Gah.

At 2/25/02 02:58 AM, RiftMaster wrote: Oh yeah, I know you probably get this alot but, I just wanna say how much I love Pic O' the Moment! It's so much fun to see my "99 Cent Mcmillenwich" pic up on your site...

I'm glad you like the PotM. But actually, I don't get that many compliments about it. It's good to hear I am appreciated!

I never claimed that this version was a whole new game. I realize it's only slightly different with the graphical enhancements. But, it does have 4 new moves and 3 new levels. I didn't make this game because I was trying to release a whole new game. I made it because sikids wanted to buy Rooftop Skater, and I decided to give it a makeover in the process.

I haven't had a chance to hear it yet, but apparently they changed the music to some decent rock music now. And I have no control over what they pick for the music either.

Also, a lot of people are mad about there not being a level editor or the original characters. Understand this: I did this project on a professional level. They wanted certain things left out, and I obliged. I can't change things in the game now, and a lot of the requests are things they specifically told me to leave out.

I'm sorry if you don't like the new RTS, but I didn't make it to be popular, I made it for business purposes. Personally, I really love the new RTS and the new characters!

Damn, in the time that time that I wrote up my post, PG posted his! Sorry for the two posts about RTS!

Also, apparently clockcrew.com is down because they are switching servers. Believe me when I say it will be well worth it to check back when they get it back up.

I just wanted to let everyone know that Rooftop Skater version 1.3.0 is out. (It's not really the second one, it's just a realy awesome update) I made it for Sports Illustrated for Kids. If you don't like the music (the rap song), don't worry, I was told that soon they will change it to another song they had which was much better. I didn't pick the song for it. The graphics were done by PsychoGoldfish. It is really graphically intense now, so if you have a slow computer, I'm sorry that you won't be able to play at full potential.

PLAY IT NOW!

On a side not, go watch Frank2982's new movie, Frank, FrankClock, just uploaded! I drew the doors on the bus!

Everyone check out the release of www.clockcrew.com! The layout looks really nice so far!

Finally, I wanted to tell Tom that everything he's doing is really great. Keep up the good work!

At 2/19/02 01:13 AM, teh wrote: Hahaha, i told you so!

hahaha

At 2/23/02 04:33 PM, Zeffy wrote: Oh yes, the time has come...
Tired of people making crappy topics and making a big deal of blamming suckass flash movies?
Want the bbs to be the way it used to be?
Want me to just shut up and stopping making melon topics as in the past?

Then Blam thhe Blamming club club is for you!

Benefits revealed later!

Someone better start a Blam the Blam the Blamming club club club before this gets out of hand.

At 2/22/02 12:48 PM, RaNcIdPsYcHoJoSe wrote:

At 2/22/02 11:56 AM, TannerCenterwall wrote:

us?

RaNcIdPsYcHoEnTrOpIcOrDeR???

The kids, the popularity contests, the large amount of random wastes of time. The acceleration of difficulty in finding really good work on the portal anymore.

At 2/22/02 11:05 AM, RaNcIdPsYcHoJoSh wrote:

At 2/22/02 03:47 AM, Valz wrote: Yes I plan to.......
GOTO SLEEP!!!

What do you look like anyways?

Nobody knows...

At 2/21/02 11:07 PM, Thorfalcon wrote: Just a brief thought about God...

Some of you denounce Him because you cannot understand Him.

But if you DID understand Him...

Would He be God?

It seems to me that the very nature of God is not understandable, just as you are trying to say. But, this very statement is a small part of the reason I don't believe in God. It's not that I can't understand God that I don't believe in Him. It's the fact that he is not understandable, and therefore supposedly defying logic. This is a logical trap, because anyone who asks, "Is there a God?" cannot logically answer the God without immediately concluding "There is no God."

When you think logically (or at least when I do, in the mathematical mindset), there is nothing outside of logic. So, when you attempt to think logically about anything at all, you immediately discard anything illogical, especially things that are self-proclaimed illogical!

This is not to say that it disproves God, but since we have even taken the first step to ask if he exists or not, then we must take the steps to try to answer this question. What other way are we to approach a question if not logic?!! Shall we resort to making up stuff? Hurling out any random idea that pops into our heads? Whatever sounds good? Whatever we WANT to exist?

I feel most people believe in what they do, not because they honestly feel it's true, but because they WANT it to be true. Otherwise, I can't understand how people can be so devoted to religion without studying all religions and really making an honest attempt to question what they happened to be born in, or what seemed appealing!!!!

This is exactly the main reason I am not atheist, the reason I started questioning God in the first place. Not because I wanted to be different, or because I was looking for some reason to not believe in God, but because I wanted to know God the best I could and be the best representation of a spiritual entity as possible!

But, in my attempts to better understand God, I have actually concluded that there is no God, until future theories and ideas reveal themselves to me, upon which I will evaluate and consider.

Surely such excellence could not have come about by chance.

Surely? What amount of logic suggests this? Our lack of understanding makes no other implication than our lack of understanding.

The wonders of nature are absolutely astounding, the wind, the rain, the hail and the snow were all products of chance, then why is it that mankind, with all his technological know how, cannot even divert the softest of breezes which blows through the trees in summer?

Just because we aren't powerful enough or yet quite smart enough to understand many things, doesn't mean those things are something beyond physics.

So we should ask ourselves, is it still possible for such a complex being such as ourselves, to be a mere product of chance, or rather, are we products of a supreme and skillful creator, who has shown us that he really is The Supreme Creator?

Yes, it is indeed possible, and there are many theories out there suggesting this very case. I have a few of my own as a matter of fact.

Maybe if they believed in a Creator, the basics of life would perchance return to them, just as they have returned to the Muslims.

This may be true, but I don't believe the benefits of believing in God are relevant to God's existance. Once again, I believe those benefits are mainly psychosomatic.

We should remember, that the creation of humanity was neither an accident, nor a development from monkey to man.

*sarcasm* I wasn't aware that I ever forgot. */sarcasm*

Evolution is a proven fact. It may not have been from monkeys, but whatever the path evolution took, it did take place, and does take place.

I noticed you posted this same post twice, in different places. It is common for religions to repeat themselves in order to support their belief and to attempt to brainwash people into believing. Why don't you offer some new or at least somewhat different evidence of God?

I'm sure most of us are aware that God is susposedly all loving and that heaven is great and all that, but most of us aren't convinced by hearing it the first time. I'm sorry if I offend you, but frankly rhetoric, redundancy and false assumptions tend to bother me.

At 2/22/02 02:40 AM, TheUnknown1 wrote: I think you need to make a game now.
Let's see what you can do!
Huh? What was that?




I thought so...

WTG entr0pic:) I am so proud of you!
I...I feel all teary eyed.

Hehe, thanks! Don't worry, I'm making more games.

At 2/22/02 10:11 AM, fourchinnigan wrote: Woah...
that's actually pretty sweet.

When I saw the set up before I thought it was gonna turn out sheeot, just like red ranger's site... But this one looks very nice and pro. Not too cluttered or anything. Way to go guys! Keep it up. Just don't allow wannabe clocks to crap it up.

Whatever happened to the wacky BreadGoodBaconSwissMeltTomatoYummyBiggieBurgerClock?

At 2/21/02 09:26 PM, TheGester wrote: I need someone to give me tips on how to do a good Flash and I will release more for y'all once I get started. One question how to do a preloader...

Yeah ok! Just let me drop everything I'm doing and I'll spend all my energy teaching you what took me more than a year to learn!

And of course I'll show you how to make a preloader, because they're aren't tutorials of them anywhere!

At 2/20/02 03:43 AM, TheUnknown1 wrote: I'm game....
My Army awaits your arrival:)

I'm taking you down!

At 2/20/02 03:36 AM, iLLiCit147 wrote:

At 2/20/02 12:31 AM, EntropicOrder wrote: It's funny when you bump a topic and people respond like they just said it.

hehe..........

Hahahaa.

At 2/20/02 02:34 AM, beergutt wrote:

At 2/20/02 02:28 AM, HAQnSPITT wrote: I'm 44

I have to say Id pay good money to see her light herself on fire.

Bahahah!

At 2/20/02 02:13 AM, Septimus wrote: The Principle of Falsifiability is really all you need to not believe in a supreme being. If you can neither prove nor disprove a hypothesis, then you have no need to consider it true- if it is not true, then it is unnecessary. I miss my philosophy of science classes...

Thank you Septy. I try to be correct in my speech, so I appreciate your help.

You can't even test the hypothesis, let alone prove or disprove it. But, many people think that they are experiencing God everyday, and that it is proof enough for them. But I believe they are experiencing psychosomatic phenomena. What do you think Septy?

At 2/20/02 02:51 AM, beergutt wrote: Boooo hoooo hoooo

Dude, I realize you have your opinion, and possibly even a valid point, but you don't need to rip on people. Go to one of the spam threads if you want to be a jerk, this one's not for you.

Personal attacks never solve anything. Ever.

At 2/20/02 02:47 AM, Shrapnel wrote:

At 2/20/02 12:17 AM, EntropicOrder wrote: I believe if it will help save lives then do what you need to do to the animals. I do believe it's good to find different ways to find out how things will work if possible, and the most humane way possible if animals are necessary.

It is only natural that animals die at the benefit of other animals. Obviously, we are intelligent and should be as humane as possible, but it is natural for us to kill animals when necessary.

I also think that if you don't like using animals for science you should not use any form of Western medicine.

Might I add you'll probably end up dying soon too.

I'm glad we agree on something Shrap.

At 2/20/02 12:25 AM, traekwon_ wrote: hey, insult people in your own forums and leave this sandbox to me

This forum is just as much mine as it is yours.

Most people here are 13 to 15. I'm 20.

It's funny when you bump a topic and people respond like they just said it.

At 2/20/02 12:21 AM, Zealotlee wrote: well mabye some of you noticed i was gone, but now im back! bow down to your leader! (j/k :-D)

You made such an influence with your other 3 posts. I'm soooo glad to have you back!

I believe if it will help save lives then do what you need to do to the animals. I do believe it's good to find different ways to find out how things will work if possible, and the most humane way possible if animals are necessary.

It is only natural that animals die at the benefit of other animals. Obviously, we are intelligent and should be as humane as possible, but it is natural for us to kill animals when necessary.

At 2/19/02 11:46 PM, Shammer wrote:

At 2/19/02 11:42 PM, Pungee wrote: RISK 2010 is fun

Risk rules. New Zealand ownz j00 in that game...

I think I might buy the online version. That could be fun. :) I hope they have an option to save your game though, 'cuz risk games can be really long.

I can play risks for hours on end! Sometimes all night long...

At 2/19/02 11:43 PM, MentallyDeceased wrote:

At 2/19/02 11:41 PM, Tomismy_Clock wrote: BLAH FUCK YOU DOG DICK POOPER FAT ASS FACE DUMB STUPID DUMB BAD GUY ASS HEAD!!!

If you were talking to me, you can go fuck yourself.

What he said.

At 2/19/02 11:37 PM, lucadude wrote: Dude! What are you talking about?

Enuendos buddy. (the misspelling is intentional)