3,094 Forum Posts by "Empanado"
You're forgetting that the eastern regions (the ones trying to secede) are predominantly white, compared to the more indigenous western regions.
I'm not the biggest fan ever of Evo Morales, but these people from Santa Cruz and the surrounding areas are just fucking A.
Sure, they never had a problem with forming part of Bolivia as long as they had a white, aristocratic and oligarchic "president". Some darkie gets elected and he tries to distribute better the wealth of the nation (regardless of how good he's at it) and suddenly it's all "different cultures! we must break away!".
I mean, we're talking about an area where their people tend to identify themselves as "the part of Bolivia where everybody's white, tall, and speaks english". Eastern Bolivia has been historically racist and opressive towards the indigenous population. If Morales, along with 80% of Bolivia's population, were black instead of Amerindian/mestizo, this would be a fucking outrage.
At 12/17/07 05:58 AM, DanJones wrote:Believe me, im not trying to be sexist at all. and if anyone was offended by this post, I sincerely appologize.
One would think that a woman who gets all bitchy and annoying about things would never manage to garner enough political successes to become a presidential cndidate, let alone get elected.
It's like saying "black people probably should stay away from the presidency, since some of them are criminals".
Of course a criminl shouldn't become president, but who's going to elect a criminal into presidency in the first place? Or what party's going to choose a criminal as their running man?
Yeah, I know, all politicians are criminals, son todos naaarcos, etc
Oh I just saw this:
At 12/16/07 04:04 AM, DarkWizard1992 wrote: But yeah, no hay problema... Ché... (Now Empanado is getting even MORE pissed off)
Puta el hueón hueón, hueón.
A quick skimming through wikipedia reveals this line:
"Unlike many world leaders, Mbeki appears to be at ease with the Internet"
I don't know why, but that made me laugh my ass off. I say vote for the Internet guy.
In all seriousness though, and again only by a shallow fast read of their wiki pages, Mbeki seems like a better choice than this Zuma guy. Even though neither of them strikes me as a perfect candidate (Mbeki strikes me as being too lenient on crime and on his foreign policy, specially relating to that Mugabe fellow; Zuma , well, he just gives the impression of being one sneaky bastard), Mbeki has done a decent enough job and, if there's truly nobody else who's a strong candidate, I guess it's better to go for him than some random guy who could make all the progress made in the last few years go to the shitter.
And re-election limits aren't too hard to get past by, he could call a referendum to modify the constitution, like Hugo Chávez tried to do (and since he apparently doesn't garner as much rejection as Chávez does, he could succeed), or he could choose a "puppet candidate" or some other shenanigans, like, I don't know, hving his wife run instead of him.
I don't know much bout American elemections and their canundinates, but I am certain of one thing about this Kucinich fella: I'd fuck his wife.
At 12/15/07 09:03 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:lame stealth jewThis is why you don't integrate well with the rest of Latin America.
no its because of stealth jews
At 12/16/07 01:06 AM, stafffighter wrote: So, who wants in?
Can I be the minion/ henchman/ bad dude whom you know from the first time that he's going to turn good at the climax because he makes a troubled face when the main villain orders him to do something evil? As in:
Villain: Minion! Kill that person!
Empanado: *troubled face* But, sir...
Villain: OBEY!!
Empanado: *kills person*
Villain: Mwahaha, that's great, you're my best minion and you would never betray me.
--CLIMAX--
Empanado: *betrays*
An optional feature is a small but "meaningful" monologue in the middle of the movie where I say something along the lines of "I know that we're doing bad stuff, but in the end we're the good guys... right?". Also, in the middle of a shootout or something, when we're both aiming our guns to each other, one of the good guys will say something cheesy like "you can choose your role... or you can let your role choose you. REMEMBER THAT!!1!!". Then, in the end of the movie after I've shot the villain from behind, the good guys will stare at me befuddledly and I'll say something like "I guess I chose my role now".
After that I can either collapse and die because I had been shot earlier or I can survive and join the good guys in celebration even though it's likely that I've killed about 20 of them or so in the past.
At 12/15/07 08:34 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: I found a redundancy in the redesign.
lame stealth jew
At 12/15/07 06:36 PM, animehater wrote: Speaking of pwning Chavez, how good of a hand to hand fighter is he? Just a thought on whether or not I might be able to beat him in a fight.
Well he's pretty hefty and he had extensive military training, so I'd say don't press your luck.
At 12/15/07 07:33 PM, Christopherr wrote:At 12/15/07 01:43 PM, Draconias wrote: Besides, GW is primarily bullcrap anyways. Don't make any sacrifices for it, they're pointless.The ozone layer might be important to our health though.
Actually, the hole in the ozone layer affects largely the Southern Hemisphere, in particular the southern area of South America and part of Antarctica.
So yeah, thanks a lot for the skin cancer I'll die from, fuckers.
At 12/12/07 11:56 PM, Imperator wrote: I've always thought of it as "Religion Lite" or something of that nature, because it is a lot more philosophical than "religion" per se.....
Isn't it? I've always thought of it as a "Religion Expansion Pack". It's basically compatible with most religions if you skip the nontheistic view, which isn't necesarily a quintessential part of their philosophy anyway. Still, religions tend to get pretty messy when they mix so probably it's better to leave them just the way they are and leave the mixing to a reducted group of ageing hippies.
I've been trained in Wing Chun, Arnis Sikaran, Ishinryu, Shorinryu, and Judo.
Inuyashayugioh what what what?
Uh... I did two weeks of Wu Shu. I think.
At 12/14/07 08:49 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Did she at least have a hawt daughter?
Unfortunately, no. She was pretty hot in college, but all of her daughters are fat. I think.
Although CFK has no experience in the executive branch, she's been in politics since she was in college, and has governed with her husband; I think she's fit for the job.
Well, Bachelet was pretty much unrelated to conventional politics until the mid-90's. She was never elected to Congress or the Senate but she held a couple of Minister gigs during Lagos' administration. When the general public realized that she also happened to be the daughter of one of the martyrs from Allende's government, she got the little boost that she needed to be chosen as a candidate, even though seemingly the original plan was to have her as a stick-up dummy until Lagos could run for another election - which now seems unlikely.
Ah well. To be honest, she did strike me as a good candidate at first, too. And she's still doing it better than any of the shifty-eyed snakes on the other side could do, anyway.
I don't know if this comes as any help to this argument, but if Wikipedia's definition is correct, then I'm pretty sure that my uncle admitted to have been subjected to waterboarding along with a hefty list of more conventional tortures, y'know, back in the day.
While experiences on torture camps aren't exactly dinner talk, I do recall part of his description. Coincidentally enough, he mentioned a highly uncomfortable bed or bunk, not sure if it was an iron bed but it did cause him back problems for a long while. Then again, he mentioned that for couple of years after spending some months in that lovely place he was terified of bathtubs, swimming pools and beaches. I mean, in practice, he didn't describe it as "kind of like drowning" - it was drowning. He didn't mention anything about being terrified of unconfortable beds, though.
All in all he rated the water thing, along with sleep deprivation (actually preventing him from sleeping), as "definitely worse than the beatings. Except when the beatings involved dogs. Fuck, I hated those dogs."
All in all he said that most things were rendered as "pretty tame" if compared to the electrical shocks and the mock execution, but if you ask me for my two cents, anything that counts as "definitely worse" than a beating can and should be considered as torture.
cat
Cats are so gay. They're always grooming and they rarely eat anything manly.
At 12/14/07 07:43 PM, RommelTJ wrote: And chill out Chile. Germany is way uglier.
And Finland! New Zealand's is also nigh-undoable.
I was talking about her administration, though. She's been pretty lousy compared to previous presidents, although I do realize that it's because she was an unexperienced minion to begin with, not because she's a woman. In fact, the other candidate on the primaries for that coallition also happened to sport breasts and a vagina, and even though she was older and saggier she was much more capable.
Well, it worries me that now they might drop their efforts on what they've been doing regarding ethanol combustibles, I mean, why spend a lot of money in order to get a lot of money when you can simply, you know, just get a lot of money right away?
Other than that, yeah, I guess that as far as South American rulers go, a pretty cool dude with an incredibly stupid nickname who happens to have a shitload of oil seems like a better idea than a rather deranged guy with a Perón complex who happens to have a shitload of oil.
They both have a shitload of oil now, though. Lula might be tempted to cut himself a sligthly bigger slice of the petro-dollars cake, but I don't foresee any serious shit going on in Brazil because of this. The problems that Brazil faces today are these:
- Favelas
- Things located within the boundaries of favelas
- The fact that other than things, there's also people located within the boundaries of favelas
Other than that, they've got a relatively functional democracy (minus the gentle sprinkles of tropical coruption) and for the most part they don't try any funny business. Lula will probably take a path slightly similar to Chávez and spend part of the oil money on social programmes, but since he's not insane those things could actually work.
I mean, meh, they'll probably blow it all off on a couple of gold-plated soccer stadiums and a full equipment of bling-bling soccer uniforms.
At 12/14/07 06:48 PM, RommelTJ wrote: The hottest so far is Cristina Fernández de Kirchner from Argentina. I'd hit that.
Meh. Yulia Timoshenko was hotter. I mean, she still is, but she's no longer President.
Our particular experience, so far, has been... meh. Largely uninteresting, to be honest.
what is this i hear about stealth jews
Yes, when Stealth Jews come into the matter I suddenly lose all of my capitalization & punctuation superpowers.
At 12/12/07 07:06 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:At 12/12/07 07:05 PM, stafffighter wrote: To all of you with the common names, try being John.Unless your last name is Smith, my grandfather still beats you.
Juan Pérez?
I'm a Juan, but I'm no Pérez.
Also, Evo's staring at her boobs!
old boobs
At 12/9/07 07:56 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Why isn't Bachelet there? =(
Pah! She's not going to adjust her busy schedule to make room for some random Argentinean.
On a second note, "dudes, I got re-elected! I rock! Oh, yeah, and here's my wife, whatever."
At 12/9/07 11:36 AM, lapis wrote: You have to follow Jesus only if you want to be perfect and obtain "treasure" in Heaven, and that might only be through imitating his actions, not by simply accepting him as being the son and incarnation of God.
But doesn't that means that I'm still going to hell if I don't gouge my eyes out after watching porn? (and married, I guess)
At 12/6/07 01:51 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: And Chile may one day distribute wealth better than Burkina Faso as well! ^_^
LIES AND LIBEL
Cool things from Brazil:
City of God (movie)
Uncool things from Brazil:
City of God (favela)
At 12/6/07 01:12 PM, Kenzu wrote: No matter the name you use is Pinochet, or ''Pinochet boys''. You havent said anything in Spanish anyway!
No, they wouldn't, since by merely reading the article that is linked by the signature they'd know that Pinochet Boys was the name of a punk band which was, in fact, anti-Pinochet.
At 12/6/07 01:12 PM, Kenzu wrote: PS: I am more experienced than you. You cant win a discussion against me!
Experienced at what, exactly? At spouting meaningless garbage like "capitalism wah wah numbered days long live socilism rah viva fidel" and then pretending you've "won" an "argument"?
At 12/3/07 07:45 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: corruption ranking
Hooray for Argentina! Maybe one day they'll be less corupt than Burkina Faso.
*snicker*
At 12/6/07 06:44 AM, Kenzu wrote: Why should I listen to someone who supports Pinochet?
God, you're such a tool. I guess that anyone who makes the obvious assumption that you're a moron is a nazi, right? Do you go around in school yelling at every teacher who gives you a lousy grade that they're opressive agents of capitalist dictatorship? You live in a very sad world.
No, I don't support Pinochet, you fucking moron. If you knew an ounce of Spanish, as you once claimed you did (and you don't, since you're full of shit), you would have realized that.
At 12/6/07 01:47 AM, Elfer wrote: Think about it. "For all intensive purposes" doesn't even make sense. What is an "intensive purpose"? It has no meaning.
I don't know, maybe it's like... it's not a shallow purpose, it's a purpose that is... intense? Something.
lolcanada
At 12/5/07 02:10 PM, Kenzu wrote: THE FOLLOWING WOULD HAPPEN IF COMMUNIST PARTY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION WAS ELECTED:
You're a moron.
At 12/5/07 05:02 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: socialism fails
You're a moron and you should quit the Internet.
At 12/4/07 08:44 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Well, apparently Chavez supporters like to shoot guns at the opposition. And not just recently.
That video is bullshit. It's misleading and it never shows what they're shooting at.
And before you say that them ahooting their guns makes the target irrelevant, I seem to recall that the coup against Chávez in 2002 was partially fueled by footage of Chávez crowds firing their guns at an unseen "opposition rally". Days later, a different camera angle revealed that the rally was nowhere near the Chavista militia, which were defending themselves from snipers.
