things like I said.

11. I purposely used it against you.

12. So you believe that the actions of the human race is right only because it's always been this way? Is that your logic?

13. Where are my flaws, tell me. You see, this argument isn't about who is right or wrong anymore. It's about you being selfish; ignorant, and me stating that it doesn't do you any good.

14. I was generally scoffing at you and them. Saying that they are just as ridiculous as their belief system.

15. What? Science is built on this imaginary foundation you call 'logic'.

16. You are saying that we are sentient right now through your polluted eyes. Which is wrong.

17. No, it's much more deeper than that mate. I'm basically saying that you are no different than a religious person. Circling around their 'facts' and how their science/scripts prove your statement. When it's all smoke and mirrors.

18. I'm simply expressing how I currently feel. Don't take it so literal.

19. I think I did, and I apologise.

20. The universe isn't any more significant than we are. You are just polluted by your shared view of this world with the school of thoughts scientists created out of straws and flaws. There is no value. There is no standards. There is nothing as much as you think there is. Scientists only discover things, and record things.. They never know exactly what they are doing.. It's just them creating imaginary labels and measurements to make our world a bit more convenient.. It never actually existed..

Yes, but you ask yourself.. WHAT influences these kids so horribly?

At 1/8/12 08:14 PM, TrevorW wrote: So the logic its self isn't flawed, so much as the way people apply it? Perhaps most people aren't critical thinkers and fall into logical falicies? I think this is what you are saying.

You are getting the idea.

Better question: Why does humanity care so much why we are here if we are destroying everything in the process?

Why does humanity cares so much how they are here if the answer itself still wouldn't constitute anything afterwards?

Why does humanity persist on worrying about why we are here, in the entire existence of the human race, when we need to make the best out of now?

Why does humanity insist on explaining what they can't explain with ridiculous explanations they can't explain?

At 1/8/12 08:13 PM, Haggard wrote: And here I was thinking that this thread could easily be ended by saying that Happiness is a warm gun.

Also, feelings are part of human nature. "Nature" is a thing that you cannot change over night.

Also also, a thread that starts with the quote

Why can't we simply just live? Is 'happiness' truly that important to you?

How can you live without happiness (or any other feelings). And even more important: WHY do you want to do that? To me a life withouth feelings (ie happiness) is not worth living. Because... really, what's left in a life where you don't feel happy?

I think I regret not explaining why I typed it like this 'happiness', because apparently people cannot see that there is something about that specific happiness that I question.

There is nothing wrong with happiness; only if this happiness becomes your crutches.

I already stated plenty of times I don't want to make us all grey. That is taking what I said out of context.

I have a special girl in my life, I am happy to a point of being content. I don't pursue for happiness. It comes to me as I live to be the best I can be.

At 1/8/12 08:24 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 08:19 PM, Insanctuary wrote: 1. No, I admire that you wish to do something with your life, but I do not admire how you make of your life in all actuality. What foundation holds it together.

Ok Mr. Superior Morality, tell me all about how much better then us you are

2. So now our human race is speaking on the behalf of nature?

Of its own nature, yes

3. Right now, I am passionately reasoning.. and getting an idea what you guys think. Stop trying to relate my passion to this site as if they were absolutely relatable.

You're passionately reasoning yeah, but you're doing it with insane troll and circular types of logic.

4. This thread is only pointless to you, because you are throwing this out of proportion.

Wait what, the person who doesn't think they're going to save mankind and that they have a huge burden having to tell RacistBassist why he's wrong when he's really right on the internet is the one not blowing it out of proportion?

1. I'm not better than you. What do you not comprehend?

2. No, you are filling in the blanks with straws. Stop it. What you are doing is an act of weakness. Nothing more, nothing less.

3. How? It's kind of hard to convince a wall that pretends to be a somebody that is it indeed a wall.

4. Now you think you are right? How do you come to that laughable conclusion? Where at all did you defeat my argument? Let alone.. Display your own mindful argument.. not what you were deluded into seeing as logical.

1. Who said?

2. Unique? You don't seem to understand what I mean when I say that a flawed man has a flawed vision.

3. It was a metaphor.

4. How am I a retard? Simply because you are caught up in the wrong web of life?

5. Why would I stop and think if you both haven't done anything but assume things of me; twist my words; act like your argument is better than mine when your argument spawns from this world's idealism, which is a giant ass of a contradiction, I assure you.

6. I wasn't being literal?

7. That your vision is infected with tunnel vision?

8. You chose to do it; which represents you chose a feeble option over a greater option that was too inconvenient for you.

9. Is that really part of your argument? You are all individual minds. You are contributing to my philosophy.

10. Go back, and find it. It does.

11. Yet, nobody has seen or heard of God, therefore God exists. I haven't seen anything reasonable out of your argument, therefore your arguments stands?

12. The root of all problems is the human race. What am I arguing with currently? This is not what I do all of the time. If you haven't noticed, I signed up in 2010.

13. No. This world is consisted of fools, and fools who call others fools. Then, you see people who can't stand on their thin ice, while people like me are unable to be phased by your so called 'argument' that stems from a completely imaginative 'logic'.

14. Of course it does. Look at religious people, and look at their character. It's a match!

15. This is exactly why your argument gets trumped. You are supporting your claims with 'facts' derived from science.

16. Our sentience has nothing to do with your deluded sense of life.

17. 'Stranger to your own words' means that you don't even see what you are actually saying.

18. That is not troll logic. You practically implied it. People call me arrogant because they don't want to be more than they are now, because it's too unconventional for their standards.

19. Meaning.. That there is no such thing as perfection. Imperfection is the foundation of what appears to be perfect.

20. How are we irrelevant?

At 1/8/12 08:01 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:51 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:43 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:06 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

7. The problem is that we are deluded by our own selfish pursuits. We are deluded by our ego. We are deluded by what we see; and how we choose to see it; since, well, alot of you don't give a flying fuck about anything but yourself, and a few exceptions. The solution is to become a better person, which is too inconvenient for you.

Thats what makes us human like racist bassist stated were not robots that consider each other on an equal plain-field. We have our own unique life experiences, personality, and variosu ideals of happiness. Stop acting like your above human nature because YOU-ARE-NOT.

What annoys me the most is that you've act like you've done something so moving and awe inspiring and rant about it like some bitter WWII veteran. Which is why I and many others say you're a pretentious deluded fool. If you don't have some plan to change our society then you don't have the any valid reasons to bitch and moan about it. Take some action in this "master plan" of yours then come back and try again.

I never said I was higher than you? Where do you keep getting that impression? I can't help but appear to be superior of you are not making the best out of yourselves.

Because the way to type your twisted ideals imply that.

A plan? This isn't some kind of goal; mission that is being carried out by me. It's simply me opposing against the root of all problems; the human race.

By reading up on philosophy and bitching about the human race on the forums? Yeah a valiant effort, this thread is pointless.

1. No, I admire that you wish to do something with your life, but I do not admire how you make of your life in all actuality. What foundation holds it together.

2. So now our human race is speaking on the behalf of nature?

3. Right now, I am passionately reasoning.. and getting an idea what you guys think. Stop trying to relate my passion to this site as if they were absolutely relatable.

4. This thread is only pointless to you, because you are throwing this out of proportion.

At 1/8/12 07:58 PM, Xyphon202 wrote: Hi everyone. I think none of you should seek out happiness in life. I mean, happiness won't make you happy, so what's the point? Amirite? Also, instead of seeking out happiness we should seek out expanding as a human race. Yeah, we won't live to see the day where we make a big difference, but whatever, the life of people who you will never know far outweighs the life of yourself. We have to make OTHER people happy, that's the only solution. Happiness is pointless, so let's make others happy.

Oh yeah, by the way, you are all wrong because I don't like you.

Case closed guys, thread over. I am superior to you all, so fuck off. Why are you still here? I said fuck off.

^what I'm seeing in this thread

1. I feel as though you take my word too far into your 'context'. I told you not to take what I say at face value.

2. I'm just trying to point out that we can be so much better than we are now. You 'choose' to be the lesser.

At 1/8/12 07:18 PM, TrevorW wrote: You still have no explained the mechanics of how you think. You have disagreed with ideas but you have yet to detail HOW you think. Why are things what they are? How are they? What makes you make your conclusions?

Logic and reasoning are methods. You have disagreed with conclusions.

I'm a critical thinker. I see everything as puzzle pieces. Even when I eat my food. I see puzzle pieces. Everything, even human beings. I see puzzle pieces.. I don't know how else to explain it.

I just never take anything for face value. I look at something for the thing of itself. When I speak to people, their bodies aren't even my concern.. I look straight in their eyes, and I see them.. Every word they speak, how they react.. It just draws this map I understand.. I don't know how to explain it, mate.

My mind is able to put things together, and I can feel it putting things together. I see quick images.. Sometimes it just dawns on me.. It's like my mind is able to put things together along with my conscious piecing together along with my philosophy.

It's hard to explain this, mate. :/

At 1/8/12 07:43 PM, II2none wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:51 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 06:06 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

7. The problem is that we are deluded by our own selfish pursuits. We are deluded by our ego. We are deluded by what we see; and how we choose to see it; since, well, alot of you don't give a flying fuck about anything but yourself, and a few exceptions. The solution is to become a better person, which is too inconvenient for you.

Thats what makes us human like racist bassist stated were not robots that consider each other on an equal plain-field. We have our own unique life experiences, personality, and variosu ideals of happiness. Stop acting like your above human nature because YOU-ARE-NOT.

What annoys me the most is that you've act like you've done something so moving and awe inspiring and rant about it like some bitter WWII veteran. Which is why I and many others say you're a pretentious deluded fool. If you don't have some plan to change our society then you don't have the any valid reasons to bitch and moan about it. Take some action in this "master plan" of yours then come back and try again.

'That's what makes us human'. Who are you define what human nature is? It sounds to me that you only try to pretend this is what human life is because it allows you to continue being weak-minded; reluctant; careless; flawed, and not give a fuck about much of anything in the fruitless pursuit.

I never said I was higher than you? Where do you keep getting that impression? I can't help but appear to be superior of you are not making the best out of yourselves.

A plan? This isn't some kind of goal; mission that is being carried out by me. It's simply me opposing against the root of all problems; the human race.

At 1/8/12 07:12 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 1/8/12 07:08 PM, Insanctuary wrote: There is a difference between the person, their belief system, and the person's flaws.

Attacking a persons flaws is the same as attacking the person

You are calling me stupid?

Yes. You are very stupid. I truly wish that somewhere in your past somebody had done something right and didn't try to teach you that you were some super special unique being and that humanity needs saving and you'll do the job, or at the very least teaching you not to act morally superior

1. No. The flaws are not of the person. The person as a whole is irrelevant to the pieces of them that I target. Since flaws aren't even a part of them.

2. I'm very stupid? Sure, let's go with that. You're the one who is forming an argument out of your selfish endeavors, standards and what you deem valuable in life, which is certaintly an act of weakness mind you.