1,469 Forum Posts by "EnragedSephiroth"
At 10/16/06 06:34 PM, Cereal wrote: turd kid? I was still pimping when your were crawling out of your moms fucked up pussy.
Only an immature child would consider that a serious defense. Either that or you are a very ignorant grown-up.
At 10/16/06 06:21 PM, Cereal wrote: you forgot to mention that he asks his mom to help him with his posts agagag egegeghe.
You signed up in 2004 Cereal so stop trying to act like you've been around here that long. If anything you're probably a turd kid behind the screen.
I think it's a little retarded to reject a person's argument based on the sole fact they're young. You MIGHT have a point in saying they can't argue very well but if his argument is true it doesn't matter if he's of another ethnicity, an extraterrestrial, your grandpa, gay, a talking dog, or a pet rock, if his argument is true then it is what it is and the fact he's young has NOTHING to do with it. On the contrary, you should be ashamed a 13yr old is out-arguing you "ThatGuyUHate" maybe because he's sort of like ThatGuyUWishUWere :P
This topic is pointless.... *cough* it's just a way for TheGuyUHate to try and low-blow another user and isn't founded on any real politics *cough*
Hm... I wonder if Mandark or Dexter will get any votes... *gasp* maybe Jimmy Neutron
Er... I meant the link within that link :/ sorry.
At 10/16/06 04:45 PM, stafffighter wrote: I have a simular plan only it includes sedatives, a tattoo gun and their face.
Mine includes a straw, rubber band and paperclip :/
o-r-i-g-i-n-a-l I will now make it my side-mission to post this link http://www.newground../topic.php?id=589424
in response to any reference jwelch makes to his, just to annoy him :)
At 10/16/06 05:55 PM, jlwelch wrote: I already have (see above post) and take notice of your irrational anger towards Christianity. It is a sign of the unsaved, as discussed in the link above.
Again jwelch, your argument is full of more holes than cheddar cheese because all you've managed to do with that link is plug one of the many holes in it. Every time you keep citing one guy as a reference your words become less and less important and eventually people will begin to skip over your posts disregarding anything you say because it is extremely one-sided.
Also jwelch, I can say that according to the Dragon Rouge you are a prime example of someone who is enslaved by unfounded beliefs and principles, thus you are mentally chained and cannot truly free yourself from the constraints society and religion have placed upon you. Would you like me to provide a link to the antithesis I will use every time you provide yours? http://www.dragonrou../english/general.htm
Start arguing like a real person and not like a marionette.
Note: I'm not a member of Dragon Rouge nor do I follow their philosophies. The use of the cult in this post was an example to provide an extreme antithesis to whatever nonsense jwelch is spouting and in no way influences any of my political views.
At 10/16/06 05:46 PM, the-man-who-knew wrote: "George bush has been found dead in his bath with 2 gun shot wounds to the head. Forensics believe to be suicide"
I laffed.
People tend to be more inclined towards bad news because it usually presents a problem which should be taken care of, i.e.: a suspect needs to be apprehended, a policy should be fixed, a certain group should not be under or over-priveledged, people are dying so how do we stop the death and so on...
Bad news presents situations in which we can be heroes or the ones to find a solution whereas good news makes people say "oh that's nice" and... that's all there is to it :)
Aw fuck, I didn't think the Patriot Act would get passed, but this is a reincarnation of the patriot act! Sure it leaves out the spying without a search warrant but it still has the same provision which allows you to get thrown in jail and not be tried.
Basically the saying: "innocent until proven guilty" no longet applies and is a thing of the past if this bill becomes a law.
Joe must not live in the U.S. but instead in a beautiful magical world that pays 8% YTD and does not have an exaggerated cost of living where the lowest rent you can find is $800/mo. What a smart Joe would do (according to Rich Dad, Poor Dad) is either invest his money and get a return on it or take out a loan and begin his own business which he can later develop into a business system independent of his everyday presence. THEN he'd make that million quick.
I agree JoS, don't let homos marry (boo), save the sanctity of marriage, will somebody PLEASE think of the CHILDREN?! and so on...
Oh and here's a lil' somethn' for all you guitar/music lovers, although I'm sure most of you heard by now:
http://news.bbc.co.u..tainment/4508158.stm
Oh and the greatest scientist ever was Ben Franklyn, plus I get double-points because he's also a political figure so STFU! ;o Such maturity I'm displaying.
At 10/15/06 03:52 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: You are in desperate need of an education if you can't see the difference.
Shhh humbucker is being a troll I'm sure. Besides, when people from general post in politics threads... it's best to stay away from those threads, lest it rubs off on you.
Ok, scientists don't know what brought about the big bang, or what lies within atoms and dark matter. Why not say God created things and the laws which government and just then just let them be? Why is it so hard to live and let live? Howcome it's so difficult for people to strike a compromise between evolution and creation without trying to tear each other's ideals apart? It's like two silly little closed-minded kids with a lot of important stuff to say yet they're not listening to each other.
No no, you've all got it wrong! The most-important South American country is Suriname, with a whopping GDP purchasing power of $2.818 BILLION dollars *pinky in mouth* bwa hahahaha! Plus it's the smallest S.A. country so... you know... it can move around real fast... it's swift... <.<'
At 10/15/06 05:13 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: But just to give you some piece of mind, it is a WELL KNOWN fact that most crimes committed with firearms are by people who do not legally own firearms, not wheter or not they have a criminal record. This includes kids with clean records but are under legal age to own firearms.
Your argument is believable on the basis that it seems very possible, especially in the mixed community I live in which happens to be comprised of a lot of immigrants, and also happens to be about 2 hours away from Mexico :/
Personally I think different religions give the world more variety. Funny thing is the 3 main religions (Christianity, Judaism and Islam) are all spawned from the same beginning and arrive at the same conclusion so... it's just funny. As far as Hinduism goes, that religion is extremely interesting and I'd love to learn more of it. Someone true and secure in their religion would not reject others but instead learn about others and see what they may have in common with them. After all, the bible teaches all those good christians to embrace those who are different and not forcibly baptize them :)
Jwelch, it is important to back your arguments with a source which is not the same source for everything else. If you use the same source for everything you distort your own views and make them seem very narrow, closed-minded and exclusive of everything else, which would suggest no one else agrees with you on the matter... which based on what I've seen in this forum, is exactly what is happening. If this forum is a microcosm of world ideologies, then your views are seriously flawed, even amongst the religious.
At 10/15/06 06:06 AM, lapis wrote: Errm, the subject was still the murder of Hashim Ibrahim Awad as far as I know. This wasn't a combat situation, this was frustration and the act of venting that frustration, in the form of ten bullets, at the head of an insurgent's neighbour on April 26, 2006.
According to FOX it was more like 17 bullets, from two different soldiers :@ but who cares about the exact figures. They executed the guy and tried to plant evidence, that's just wrong. It's for that same reason of corruption that so many people hate the police in Los Angeles... But I'll stop there, that's a whole other can of worms.
Oh and on the same vein of making decisions based on logic and rationality: there was no rational or logic reason to shoot that civilian, plain and simple. Unfortunately the witness (Bacos) thought it would be more rational if he went with the flow. It's a good thing for him he did because just maybe he might have been shot in order to provide the other soldiers with evidence they were indeed in a skirmish.
It's a shame though that none of the other soldiers could stand their moral ground >:\ strength in numbers would have forced the commanding officer to check himself twice.
At 10/15/06 05:01 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:
Hm I think your argument was meant for the British Journalist topic not the civilian execution topic...
Remember that this took place in March of 03 during the invasion of Iraq. The Marines were in the middle of a WAR.
The slaying in thos topic in question happened last week. October 6, 2006.
They had already fought, killed, and their buddies had been killed and disfigured before their eyes. They cannot be expected to have perfect "self-control and ethics" all the time.
Soldiers I know who have been to Iraq tell me nothing's happening there lately. There are pockets of resistance in certain areas and every now and then there's an attempted attack but it's not as tense as it was 3 years ago.
It took place in the middle of a fierce firefight between Marines and Iraqis.
For contrast, the slaying here too place during a relatively calm and quiet night while they were out looking for a known insurgent. They knew the civilian they'd found was nothing more than a civilian.
If the marines were in the middle of a firefight where they themselves were in danger, do you think that they would intentionally take their effort away from fighting the Iraqis to shoot an innocent person just for the hell of it? I don't think so.
They did in this case. What's worse is they tried to frame the civilian they shot! Some of these facts come from your beloved right-wing FOX news of all places!
People don't want to emphathize with the Marines, they just want to jump to a conclusion to support further anti-American propaganda.
That may be true of the far-leftists screaming "CONSPIRACY THEORY, WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEE!"
Therefore I think this issue is just another case of the casualties of war, but people are blowing it out of proportion because of their emotional reaction to it.
Personally I think there's something wrong if you're completely numb to innocents dying. It's almost psychopathic. Of course you shouldn't let your emotions run every decision you make in life, on the contrary: you should let logic and rationality handle that, but you shouldn't be insensitive either.
Here's a link to the FOX article on the story: http://www.foxnews.c..nc.politics/pentagon
Bah I forgot to post what I was going to talk about in the first place, got all caught up in the latin actress thing...
Fli have you been to his house? Is it anywhere near you? That place looks freakin' sweet, and it's even sweeter when you hear of all it's secret doorways made to keep "ghosts confused" :D
You know who's hot? Alicia Machado... or Roselyn Sanchez... *dies*
Hm now I'm curious as to whether there are any readily-available statistics showing most crimes committed with firearms are done with firearms which are:
1. Used by criminals with a record
2. Imported from other countries
I agree with what Nikolai concluded. It is a case of being at the wrong place at the wrong time. But what makes it worse is it makes it look like a lot of our soldiers lack self-control and ethics.
At 10/15/06 03:19 AM, Empanado wrote: Hey, do you guys want to know the shocking ending to Ugly Betty?
IN THE END THE UGLY CHICK GETS RICH AND HOT
Good lord aren't those screenwriters just OOZING creativity?! :D
At 10/14/06 03:53 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: Yes, I do see something wrong with that.
Similarly, the Patriot Act also had a similar tone to it, that's the main reason it wasn't passed.
Sure if you trust everyone in the military tribunal is a completely ethical and honest person with all the facts, informaton and unerring truth then there would be no problem with that kind of system but... nobody is perfect, especially those with power.
At 10/14/06 06:07 AM, Athlas wrote: What are the odds of actually being able to grab a gun and shoot someone while being threatened?
Hm maybe if you were quick-draw McGraw or Walker Texas Ranger. But seriously the odds of that would be about the same as a martial arts expert blindly stopping a chair from hitting him without knowing it was coming, it's just unrealistic and highly improbable.
I know what you all are thinking. Please cut him some slack folks, English isn't his first language :/ I'll look into Loose Change sometime when I get the chance, thanks.
