Be a Supporter!
Response to: Mexico is screwing us over Posted December 25th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/25/07 12:45 AM, crazy-eye2 wrote: Wrong version try ebay.com but don't just find a single document that suits your argument. The one I saw showed boys how to swim in river currents, avoid certain people, and a bit of forgery(why?).

It's the same book. Yes, it shows them the dangers of rivers, because otherwise they might drown. It shows them how to avoid certain people, because it could get them killed or in jail. And it has a big picture of a Mexican with forged papers, next to this text:

"DON'T USE FALSE DOCUMENTS OR DOCUMENTS THAT DON'T BELONG TO YOU, AND DON'T DECLARE FALSE NATIONALITY

If you try to enter with false documents o documents that belong to another person, keep the following in mind:

The use of false documents or documents belonging to someone else is a federal crime in the United States, for which they can process you legally and you may end up in jail; also if you declare a false name or say you are a citizen of the United States, when you aren't."

The booklet emphasizes in several ocassions that the correct way of immigration is through the obtention of a passport, visa, etcetera.
Do you honestly believe, for whatever reason, that a government encouraging illegal immigration to another country somehow makes more sense than a government merely looking out for the personal safety and well-being of its citizens?

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 25th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/25/07 12:35 AM, Malachy wrote: Peruvians
they work all of the shit jobs.

Same here. Uh, high five?

So... Christmas/Hannukah/ Kwanzaa. What was everybody's worst present? I got... I'm not even sure what this shit is.
My sister gave me one of those... it's like one of those scented pines, like, for your car? But instead of being a pine, and smelling like a pine, it's a pair of sneakers. And it says "ENJOY! THE FRESH SCENT OF NEW SNEAKERS!"

It's really depressing.

Response to: 2007 Poli Awards Discussion Thread Posted December 25th, 2007 in Politics

I'd just like to say that Earfetish shouldn't be awarded anything at all because he listens to Gunther.

Also, Elfer is Canadian. Y'know, just pointing out facts, doing my best to keep the electorate well-informed. Just like Hillary Clinton says "Barack Obama might be a Muslim" I say: Watch out, Elfer is Canadian.

Response to: Mexico is screwing us over Posted December 25th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/24/07 10:42 PM, ripoffhitman wrote: Countries in middle America don't put stuff in english even though most of the worlds tourism is from America, so screw them is what I say.

Actually, most places with a high influx of (foreign) tourists both in Central America and elsewhere have signs in English in the areas where it's sensible to do so: currency exchange centers, hotels, attractions, restaurants, banks, shops, etc.
They don't have all of their signs printed in English because they haven't got tourists wandering all over the place, same reason why, as far as I know, there aren't any spanish forms or signs in Alaska.

Response to: Mexico is screwing us over Posted December 24th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/23/07 11:10 PM, crazy-eye2 wrote:
At 12/20/07 03:01 PM, Empanado wrote: No, it's the same thing as capitalism. Money, as oppossed to currency, has no nationality.
But they are not Citizens of this country and Mexico even distributes comics telling people how to cross the border properly

And that is relevant to what I said, how?
It's their money, they get to spend it how they seem fit. Wether or not they should be judged, prosecuted or penalised for their illegal status is a different question altogether. But there's nothing wrong or illegal about them sending their money over to Mexico.

Response to: Game: Guess this political figure! Posted December 24th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/24/07 04:50 PM, ThePretenders wrote: How about this guy?

The teeth make me believe he's Canadian, but I could be mistaken.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 24th, 2007 in Politics

I still haven't got any Christm--Holiday presents. I also have no money. Is it ok to pretend to be a jew so nobody forces you to buy gifts?

Also, on a whining note, what the hell? My presidential bid in the '07 elections for the State of Court Jester Award seems to have been foiled. Did I receive a censorship vote? Was I punished by the electorate? Why's some lame-o beating me? Is it because of all the jewtalk? Throw me a bone here, people!

Response to: Zuma victory in South Africa Posted December 22nd, 2007 in Politics

The very little that I've read about Jacob Zuma tells me he's a pretty shifty fellow, but yeah, it's moronic to regard everything as a sign of "The White Man's Burden". There's nothing weird about electing some shady guy as candidate/president.

However, in all honesty I don't really know anything about South Africa beyond Apartheid, Nelson Mandela, Kevin Carter and a couple of movies. Care to give us a little insight on the current political situation?

Response to: Game: Guess this political figure! Posted December 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 12/21/07 06:08 PM, Christopherr wrote:
At 12/21/07 05:56 PM, Al6200 wrote: Here's a hard one:
That looks an awful lot like Isoroku Yamamoto...

Ha! You, good sir, have made an erroneous assumption.
That's Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier, known as the "Voodoo Dictator" by some. He may have been a tyrant, but you can't deny that being a voodoo dictator must have been incredibly awesome.

NEXT
This one's rther tricky since all of these guys tended to look the same back in the day. Hint: Not too far away at all from the previous fellow.

Game: Guess this political figure!

Response to: Game: Guess this political figure! Posted December 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 12/21/07 02:44 PM, public-enemy1 wrote:
At 12/21/07 02:36 PM, lapis wrote:
At 12/21/07 02:33 PM, public-enemy1 wrote: Alessandra Mussolini, Mussolini's granddaughter? All I could go with was the "signora" hint.

That's some fascist booty I'd definitely tap.

This is going back about 60+ years, but shouldn't be that hard.

The only guy hardcore enough to drink a bottle-full of gasoline fuel and crown it up with a petrol-soaked rag: Vywkhswhatsisname Molotov.

NEXT

Game: Guess this political figure!

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 12/21/07 10:25 AM, Der-Lowe wrote: Like yourself

You're just jealous because you can't have my Beagle islands.

At 1/8/07 02:44 AM, Empanado wrote: Also, I just got my results from my college admission exam.
Out of a max of 850 points, I got 699 in Language, 675 in Math, and a whooping 803 in History & Social Sciences.
A friend of mine, who's nerdier than me, passed the Engineering School admission exam with 7/10, pass grade: 6 :D
Another friend of mine also passed his three admission exams for the School of Informatics. :D

Actually that score didn't mean squat in the end. Since the test measured completely inane and useless information, it's basically an overhyped memory exam or whatever. It worked just fine in getting me all pumped up and thinking I was hot shit, only to realize once in college that my ass was easily kicked by kids who either scored 60 points lower than me or didn't even give the test at all.
This holds particularly true when the career's some sort of hippie excuse for a real job, as is my case.

But since you've chosen a more facho approach at the laboral world, I guess you'll have no problem.

and stealth jews
i agree

theyre everywhere

Response to: Game: Guess this political figure! Posted December 21st, 2007 in Politics

Reza Pahlavi, Iranian Shah. Back in the old days, you could live in Iran and be subjected to torture and opression for completely different reasons!

(I suggest that from now on we add a one-liner comment about the above-d4epicted figure, just to prove it wasn't some lucky guess at google image search.)

NEXT

Game: Guess this political figure!

Response to: Native Americans Secede From U.s.a. Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

This process must not be stopped as it poses potential for strong amounts of awesome.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/20/07 07:05 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: REPORT CARD TIME!!!!!!!!

You're a nerd.

Meh, I'll probably become a professor, and teach to get hawt ladies, and to be able to say, "ya know, I teach at the 2nd best University in the country", in that way I'll get moar babes.

You're a nerd with nerdish dreams.
Gosh! I can't believe how much of a nerd you are. This place is FULL OF NERDS.

and stealth jews
Response to: Game: Guess this political figure! Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/20/07 07:05 PM, Splintered wrote: Scary white man

Jean Chrétien.

At 12/20/07 07:46 PM, goozebump wrote: Old black dude

You're supposed to guess the previous one first, but that's Olusegun Obasanjo.

NEXT

Game: Guess this political figure!

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/20/07 02:55 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote: Hey everybody, great news, they're putting out high-definition porn on BluRay.

sigh.

I thought that the Internet made porn movies obsolete.

Response to: Mexico is screwing us over Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/20/07 12:54 PM, Deragos wrote:
what business of your is it where anyone spends or earns their money?
I do not like illegals getting their hands on my country's money, and using it for their own benefit, to me, its the same thing as stealing.

No, it's the same thing as capitalism. Money, as oppossed to currency, has no nationality.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 20th, 2007 in Politics

2007 Politics Awards

Screw you guys!

Response to: Best way to kill a person. Posted December 19th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/19/07 01:05 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Would it be possible, in this day and age, to build some kind of rocket propelled guillotine?
Because that sounds effective. Also using lasers.

But wouldn't the lasers beat the point of a guillotine in the first pl-
Oh, I get it. Guillotine + lasers = Awesome.

I approve.

Response to: For what cause would you revolt? Posted December 19th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/19/07 12:05 AM, rufus-shinra-2006 wrote: But in most cases this proved to be the case. Lenin, Khomeini, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, Kim Il Sung, Hitler, they were once people who led a revolution against a government in their days, and see what they became.

But that happened back in the Age of Crazy People. Revolutions in the last few decades have a decent chance of turning out a-okay, as evidenced by what happened in Czechoslovakia, Ukrain, Portugal, et cetera.

Back in the heat of the Cold War, not wanting to strongly stand against an opressive government was being reasonably cautious. Now, it's just being a pussy.

Response to: Political Compass Posted December 18th, 2007 in Politics

These threads are just a penisfest to see who can lie the most in order to get his point the further away from the center. Somehow answering "Strongly disagree" with everything makes me more of a rebel.

Response to: China's economy smaller than though Posted December 18th, 2007 in Politics

So you're Argentinean and you're a teenager who reads The Economist. I wish I could hate you to death.

At 12/18/07 01:25 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: The new way of calculating PPP does not only affect China, but most of the so called emerging markets, like India ( another article, this one by yahoo finance), and what you have all being waiting for, Argentina.
Aparently we are now defeated in GDP per capita in Latin America by the Chileans. I say all lies, we've grown at a 9% rate for 4 years for nothing, its a stealth jew conspiracy

its always the stealth jews

Well we have a higher ratio of fat balding men with suits and Harvard business degrees, and we're overall better human beings, so I'm not surprised.

So chill out, China will take longer to surpass you economically, destroy you culture, and attack you with knives, and cool kung-fu moves.

And lousy shoes! I bought chinese shoes once, and man, those shoes sucked. And by chinese shoes I mean shoes that are actually marketed as being chinese instead of hiding their sweatshop origins.

Response to: Female Presidents Posted December 18th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/18/07 02:23 PM, RommelTJ wrote:
At 12/17/07 11:14 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:
At 12/17/07 10:24 PM, Empanado wrote: Perú has never had a female president.
LOL
The smiley was a great plus.
This reminds me the time in which I was asked how did the Argentinian Spanish differ from the Brazilian Spanish.
I do not understand the joke. It's a joke, right?

Brazilians do not speak Spanish. Both remarks posed a similar level of ignorance about South America, I assume.

Response to: Scientists poised to create Life Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/17/07 10:23 PM, LordJaric wrote:
At 12/17/07 10:17 PM, Palestine wrote: I don't like it when humans try to play God.
If god didn't want us to have the skills to create life, then god would of made it impossible for us to do it.

If God didn't want us to commit rape he wouldn't have given us a dick.

Not that I do not support this, though. As previously said, it paves the way to much awesomeness.

Response to: Female Presidents Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

Perú has never had a female president.

Response to: Female Presidents Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/17/07 08:28 PM, RommelTJ wrote: You guys forget that the Argentina's elections were a joke. Mr. Kirchner is still in power, duh.

I wouldn't say it's Néstor Kirchner ruling through his wife as much as it's that husband and wife form a single biological entity. CFK could tell her husband to go fuck himself if she wanted to, but she won't because they basically share the same brain. It's like that episode from The Simpsons with the alien candidates - no one's "using" the other one because they're both the same.

Argentinean elections were a joke, but for a different reason altogether.
Son todos naarcos...

Response to: Bolivia Is Falling Apart Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/17/07 05:57 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: But he has implemented rather radical changes, he should've imposed lighter changes, or at least, be more political, like Menem with the military.

Of course he should, but the appropiate response is a stiff opposition, hell, even a coup d'etat would be something to expect (after all they pretty much hold the world record: nearly 200 coups in 180 years of independence), but not threatening to break the country apart, specially when the seperatist movement had been almost nonexistant before Morales' rise to power.

I mean, in most scenarios excessively accelerating a set of radical changes is a bad thing, but when a nation qualifies as the poorest in South America one should probably take the hint that a shitload of changes is better than no changes at all. I say change it all and sort out what stays and what reverts back to normal once things have calmed down.

Do you know what's going to happen with the new constitution?

My guess is that Morales will succeed. With his choice of subjecting n early end of his term to a referendum, he gave the signal of "either I get something done or I'm out of here". The electorate realizes that Evo's the only chance they've got to get ANY changes on the system they've currently got, as evidenced by the last, what, 50 years of military and (white, of course) civil rule?

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/17/07 05:58 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:
At 12/17/07 05:52 PM, Empanado wrote: us Chileans say "pico" or "pichula".
Then "me das un pico?" takes a whole different meaning in Chile.
I have been warned.

Reminds me of a Colombian woman we once interviewed. She told us about how "pico" in Colombia refers to a pouty mouth, i.e. before kissing. So when she had just arrived to Chile, she once wrote n e-mail to his new (Chilean) boyfriend and ended it with "Hugs, and a kiss in your pico".

Dude answers with "...yeeeah, that'd be great".

lulz

At 12/17/07 06:04 PM, Elfer wrote: Let's just say that the ladies call me "Hammercock"

So it's made of wood and/or plastic, with a metal head?
Oh noes! Did you have an accident?

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/17/07 05:37 PM, reviewer-general wrote: hammer =/= cock
What the hell is this nonsense?

Well it'd be difficult to assing it a single word, since there are +20 different nations that use Spanish and most of them have different sets of slang. Argentineans say "poronga" or "choto" (I think), Spaniards say "polla", Venezuelans say "yuca", us Chileans say "pico" or "pichula".

Response to: So Not Pc... Posted December 17th, 2007 in Politics

Well I don't really have a reason to meddle in this issue, but I'll just say this: People don't want their phones tpped or their Internet history spied on because they don't want anybody to know about THEIR SECRET PORN AND/OR PHONE SEX. They don't want people to listen to them ordering extra-small condoms over the phone or hiring an exotic escort who looks just like Ronald Reagan. So when someone says "you've got nothing to hide so you've got nothing to fear" is a lie. They've got something to hide alright, as we all do. The fact that it's probably nothing illegal doesn't make it okay for anybody to spy on it.
Furthermore, this definition of "known terrorists" seems pretty fishy. Even if there was an effective way of branding people as terrorists, a well-trained terrorist doesn't go around discussing anything on the phone. They use the phone to order pizzas, to call their girlfriends, to call in sick to work, to say hello to their children when they're away on a business trip, etc.
So in the end you'll have a bunch of records of the pizza guy's furry convention, some girl being a slut, some bald guy with glasses spending a thousand bucks on fat hookers, etc. It doesn't matter if the people listening to it re your stereotypical agents with a stone-cold look and sunglasses.

Terrorism is evil, but phone tapping is worse than evil, it's creepy.