Be a Supporter!
Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 19th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/19/14 07:03 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: InsanitaryTowel
such deep wow

Did you lose a kidney from sweating so much while thinking of one for my name? I know you can do better than that.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 19th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/19/14 06:23 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: your analogies make me cringe

your genesis;

burn genesis.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 19th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/19/14 01:39 AM, Warforger wrote: Like I said, you "enlightened fellows" are a dime a dozen and keep showing up randomly. Debating your argument (which was done on the first page) is fruitless because you don't know how to debate. You respond to criticism with hostility, calls for evidence with insults. We did debate your argument, the problem is that there's no point because you don't like too debate people.
Lol wut? Now you're back tracking. Who is the one who literally didn't respond to half my post? Oh right it was you.

Truth is is that I was in fact replying to your post, then I realized I'm just wasting my time and I might as well get to the part that I'm really interested in.
No, it's just you guys keep popping up here and I'm just wondering what you're mindset is, what you guys hope to achieve. Do you guys go on here to gather support or do you go on here to gather hostility to claim you're oppressed or something? You don't argue any particular point, you don't create sound arguments yet you act like you do. On top of this all that happens is you start to break down emotionally. It's just bizarre.

"We did debate your argument" - that's why you kept asking stupid questions; ignoring points; making this about me; acting like you understood a drop of this debate, right? You can't fool me with your blanket statements and red herrings - I eat red herrings for breakfast, while snuggled in a blanket statement.

Sweeping generalizations; especially when I have provided points you ignore and continue to ask for proof, when the proof is right there; then when I call you out on it, you try to argue ethics with the government, of all things.

Remember, since the beginning when you initiated your keyboard warrior turn-based - oh wait, never mind; I can't play turn base with anyone that hasn't made a move yet. Questions, red herrings, "you this, you that; instead of why this, why that", asking for proof and arguments when they are right under your nose, is not making a move - unless you count shifting in the chair to pass gas as movement, then sure have a technical.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 10:21 PM, Warforger wrote:
At 6/18/14 07:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Do you really want to start this with me? The dots are right before your eyes. There's no ethics in this - because anyone that says otherwise is not human enough to argue human relations. This is hypocrisy, consequential and only behaves negatively and positively to those that are taking, not giving. Life is supposed to be perpetual, mutual and relative - this is everything but!
Christ do you not hear how stupid you sound? Anyone who does not agree with you is either stupid or evil? You keep using words and idiomatic expressions without understanding their meaning, you keep saying random things in some jumbled statement against Corporatism, in the end it's just some guy on the internet rambling without maintaining a coherent thought, getting angry when people don't agree with him and relying on personal attacks and logical fallacies to repudiate.

You know in some ways you're even more delusional than past posters of this type, at least they tried to provide SOME evidence or at least would state the importance of evidence.

In the end I'm reminded of the Apologetic explanation for Atheists, that they actually believe in God it's just that they're mad at him for something because EVERYONE really believes in God it's just they repress their belief because they're evil, sad, stupid or mentally ill. It's ridiculous circular logic.

Still making it about me, and not the argument.

Did I make you crap your big boy pants that you have to go off on me, after I gave you a great number of points for you to address?

Nothing you said has any relevance to the points. Go back to them and address each one with more of your non-relevant responses, just because you never had anything to say, and just pretend you are making a difference, Mr. keyboard warrior.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 07:29 PM, Warforger wrote: But you're not doing that. You see what you're talking about is ethics, if you knew much about it you would know words like Utilitarianism or Immanuel Kant. The issue here is that these people/ideas question what is right and what is wrong, they open things up for discussion, what you're doing is making some position and then lashing out at anyone who disagree's. You're just using that as a shield against criticism, everyone against you is some braindead drone that can't see the light and "connect the dots".

I'd love to see you be a Lawyer

You :This person is guilty and this is why....

Judge: Ummm ok do you have any evidence for that?

You: YOU FUCKING MORON HOW CAN YOU NOT CONNECT THE GODDAMN DOTS! EVIDENCE IS BIASED ANYWAY AND MAKES INNOCENT PEOPLE GO TO JAIL AND GUILTY PEOPLE FREE! CAN'T YOU SEE OR ARE YOU JUST TOO GODDAMN STUPID?!!?

Do you really want to argue ethics on a government that expects its people to work, just to ship our jobs over seas for cheaper labor, then expect us to work our lives, to the point both the husband and wife have to work, which is why day cares exist, so people can support their life barely, unless you go to the military or get a student loan, both designed to fuck people over financially/socially (military can draft your children), just so they can raise their debt ceiling, steal money from china, while also thinking they can conjure a billion $ coin to pay off the debt.

Do you really want to start this with me? The dots are right before your eyes. There's no ethics in this - because anyone that says otherwise is not human enough to argue human relations. This is hypocrisy, consequential and only behaves negatively and positively to those that are taking, not giving. Life is supposed to be perpetual, mutual and relative - this is everything but!

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 09:00 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: Wait I think I get what he's getting at
-the government wants us to get jobs but they bailout and give tax breaks to corporations that not only lobby for them but also outsource shit overseas. The rich are only getting richer while others either descend or get stuck in limbo.

That's what's I think he's getting at its a move to get people stuck in limbo living a fantasy that everything all right.

Basically this. But there's more "meat" on those bones that you forgot, like the payout bias towards those that do nothing, and those that put their lives on the line to support those that do nothing.

At 6/18/14 06:51 AM, Shade wrote: You are correct, your baffling political ideology and your love of hypocrisy are not grandiose delusions. They're just fucking weird.

You're right. Being that "one person" (in that rarely is there one man, and not an army) that fights with their life for the sake of knowing what is wrong and what is right, from those that sit on their asses letting it all happen, believing their only means of life is eating shitting and fucking, is most definitely bizarre.

According to this, you believe yourself to be omnipotent.

Please, explain.

Omnipotent? Me? No, I know nothing - it's my brain that is omnipotent (everyone's brain is omnipotent). No man unlocks it all, but the brain has it all - hands down. It would not be possible if we weren't another piece of the Universe in a form based on what is called "self-similarity". However we are the Universe experiencing itself through our "human" experience, which is merely based off of subatomic particles, electromagnetic waves and so on, which I can prove tremendously well by demonstrating that sociopaths go unpunished because they are the "human" form of a "black hole", while empaths are noticeable because they still send off electromagnetic waves (the heart does it by the way). This is why the bully is never punished, while the victim is. The victim still sends of signals that cause people to react - the sociopath is the Universe inverted on itself, causing a black hole that devours and hungers for all that is not itself.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 04:44 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: sounds like a you problem

enjoy your thread kid :)

*ignores their own mistakes after acting like one dictionary source was an argument*

Stay classy.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 04:23 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: If that is the case then you are not qualified to accuse people of taking things "out of context" unless you clearly state the context in which you are using a certain word. Which you never do.

You couldn't figure that out ahead of time for yourself? You really think that this isn't your blind-sided spite working, after somehow convincing yourself that one dictionary source somehow held every single word in human history? What about the ancient words that aren't used anymore? What about dictionaries that cover different parts of human communication? Did not think that clearly, when you were too busy condescending me, were you?

Because as a thinking human I am prepared to concede that consumer-capitalism in a democratic society, despite its faults, is the best we've come up with so far.

Oh really? That's why Capitalism does not follow the principle: You reap what you sow, huh? It does not give - it takes. That's why it's eroding. It has no sense of human relation - it's all cold machine like trade with no regard for the people's well-being. Oh look at that, I already demonstrated one of the reasons why it's failing... Do I have to demonstrate much more?

I'm like the Mindtanic, and yur the Ice Burge...
if that was meant to be a Titanic analogy, are you not aware that the Titanic crashed, broke in half and sank?
Kind of like what all your threads do

I was referring to before it crashed. You're this cold rock that just waits and waits - I'm this wonderful ship that is simply trying to get from one place to another and you end up being my obstacle.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 04:03 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: Whether "most people" use them one way or another has no bearing on their actual definitions and whether or not they are synonyms.

There's more than one dictionary, for fuck's sake. I swear, I'm like the Mindtanic, and yur the Ice Burge...

Stop making this complicated.
You make things complicated for yourself in virtue of the fact that you routinely use words that you don't know the meanings of.

By all means, feel free to drop this "synonym" talk and go back to explaining your brilliant alternative to government.
Oh wait, you can't. Because you have nothing new to say now, just as you had nothing new to say two years ago.

It's funny how that's your way of thinking. Because I'm very aware of idiots that can't think, so what they do is, they place all of the burden on the other person they think they know so much better than. Why don't you come up with system? If you go through that thread - I repeatedly explain I am not trying to make a solution, I am just wanting to debate on the issue, which idiots don't want to because it's too big for their tiny simulations they've created to preserve their lack of character.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 03:48 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: stupid and ignorant are not synonyms which is why "ignorant" does not appear on this page of synonyms for stupid.

Yet most people use them interchangeably in reality, just like the term dumb and stupid. Even though dumb was actually a term based on people that couldn't speak.

Stop making this complicated. I know I am correct here.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 03:37 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: equivalent in meaning

I think the best lesson you stand to learn from this is that you shouldn't use words if you aren't prepared to spend ten seconds learning their meanings

Synonymous =/= Same

Here's an example, since you want to make things complicated.

Stupid/Ignorant - Synonyms, yet they mean two different things that share close relations. Capitalism and Trade share close relations.

At 6/18/14 03:36 AM, Shade wrote: Just how long have you been off of your medications? You seem to have some serious Grandiose Delusions.

I'm not a doctor or a psychologist, but you should probably see one.

Or several.

This is not grandiose you idiot:

A. The government expects their people to have jobs, yet they continue to demonstrate hypocrisy by shipping them off over the seas.

B. The government expects us to work for money, while they sit on their asses playing monopoly god.

C. The government treats our financial issues like we should be responsible, while they steal money from China and keep raising the debt ceiling/ asking to create an imaginary billion dollar coin to erase the debt with china.

Address the points.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 03:22 AM, yurgenburgen wrote:
except for your repeated claims that trade and capitalism were synonymous

Yes, and my repeated explanations that people continue to pull out of context, that synonymous does not equate "same".

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 02:37 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: the thread speaks for itself

I suppose the difference between you and I is that I don't need to call you an idiot for you to look like one; you're more than willing to do it to yourself

I reread through some of it, and I can say that you're a very facetious, spiteful fellow.

First off - I show no signs of misunderstanding Capitalism. What really happened was, I did not do well at separating trade and capitalism in my OP at that time, which I admitted to as you can see, therefore I'm not an idiot when I can admit to being wrong.

Oh, and here's a CIVIL conversation between you and I where you clearly don't seem to think of me as an idiot:

Me -The people who put people to work, while they made profit off of their labour.

You- Okay.

Me - The problem was not trade. The problem was the fear of our world being owned by nobody.

You - Meaningless.

Me - I'm suggesting that before this world became too complicated,

You - I presume you're referring to pre-capitalist society at this point. (look at this, you're clearly demonstrating that I knew about Capitalism, by saying I was referring to pre-Capitalism).

Me - there would a forked path we could've taken that did not resort to fictional values and humans being exchanged for labour and commodities.

You - Unfortunately the industrial revolution and the explosion of capitalism was necessary for us to be able to form a good understanding of economics and the implications of the collectivisation of labour.
Now that we have an understanding of this, you're welcome to educate yourself and theorise an alternative to capitalism that hasn't already been tried dozens of times in the past with disastrous results.
You keep alluding to this idea that "we could be doing something else". Well, what?
What are you suggesting? What is your brilliant alternative?

As you can see, you're making a mountain out of a mole hill, friend. We were actually discussing - I also do remember liking you for some time until you showed no signs of being reasonable and kept trashing my threads with your spite towards me for reasons I really am starting to think that even you don't even realize, because again, that conversation we had in that thread was very civil and we were addressing each other's points.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 18th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/18/14 01:51 AM, Shade wrote: No, I'm here because you seem to believe that you're some enlightened genius in a crowd of sheeple and your delusions amuse me greatly.

That's why the same ideas I have been working on for all these years happens to be the same ideas that Tesla was working on himself, right? That's why I can figure things out with my brain before researching it and finding out I was 100% correct, if not expansive on the subject due to how much knowledge I have over people and this Universe as per the concept of oneness and being able to break down everything down to the subatomic form with little to no effort, right?

Don't envy me - challenge me.

At 6/18/14 01:33 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: about two years ago he made a thread very similair in tone to this one, except it was about capitalism.
as the thread played out in typical insanctuary style it turned out that he didn't actually know what "capitalism" was, but he felt he was somehow fit to be the instigator of a better alternative.
he still hasn't dreamed up an alternative, despite having had two years to go about it, and he still genuinely thinks that the drivel he comes out with is anything other than old news

You're an idiot if you still agree with those idiots that took things out of context to make it look like I didn't understand capitalism, when I understood trade and how it works, while they did not understand the hypocrisy, like now as demonstrated and as you can see, I'm the one with points here - I am the one that isn't stupid here that think "lel, old issues, must mean we should not worry about it, EVEN THOUGH IT CAUSES NEW ISSUES".

At 6/18/14 01:15 AM, Warforger wrote: See that's the thing, you're just acting like the idiot. We're trying to discuss your points and idea's and all you're doing is laughing and shaking your head. This is the thing that irks me about you type of posters, do you even understand or comprehend what an intelligent conversation is? What free thinking is? What evidence is? How you can read what you're posting and not be blasted away by the hypocrisy is just what irks me the most.

You don't even comprehend the points:

A. The government expects their people to have jobs, yet they continue to demonstrate hypocrisy by shipping them off over the seas.

B. The government expects us to work for money, while they sit on their asses playing monopoly god.

C. The government treats our financial issues like we should be responsible, while they steal money from China and keep raising the debt ceiling/ asking to create an imaginary billion dollar coin to erase the debt with china.

So my friend, I am not the one laughing here. I'm very serious about this. You have no points. All you do is ask stupid questions, then you ignore the points that I don't even need to give you when they are so globally accessible if you just do your fucking research, while during all of this, you clearly have shown that you know nothing of the real world and get your information from the media.

Response to: This theory gives me migraines... Posted June 18th, 2014 in Writing

At 6/17/14 10:19 PM, TheGypsyBard wrote: Sadly, I am not. I know only the bare minimum needed when he was covered in history class.

Research Tesla and the Fibonacci Sequence.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 11:25 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: THESE WOOOOUUUNNDSS THEY WILLLLLL POTAAAATOOOOOO

"When the true seeker of wisdom
hears of the mysterious powers of the warriors
he feels compelled to study them activerly
When the ordinary man hears of those teachings
he discusses them with other intellects.
When the idiot hears of the teachings,
he smirks and laughs and shakes his head."

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 11:09 PM, Korriken wrote: Just ignore him, he's clearly angry that he has to find a part time job to continue getting his benefits.

People should ignore all three of you because you ignore government hypocrisy; think "old news" is legitimate enough to neglect and ignore old issues, even though they cause new issues, and only disrespect anyone that already suffered from it and long passed away; then on top of that, you either ask stupid questions because you have to say something like a child always needs that last word; you ridicule me, and not the government's hypocrisy; you then try to pass it off like I'm the worthless poster, after all of the above.

Despicable.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 10:36 PM, orangebomb wrote: So far, I can tell that the OP has not only no idea what he is talking about, but has a habit of either dodging questions or repeating the same unsourced spiel over and over again. It's honestly tiring to hear the same old "government is taking away our X for whatever reason" crap when there is sufficient enough evidence that say otherwise that isn't completely biased or hearsay from someone gasbag with no integrity, David Icke and Alex Jones are 2 prominent examples.

Considering how the OP is too busy insulting people's intelligence instead of doing simple fact-checking, this conversation shouldn't last much longer.

I'm not a conspiracy theory - I am a human being. If you don't see how the laws and the businesses are more important than the people, then you sir are the idiot.

At 6/17/14 10:23 PM, Warforger wrote: I'm starting to think you don't know that much about the IRS scandal. The IRS scandal was where members of the IRS were attacking Conservative groups and going after them much more than they were left wing groups. I'm not sure how that fits into your argument.

Oh, it couldn't be signs of corruption! Even if it's old, it's still corruption - and the fact that it still exists doesn't mean people should say "oh, old news"; people should be ashamed that they let it happen for so long.

Ok so then post some evidence to back up what you're saying because as of now you're just telling me to take your word for it.

Wait, so which is it? Old news. Or my opinion? It can't be both!

Wow do you even know what I was responding to? You said that corporations and governments use welfare to get people to work, I was asking what you mean by this because the only time I've heard of this was when they pay their workers less because they're covered on welfare.

No, I said that welfare is being attacked by the government, even though it's used by rich people and top businesses. That's called hypocrisy. You don't just ignore the entire point.

Again you're not addressing what was being discussed.

You keep overlooking it...

Bold words from someone who hasn't responded to any point or provided any evidence and calls people idiots for not agreeing with him.

Bold words from someone that wonders how all of this has happened and wonders why they are called an idiot when they ask questions that are self-explanatory, but you know "global low-class tyranny hypocrisy is old news". Right? RIGHT?

I didn't, I know about the IRS Scandal (although it was never linked to Obama) in fact that's what puzzled me about you bringing it up because it's mostly irrelevant to what you're talking about.

The fact that you're so comfortable about something you learned from the media tells me you're full of it and are gullible.

I'm guessing you weren't going to "type the rest" because you had nothing to begin with.

No, I got tired of you ignoring the points and asking questions that answered the points. It's circular logic.

Well posters like you come around every other month. They make some long post about the government being corrupt and us living in some dictatorship and then attack anyone who dares disagree with them or question them. These types of posters act very emotional and don't care about sources or evidence, often disregarding anything you're arguing and then go off some tangent about how we're some media drones who just repeat what we're told etc. without actually a. proving it or b. addressing our points. Arguing with these types of posters is like arguing with a homeless dude on the street preaching the end of the world, they're just opposed to changing their mind or any other viewpoint. It's the definition of ignorance.

Before you reply let me just ask you, do you think the way you're arguing is going to convince anyone? Or at the very least make them think? Do you think that some onlooker will look at your post and think "wow he's right!"? Do you think I could go to some academic debate, state my position then insult anyone who disagree's with me or asks me for evidence and then win? Do you think if I argued with you the way you're arguing with me that you'd be convinced? Or is your goal just to insult and not to enlighten? Do you not care if anyone agree's with you and probably know that no one will?

If you're wondering what happened to the others like you, they got banned or just don't post anymore, the main reason being according to them "they're banning me for my opinions and for me asking questions" when the real reason is that they're just insulting everyone who disagree's with them and ignoring people's questions.

You don't even sound very in tune with the way the world lies, deceives and seem very comfortable with the media - don't complain to me that you're gullible and ignorant, yet think you have what it takes to bring points to the table I had provided.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 08:27 PM, Warforger wrote: Has nothing to do with this rich v. poor dynamic.

It has to do with the hypocrisy. Keep up with the context, please. It's not that difficult. If I can understand poor english speakers, trolls purposely butchering their syntax or women that say everything and not mean what they think, then you sure as fuck can understand this, unless you can't - it's that simple, War.

Again source?

Fuck your sources. The entire "source train" is the reason why bias is alive and well today. It's a bipartisan cue, that's used when they have no points themselves, so they beg it from the person they won't understand to begin with instead. Evidence is not evidence to a dishonest person. You either argue the points, or forfeit. I have debated, discussed and argued belligerently for over 8 years; I know the tricks of the trade, and I know how to deal with excuses (read my signature).

What do you mean? The only way I've seen it used is an excuse to pay people less.

Group A says welfare is consisted of only the scum of this planet that do nothing valuable to society. Group B contradicts that, and happens to consist of the same type of people that cry as Group A.

What delusions? If you could read you would've known I said that there are people who need it and people who don't and both are on welfare.

Stop acting like an idiot and proving how oblivious you are to this. There are three types of people in this world:

Those that make things happen.

Those that watch things happen.

Those that wonder what happened. (you)

1) I have never heard of this before
2) I'm an idiot if I don't automatically take what you say as fact without even a personal story to go along with it? Wow.

Ignorance, ignorance everywhere. I would be nice and say, "well you're okay since you just don't know", but you're also stupid because you completely ignored the IRS scandal with Obama; you completely ignore that the people that run this country expect US to work, while they do nothing; expect us to work hard, while they just raise the ceiling... I'm not even going to type the rest. You'r a waste of time.

and the foreign people abuse food stamps BECAUSE the government allows foreign people to come in so they have to pay less for labor... While their own people have to compete with non-english speaking foreign people with improper education because this country doesn't even prioritize proper education! Schools just cheat their success by sending out a lot of lies and deceiving tricks to get them on the "top list". Like, I don't know, "pay to fame" tactics.
Um when an immigrant comes into the country, they contribute to the economy if they're taking up a job. If what you were saying was true there would be less jobs if people had more children so people should have fewer children so that they get their jobs. An immigrant is blamed out of intolerance, when the population increases the economy grows, when that happens more jobs open up. It's basic economics. That's if they get a job, but you're clearly not talking about the immigrants who don't.

The economy is not growing - it's eroding. Are you THAT DENSE?
Um no it is growing, just at a slow rate.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=US%20GDP%20growth

Please tell me how you are still trying to reason that CEO's, white house, congress and sports players get paid more, while people that risk their lives don't - when the government, if they cared, could have passed laws to prevent this disgusting double standard at any time! They haven't, because THEY do NOT care about us - they care about their money - PERIOD.
No not really. In fact I literally already explained it to you; soldiers are much more plentiful than sports stars and politicians and require less prior expertise. Anyone can be a soldier for the most part so therefore their salaries are lower than that of sports stars and politicians, which there are relatively fewer of.

While you think that "poverty is only made up of idiots who are lazy and irresponsible", is the only case while we're at it. You're delusional - please adjust your lens for the sake of humanity and the justice it has deserved long enough!
Again you're putting words in my mouth, that quote is nowhere to be found in my post. Please learn to read.

Anyone, like you, that thinks poverty is the people's fault only - not the government doing nothing, spending our taxpayer money on golden toilets, raising the ceiling, stealing more money from China, then thinking they can get away by fabricating a coin to pay off all of the debt, since well, guess what... money right now is PRINTED - there IS NO REAL VALUE anymore. It's all lies and tricks so they can continue to play monopoly with our lives and our LAND.
Ah yes I am that powerful to keep poor people poor! And now you want to talk about paper money?

"I haven't seen that happen" is a stupid argument - period. It's called context - cross-references - following consequences and correlations. LEARN HOW TO ANALYZE, and stop falling for the ANAL LIES.
No please provide some source for this. Pro-tip: People are not idiots simply because they don't assume everything you say is true.

The rest is you being an oblivious buffoon that disregards plenty of red flags to make you say "Hey! this government does seem pretty shady. Let's start connecting the dots, instead of asking more stupid questions that completely ignore the red flags that are right under my nose!".

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 07:10 PM, Shade wrote: ITT: Insanctuary continues to believe people take him seriously.

Yet here you are responding to my thread, that nobody takes seriously, because let me guess "You don't care, but for some reason can't help yourself from stealing my spotlight that you believe ol' so much is crap and worthless, but feel so obligated to steal it anyways as if it was truly threatening you in reality and in the end you envy me carnivorously."

Response to: This theory gives me migraines... Posted June 17th, 2014 in Writing

At 6/17/14 01:36 PM, TheGypsyBard wrote: It sounds very familiar. When reading this, I think of a certain theoretical essay written by Albert Einstein on his views of the afterlife.

Are you familiar with Tesla?

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/17/14 10:07 AM, Warforger wrote: Really? Because there are people out there with 3 kids that get so much money in welfare that they and their boyfriends don't have to work. Some cab drivers live in public housing and receive welfare on top of that, since their income is non taxable and because they just stash away their money they're able to purchase 800,000$ homes with cash upfront and then just rent it out, which is more non-taxable income. The issue with welfare though is abuse, not everyone on it is like the aforementioned people but not everyone on it should be on it.

That's why Obama is known for an IRS scandal - that's why the RICH are on food stamps. That's why big business dogs used welfare to support their big businesses, right? Please clear up your "poverty is the only case" delusions, and realize just how fucked up this system is and what lengths the rich will go to, to conceal the fact that they use the same systems they continue to "attack", with "politics" and "cuts".

Source? All I've heard is the exact opposite of people complaining that people on food stamps get to buy ALOT of food.

You're an idiot if you don't know the rich abuse food stamps, and the foreign people abuse food stamps BECAUSE the government allows foreign people to come in so they have to pay less for labor... While their own people have to compete with non-english speaking foreign people with improper education because this country doesn't even prioritize proper education! Schools just cheat their success by sending out a lot of lies and deceiving tricks to get them on the "top list". Like, I don't know, "pay to fame" tactics.

The cost of living is always going up if the economy is growing. As for Sports players and CEO's, those don't have much to do with the government but they are payed much more in America than other sports players and CEO's in other countries. The argument can go both ways, are American CEO's better than say Japanese or German CEO's that they deserve more money? I'd say hell no. On the other hand this does attract alot of outside skill, and the top educated Indians from IIT schools immigrate to the US and become CEO's of various corporations. Either way both sports players and CEO's are going to get paid much more because they have a low supply whereas there's a large supply of soldiers.

The economy is not growing - it's eroding. Are you THAT DENSE? Please tell me how you are still trying to reason that CEO's, white house, congress and sports players get paid more, while people that risk their lives don't - when the government, if they cared, could have passed laws to prevent this disgusting double standard at any time! They haven't, because THEY do NOT care about us - they care about their money - PERIOD. While you think that "poverty is only made up of idiots who are lazy and irresponsible", is the only case while we're at it. You're delusional - please adjust your lens for the sake of humanity and the justice it has deserved long enough!

Who?

Anyone, like you, that thinks poverty is the people's fault only - not the government doing nothing, spending our taxpayer money on golden toilets, raising the ceiling, stealing more money from China, then thinking they can get away by fabricating a coin to pay off all of the debt, since well, guess what... money right now is PRINTED - there IS NO REAL VALUE anymore. It's all lies and tricks so they can continue to play monopoly with our lives and our LAND.

I haven't seen that happen and I've had to deal with mortage payments and the like. Either way, work is exported because it is more efficient to do it overseas and something called the standard of living improves. If you produce something in the US it'll be more expensive and around the same quality as stuff from China but more expensive. So the average non-factory worker will see an increase in their purchasing power because prices have gone down.

"I haven't seen that happen" is a stupid argument - period. It's called context - cross-references - following consequences and correlations. LEARN HOW TO ANALYZE, and stop falling for the ANAL LIES.

At 6/17/14 07:22 AM, yurgenburgen wrote: CRAAAAAAAAAAAWLIIING IIIIINNN MY SKIIIINNNN

I don't care what you think, but Linkin Park isn't really that bad of a band. Everyone that hates on it, and not what's on the radio right now, is because those that try to be edgy - aren't so edgy when it comes to actual edgy productions.

At 6/17/14 05:17 AM, Shade wrote: Please, go ahead and explain how an Anarchist society will be so much better for the USA.

If you haven't noticed! The government right now is consisted of monopoly anarchists playing with our lives in a ring of flames.

They cheated our freedom. They still want us to work for them. They take our work and send it over seas. They expect us to make real money, while they steal from China and raise the ceiling.

Response to: This theory gives me migraines... Posted June 17th, 2014 in Writing

At 6/17/14 03:30 AM, TheGypsyBard wrote: Interesting concept, friend. Is that a "spiraling" paradox of repeated information I detect?

Self-similarity, yes.

Are you familiar with this concept? The theory, itself is more profound than it, but the paradox is a part of it, yes.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 17th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/16/14 11:54 PM, orangebomb wrote: Please go play on the freeway.

I am not even going to respond to an idiot that thinks "old problems; old news - who cares", is a legitimate argument, while resorting to accusations and ad hominems.

Please contribute - don't condescend. Nothing you say will ever change the fact that the government is a problem, and if you don't want to be sensible about it, then I guess you're the disgrace to every last life that defended this country just so you can take it for granded by playing keyboard warrior all day.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 16th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/16/14 09:11 PM, Korriken wrote: Oh I know how the government works, all too well.

Then why are you making this about me, despite the clear indications that the government is childish and naive, which has no idea what they are doing with their money, while playing mind games with people's lives?

Funny. how about you open your eyes and realize 1 simple truth. You can either sit around and scream, "It's not fair! It's not fair!" you can attempt to change the rules (run for office), or you can make the rules work for you. Those who think outside of the box are the ones who succeed in life. Those who remain in the mild discomfort of the box and scream about the musty smell are the ones who never succeed.

That's really stupid thinking. There were only very few people that changed this world greatly; and they were lucky while doing it. These heroes won a societal lottery by doing so - most great minds die on the street like dogs. You're so narrow-minded, you can't even comprehend this. You just see a few succeed, and then think everyone can do the same exact thing. How delusional!

The insensible thing is you apparently believe that you shouldn't have to work. Hate to break it to you, but if no one worked, the system would simply collapse. Why do you get to be an exception?

As if that was my point. Keep projecting your bias towards people that do/don't work, instead of ignoring the childish delinquency of this government, which MIND YOU, does not DO THEIR JOB. Quit being a hypocrite.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 16th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/16/14 07:53 PM, Korriken wrote: I had no idea the government paid the salaries of athletes. and CEOs. Here's a quick economics lesson for you, Slappy. Do you know WHY athletes make so much money? It's because to the leagues they play for, they're worth the money. Even after all their crazy high salaries, the owners all makes a fortune.

You're a fool if you do not think that the government doesn't have their hands in other businesses' cookie jars, after brown-nosing every single third world country, regardless of how small it is.

Interesting choice of words coming from someone who is raging about having to work 20 hours a week.

You really have no idea how the government works, nor the simple fact they expect their own people to work, while cheating them by placing our jobs over seas and hiring foreigns for cheaper labor. Don't be dense, and open your eyes. Quit making this about me; you're just disrespectful and insensible that way.

Response to: For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 16th, 2014 in Politics

At 6/16/14 07:38 PM, Korriken wrote: So, in other words, you've been riding the system and now you need a job to continue riding the system, and that pisses you off.

What part of you does NOT understand that the government expects their people to get jobs, when they A. Pay sports players / the white house / the congress / the CEO's more than the people that work in actual factories, with the fumes consuming their life span and those who fight for our country with their lives, B. Send our jobs over seas, and out sourcing them for cheaper labor, C. Raising their own ceiling, as if they have unlimited spending while being in debt because they get money from China, D. They do absolutely nothing compared to the people that have to swim through this societal excuse of a lifestyle because the monkeys at top don't know how to control themselves, let alone understand anything that happens outside of their facetious, arrogant, hypocritical, naive point of views built entirely on power trips, hatred and more power trips?

For The Feeble; By The Feeble Posted June 16th, 2014 in Politics

This entire country is a joke. Government enforces labor on people by finding loopholes in welfare programs (don't be fooled; the welfare program were used by even business top dogs, like Amway), under the impression that everyone on this program are "free loaders".

Then they attack food stamps, which is our tax payer money, that we worked for, in some form or another, being secured by a strict system that encourages the money to be kept, rather than given by making it nearly impossible to acquire the money because they purposely want it so you can't get much out of it, while rich people are using food stamps, and no problems there!

Then you realize more things! The cost of living is going up, while the people that work in those factories and the people that defend this country don't get NEARLY paid as much sports players, or CEO's or the do-nothing white house.

They always blame us, and create sweeping generalizations about the people in their financial states, without any common sense or reason, except "lel, this isn't my fault, they are out to get me money".

Then you realize even more shit! The jobs are the way they are; this economy is the way it is because the fucking monkeys keep sending our jobs over seas... And recruiting foreign people because they work for less! So that's why we have a bunch of non-english speakers on the phone while dealing with important services that have to deal with very important finances or other sorts like the mortgage for our house, or the payments on our car...

Fuck this country.

Fuck the government.

Take our tax payer money. Pretend it is theirs. Act like we have to work even more for our money. Gets paid more than they can spend in their, and their children's life time. Still hoards money.

Fuck the sociopaths. I will not settle for this. I hope the people of Oklahoma murder the bitch that passed the bill that people have to work for 20 hours a week for food stamps to stay in effect, in spite of today's economy and the way jobs choose favorites and people that are dumb and robotic, which is why the guy that sits on his ass all day, talks in slurs and doesn't think at all gets jobs over the guy who thinks critically, has more potential than they ever wish they had, can achieve golden scores and is much smarter and innovative than their piece of shit business (of course you don't say that, nor do you act like that). They want stupid people because it's a stupid business build by stupid people who play on weakness, not strengths.

I am disgusted right now. There's no logic in this - this is all greed, more greed. Greed. GREED. G R E E D. No sense. No regard. FOR HUMAN RELATIONS. It's all about the pocket.

Lies in their head, lies in their pocket, lies under their bed, lies in their closet.

Can't spell flies without lies - I'm not surprised!

This theory gives me migraines... Posted June 15th, 2014 in Writing

This theory is so profound. I will have to break this down in pieces in order to assure you will be able to understand this as a whole.

Puzzle Piece 1:

The Universe appears complex at first when we first acknowledge it. Everything appears different in shape, function and ability. It feels like we could never figure it out at this rate. It feels like we, the Earth, and everything on this planet is nothing compared to what goes on in the Universe...

Puzzle Piece 2:

The Universe, Earth, and its inhabitants are not that different, when you understand how to break everything down. Everything we say, create, and do, reveals how we aren't that far from the Universe. That is why we can not question ourselves nor define ourselves, without questioning/defining the Universe.

Puzzle Piece 3:

The next piece is profound. The human body and the planet body contain the same electromagnetic waves of energy that are akin to the northern lights. The "aura", as we call it. Nikola Tesla also mentioned that the planet and our entire biological system exist on the same frequencies.

Puzzle Piece 4:

The planet body and the human body both require the same elements, on different scales, in different forms, by the same subatomic faculties, to be created. The relationship between water, fire and electricity is very important to consider for the next pieces.

Puzzle Piece 5:

Emotions behave like water; they come and go like tides. It is why everyone experiences a deeper sense of thought during the night. There is a relationship between water and the moon. That is also why our subconscious is dark, like the depths of an ocean. Interestingly enough, both the subconscious and the depths of an ocean contain creatures of horror.

Puzzle Piece 6:

The build up of emotion behaves like a volcano. Passion and anger are perceived to blind us with smoke and fire. You can feel the flames metaphysically through experience via the eyes when you are holding back anguish and tears. Fire and water both behave in a liquid form, air form and solid form. There are chemicals that interchangeably behave in water and lava. There are land volcanoes, and underwater volcanoes. Our body contains body heat and 70% water. There is a wonderful relationship here.

Puzzle Piece 7:

Bees behave like electrons. The static heard and seen via a television set or radio behave like irritated electrons. Everything we react to, is via electromagnetic waves produced by the heart. The heart is scientifically proven to be the bigger brain than the brain itself. Its system is electromagnetic. The brain follows the heart's motion, not the other way around. When we are angered, our electrons behave as they do above; it then triggers the emotion of anger.

Puzzle Piece 8:

The finger prints are likened to the Fibonacci Sequence. The eye contains patterns likened to a nebula. The neurons in our brain are likened to the galaxy clusters in space. The roads, street lights, cars, and flow, are likened to the activities inside of our bodies. The brain and the penis are a juxtaposition of each other. If a person were to get on all fours, while nude, you can see the body of a turtle. The human heart has four chamber stages to develop: the first stage looks like a fish heart; the second stage looks like a frog heart; the third stage looks like a turtle heart; the last stage is the human heart. When on all fours, you can see that the brain and the penis are clearly on the opposite sides of the body, while people do commonly refer to them as "heads".

Puzzle Piece 9:

The genitalia contains erectile tissues. The face also contains erectile tissues. The eyes experience a type of climax, when emotion is built up causing the tear glands to swell. The genitalia builds up, swells and creates the same climax. The mouth is easily comparable to the female's genitalia. When we are sick, we dispense either through our mouth, or our genitalia.

Puzzle Piece 10:

The lungs are likened to the roots of a plant. The bones turn yellow; the teeth turn yellow; the nails turn yellow and the eyes turn yellow. There's a figure of speech that goes, "White as a pearl", for the eyes. The jelly in our eyes, and the bone material which make up the rest of the above are found in the ocean, and via the oyster, which contains what looks like the only ocean animal to have something likened to a tongue. Coral is tough, and contains aspects akin to how things are structured inside of us.

Puzzle Piece 11:

Water is the epitome of life. Amoebas only live in water. Amoebas create chemicals that allow us to dream those surreal worlds which reflect our collective consciousness. The chemicals our brain and spine are bathed in when we are falling asleep, are made out of 99% water. Water is not only something we consume and eject; it is the contained Universe.

Puzzle Piece 12:

There is the tornado; the whirl pool; the black hole and the sink hole.

That is air; water; space and land.

Puzzle Piece 13:

Insanity and sanity can be explained with spirals. A black hole is created as a result of creation/destruction. When life does not fail, it does not break itself down to rebuild itself. The black hole is the result of the Universe falling back on itself, to recreate itself for better successions. The black hole can be described in human experience as attempting to write a book, crumpling up a piece of paper in frustration and throwing it into the fire, then starting over, instead of erasing it and reapplying yourself. Therefore those who do not change, can not fail, thus they never change or experience themselves spiraling out. While those that do, not only change, they continue to spiral out into an endless array of self-similarities.

Puzzle Piece 14:

The origin/fate of the spiral further explains how human behavior can be described by observing black holes in space. A black hole is created depending on how much mass the star accumulated. The person's cosmic backlash will depend on how much energy they accumulated in their lives (e.g knowledge, self-awareness, action, experience). That is the very reason why we have people that end up on a killing spree with volatile weapons; they are experiencing their own cosmic backlash which became greater than themselves, as per the supernova of a star is greater than the star.

Puzzle Piece 15:

Our very own experience; the one you can feel right now, is verily captured by the photoreceptors within our eyes, which were formed billions of years ago prior to the birth of stars. We are not alive - we are naive. We are not being; we are the result of being - we are benign. The brain knows everything - our experience knows nothing, but has the privilege to be a part of everything as long as we yearn and ought ourselves. We can't answer questions unless we use this already existing Universe as a tool of cross-reference, therefore we do not exist. This Universe is what makes us known - we only exist because it exists through us.

We are the Universe, role-playing itself.

As above, so below; from form, to faculty; to and fro - Insanctuary

This theory gives me migraines...

Response to: For an example of the unexpected. Posted June 1st, 2014 in General

At 6/1/14 05:29 PM, Me-Patch wrote: Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference - Mark Twain

Fools are predictable. Your responses demonstrate that I am the exact opposite.

Even after I explained my unpredictability; I am still unpredictable.