91 Forum Posts by "Hashshashin"
At 6/23/07 09:34 AM, The-evil-bucket wrote: The Gaza Strip can then hold it's own elections to decide whether or not it wants to become an independent state.
Yeah, but the Gaza Strip is tiny, if I was a Palestinian I wouldn't be happy to huddle into such a small area.
At 6/24/07 05:12 PM, JesusBukkake wrote:
:i don't think we're going to be getting a good libertarian government that aims towards a functioning anarchy any time soon anyway.
And lets hope we never do!
At 6/23/07 06:53 AM, simple-but-sandy wrote: The Jews deserve all that land after all the shit they have been put through.
Though you would at least have thought the British government could have founded Isreal in a place away from all the crazy extremist Arab states.
Yeah, but Israel was the promised land, the jews felt they had a divine right to occupy Israel.
At 6/20/07 09:12 PM, CrazyCory564 wrote: Most people think of communism as more or less a dictator taking everything, keeping a lot of it, and distributing small amounts to people. But pure communism is not like that. The entire idea which communism was originally for was there would be no leader. Everyone would learn to become equals to everyone else. In today's society it could never work because there are always power-hungry bastards who would take control or it would become a total anarchy, and probably never will happen. But what does everyone think about the pure communism idea?
It's a good idea, and the world would ultimately be a better place, but man is too selfish and power-hungry for anything even remotely similar to happen. The whole ideology behind communism is wonderful, but there will always be a ruling class and the proletariat.
Ahh I see. Things have pretty much changed since I last remember them.
I have no questions to ask.
I don't know if you were being sarcastic about anything you said, but you stated that you hated Hamas, and then you said that you were a PLO supporter and both Hamas and the PLO (if i remember) is to opt for the complete destruction of Israel. I don't know things may have changed.
At 6/16/07 05:43 AM, MickTheChampion wrote: I fucking hate Hamas, they've virtually taken over Gaza now aswell - it'll be re-named Hamasstan.
This is now all the justification that the United States and Israel need to bomb the Palestinian people into the dust, the future is looking very grim.
MickTheChampion, PLO supporter.
I feel there is some inconsistency here.
Yeah, but nothing seems to shut Hamas up, they always seem to disagree on something.
Yeah that's right, Hamas forces have pretty much overrun most of Gaza and claimed to have 'liberated' the city from Fatah forces.
Now that Mahmoud Abbas has decided to dissolve the coalition-led government, what will this mean?
At 6/13/07 02:36 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: my cousins friend (who s coloured (screw spelling coloured colored)) got called racist by these white kids after he said that tony blair was stupid. he also says that the country's health system is collapsing and gets called a prick. then they all say that he knows nothing about politics. the kid who is from india now gets bullied and people (apparently) are being racist to him.
i think his opinions are right but they start being racist.
isnt that stupid? they call him racist for saying tony blair is racist, they then tell im to get back to his own bloody country and are racist towards him. who is right?
As said before, no one is really right, it's all down to opinions.
Your cousins friend is absolutely entitled to his own opinion on Politics, and can call Blair stupid and state that the health system is collapsing; because it is! It's a true fact.
The uneducated bullies are infinitely in the wrong, and deserve to be slapped.
At 5/29/07 12:50 PM, LegendaryLukus wrote:At 5/29/07 10:33 AM, Hashshashin wrote: But I really don't think we should blame him, afterall he was doing what he thought was right, unlike other PM's who have made policies for the wrong and misguided reasons.With all respect, I disagree. I think you really can blame someone even they were just doing what they thought was right. You can't just irk responsability for a mistake by just saying "I did what I thought was right".
Yeah I know, but how great would it be to assasinate Alex Salmond just because "you thought it was right" ahh.
But still, I did think the Iraq War was totally justified, but again that is just my opinion.
At 5/29/07 05:57 AM, LegendaryLukus wrote: A lot of people have said that if it weren't for the Iraq War, Blair may have been heralded as one of the greatest Prime Minister's of all time.
Unfortunately, though, you can't ignore that rather important factor. The Iraq War did happen, believe it or not.
The war in Iraq may have been very necessary, a result of not dealing with the issue on the many occasions that not just Britain and America, but the entire international community, had to deal with Saddam Hussein. However, the fact of the matter is that we were decieved by Blair's government in order to facilitate this war.
Oh, plus their thinking of not emptying my bins every week. You can wage a long and bloody war in the middle east at the cost of countless lives on all sides, but if you don't deal with my rubbish every monday, you're out!
I think he still is one of the greatest British Prime Ministers, I mean at the time everyone was all for Iraq, even the Conservatives did not oppose it. I mean there has been some very limited successes, such as the downfall of Sadam and the establishment of a democracy, but compared to his other foreign policies this was probably the worst. But I really don't think we should blame him, afterall he was doing what he thought was right, unlike other PM's who have made policies for the wrong and misguided reasons.
At 5/26/07 01:07 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:At 5/26/07 11:11 AM, Hashshashin wrote:stfu noob you have no place on the bbs to say that to a other userAt 5/24/07 10:31 PM, troubles1 wrote:Right, you dyslexic cunt
Haha, funny. I'm sure you were a 'noob' at one point.
At 5/24/07 10:31 PM, troubles1 wrote:
LOOK DIPSHIT It is not murder, MURDER is taking THE LIFE OF A a innocent, unarmed, person, And you must have the forethought to kill that person. even in our court system it is in different levels, like Manslaughter, MURDER 1,AND 2.
;
I will say this to you once since you seem to be lacking something important in the thing we call a head. as a Soldier I am NOT going to kill someone intentionally unless they bring it upon themselves. so in case you still do not understand Don't point a gun at me and do what I ask And I wont put a Metal Jacket in your Head.
Right, you dyslexic cunt, all i'm saying is that murder is killing someone, and if you remove all the issues about them being armed, dangerous or not innocent, it is still murder at the end of the day. Also, i'm probably going to be wrong here but murder is also the act of killing some unlawfully, and if i'm correct, the Iraq War is, as I still remember it, illegal. So basically, you are killing Iraqis illegally, which is murder.
At 5/21/07 08:46 AM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: there not murderers if there doing it for there country and they feel there life is threatened
It doesn't matter if your fighting for your country. It is still murder, you are still intentionally taking someones life.
And I guess that Iraqi's have as much right to murder as Americans do, because they are the people who ultimately feel there life is the most threatened, compared with the Americans.
At 5/20/07 11:20 PM, KillerCRS wrote: I wanna go through a black hole, maybe one day humanity will learn to use them as transportation.
By all means, but you will be stretched like a mother fucker because of 'Spaghettification'.
At 5/17/07 08:07 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: Yeah, old news for me too; the situation has slowly escalated (domino effect style) to full blown infighting, sorta like in Iraq, although it hasn't reached full blown civil war.
Well the way things are going on right now, I wouldn't be surprised if it lead to a civil war.
At 5/18/07 11:37 AM, KingRugger wrote: I'm not sure about Brown. I find myself only tolerating him because he is Scottish - he has made a hash of things as of late, such as house prices.
And there was his plan about the NHS Cuts, where 18000 people would lose thier jobs, whilst denying recently graduated doctors and nurses the chance to secure a job, as a substantial amount of hosptials will also be closing down.
However, the Conservatives have launched many campaigns against it.
At 5/18/07 04:50 AM, Squigley wrote:
Id rather have Brown than Greasy B*gger Cameron.
Dammit how many time have you said he is a greasy bugger in ths thread?!
You actually can't think of any other names to call David Cameron, you don't refer or talk about any of policies he is hoping to implement if he becomes PM, and key issues that need resolved in the UK, such as the NHS and so on. Your just going along on the fact that he is a 'posh tool' and this blinds you to anything else.
So get a grip, and stop sounding like a broken down record.
Fatah FTW!
If Hamas gained full control of everything, it would only get much worse for Israel/Palestine. Just think how much people would die.
At 5/17/07 01:08 PM, lapis wrote:
Politicians are also more willing to compromise than militants, which explains why the two parties forged a unity government but keep failing to broker any sort of effectual truce between their respective militant wings.
Ahh I totally understand now, I totally blinded myself to the military issues, and just focused on the actual politics.
Ahh I see.
So really, it's all down to the military side of stuff thats causing all the rivalry?
Didn't quite answer my question, but okay.
Whilst reading a BBC article, I noticed it said...
"The attacks came as efforts to end five days of fighting between rivals Hamas and Fatah again appeared to fail. At least 40 people have now died."
Sure, their both rivals because they are the two major Palestinian political parties, but then it said...
"Fighting between Mr Abbas's Fatah and the Islamist Hamas threatens a hard-won unity government they formed in March."
I was quite surprised when I read this, I knew they had formed a coalition government and obviously there would have been some tension as Hamas are hell-bent on the destruction of Israel whereas Fatah opt for peace, but I did not know that it had come to this. Fighting with each other, thats not very good for Palestinian politics.
So what i'm really wondering is, how did it escalate to proper fighting?
With no contest for the leadership for the Labour party, Gordon Brown has officially become the next Labour leader and Prime Minister when Tony Blair steps down.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/666406 3.stm
Whats everyone's thoughts?
Just because there seen as being typically in the middle ground doesn't qualify them to be the best party to govern Britain.
At 5/15/07 02:51 PM, MickTheChampion wrote: Are Americans actually too stupid to realise that, Geography aside, most of them ARE Europeans?
Yes, yes they are.
At 5/15/07 12:03 PM, karaoke37 wrote:
Humanity will eventually become extinct, so it really doesn't fucking matter. Fuck the bees, fuck the human race, and fuck you.
Hahaha, your a tit.
