Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 2/1/08 11:27 PM, pianxx wrote: That is so sad. It almost broke my heart. But how can you tell I'm the only Filipino to view this? You can see that Empanado I assume happens to be a Filipino. He did say he will not vote for them. There you go.
If you don't like my posts then simply ignore them. That wouldn't stop me from invading the internet since I do remain within the forum. And this is not the only forum I made posts.

I'm not voting for them, but not because I changed my mind, I ain't voting for them because I'm Chilean, as you can see in my signature and/or profile. Truth is, there were one or two filipinos who visited the forum VERY rarely, but they're gone now. Furthermore, this does constitute spam since you're not stablishing a debate, merely promoting a product (in this case, a candidacy) by repeating the same message over and over. You're probably paid to do so and that's fine, but please do us the favor of advertising it somewhere else. If you want to use the forums to argue, yell or insult people based on political leanings, you're welcome. If you're using it as a billboard, fuck off.

I thought sarcasm was suppossed to be funny?

At 2/1/08 10:24 PM, Christopherr wrote:

At 2/1/08 10:19 PM, Empanado wrote: Yes, I share my Wi-Fi.
And once I find out who in the entire building I'm sharing it with, I'll beat the shit out of them.

That's a great excuse to hurt people...

They're stealing my Wi-Fi, man!

At 2/1/08 08:55 PM, RommelTJ wrote: Would you share your Wi-Fi? Do you do it now? Are you against it? Why?

Yes, I share my Wi-Fi.

And once I find out who in the entire building I'm sharing it with, I'll beat the shit out of them.

At 1/31/08 11:49 PM, TheMason wrote: Damn MDs.

How can you say that? WHAT ABOUT HOUSE? He'd be a great prez.

Also, this 'pianxx' person has posted the same shit 4 times already, so no, I'm not voting Zósimo Paredes or Adrian Sisón, I'm withdrawing my membership to Ang Kapatiran and I'm urging everybody I know to do the same. Fuck you Ang Kapatiran and your forum spamming ways.

At 1/31/08 05:49 PM, Elfer wrote: They should start some sort of new scholarship fund where it's actually possible to obtain it if you're a straight white male.

You're full of shit! It's perfectly feasible for a straight white male to obtain a scholarship, as long as he's differently-abled, speech, sight or hearing-impaired, height-challenged or member of the so-called "little peoples", household-challenged, religiously divergent or if he holds refugee status.

Can't get a scholarship? Just become a member of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church or something.

At 1/29/08 03:09 PM, reviewer-general wrote: TWO days off of school for hazardous road conditions.

Hells yes.

haha ur in skool

Short answer - No.
Long answer - Hell no.

At 1/28/08 01:49 AM, SomeNick wrote: I think the guy has a point, though. Giving these radical people democratic rights in the West is accomplishing nothing but to the eventual collapse of the West.

You mean, just like any other hate group who has abused free speech has brought Western civilization to its downfall by now? I mean, the Black Panthers, Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, and their preaching against "blue-eyed white devils" 30 years ago -- boy, did those guys completely bring America to its knees, as we can clearly see today. The KKK and the Aryan nation exercise their right to call for the slaughtering of ni'ers, kikes and spics, and hell, they've completely taken over the entire country! Huge followings! The everlasting respect and reverence of public opinion! Let's not forget those radical anarcho-communists in Western Bloc nations during the Cold War, advocating for a bloody revolution and the destruction of bourgois culture- So MANY developed nations switched over to the red side.

This isn't the first time that a minority of any kind goes violent -- and it will follow the exact same logic that it has followed before in any developed country with a functional democracy - the general population is at first dumbfounded, then confused, then scared, and then everything dies off because the benefits of the Free World > stupid radicalism and sectarianism. Islamic radicalism in the west is, quite simply, a minority hate group. And these things are quite straight-forward: offer these minorities a simple, non-violent way to assimilate into the main culture, and (dangerous) radicals will be shunned.

If two kids are front to front, and one is allowed to punch, and the other isn't, well, guess what? The kid giving the punches will win.

Except that, in reality, none of these kids are allowed to punch. They are allowed, at most, to say naughty words. Crime is illegal, remember? And it's illegal both for Muslims and for dirty kuffãr. If there are stupid judges who are willing to let murderers or sociopaths on the loose, then that's a completely different issue.

You can't really expect to democratically convince people whose only and one track mind is "Destroy Christianity.", "Kill infidel women.", "Burn churches.", "Occident is the Devil.", "Europe will have its 9/11 too.", "Christian kids are the seeds of evil." Face it, when these guys get repressed in countries such as Poland, they were asking for it.

They'll get repressed for what they need to be repressed - bombing and burning shit up, punching and stabbing people, et cetera. These things are repressed because they are repressable things. But it's pretty obvious that it's only a small fraction of muslims commiting heinous acts, or else Europe would have been obliterated by now. Why are those other muslims not burning cars or people? Either because they are doing okay or because they're not fucking insane. Considering that every immigrant group in history, by simple logic, eventually starts faring better, not worse, logic dictates that muslims will become less violent. If crazy muslim fringe groups weren't allowed to yell about beheading people or whatever (let's differentiate between saying and doing) they'd become even crazier than they are.

You speak shit about he wanting to defend cultural traditions. Don't Muslim nations do the same?

And that was exactly my point. I don't defend the governments of muslim nations- these places showcase an endless parade of crazy warmongering muslims with AK's and nasty signs because they're mostly governed by people on the insane side of mental health. Therefore, the 10% of maniacs in the population is encouraged to be as mind-boggingly fanatical as they can be, and the remaining 90% of normal people is beaten down into fear and submission. How is this any different than any other dictatorship?

This guy in question suggested that the West should have supported Slobodan Milosevic because the man wanted to ethnically cleanse his land from (i.e. commit a barbaric genocide on) muslims, amongst other groups. That, in my book, is called being a fuckin nutjob. A fucking nutjob not unlike those appearing on the media calling for the destruction of Western civilization.

At 1/26/08 09:40 PM, Cisco-Delgado wrote: And to think that Occident went to destroy Slobodan Milsosevic, when he, in fact, was fighting against Islam...

Wow. So what you're saying here is "We must stand against the brutal enemies of freedom and democracy, and that's why we should have allied ourselves with a brutal enemy of freedom and democracy".
Nice.

Furthermore:

At 1/26/08 09:32 PM, Cisco-Delgado wrote: If this is true, if in Poland you can't speak against Christian Church without being repressed, then consider your country lucky. Trust me, no peaceful people ever talk bad about other religions just like that.

So you seem to strongly favor religious tradition, cultural identity and national security in detriment of free speech and personal liberties, support police brutality and advocate for a black and white view on world affairs.

Have you ever thought of becoming a high-ranked radical muslim? Because you seem to be cut out just right for the job.

It has been said before: They don't become important because they're Freemasons, they become Freemasons because they're important.
I mean, hundreds of years ago Freemasonry was an extremely important force in the expansion of Illustration, secularism, democracy and other fancy things, but nowadays it would be best described as a highly exclusive and secretive golf club.

Bob Dylan is coming in March! Should I go? I'd have to sell my liver.

At 1/25/08 09:55 AM, Scarab-Stalk33r wrote: In the meantime, please sign my petition damnit.

I have that game!!!

I can't believe I didn't get shot while doing that.

How is this censorship? It's just a bunch of journalists being dumb.

At 1/25/08 01:01 AM, Musician wrote:

At 1/25/08 12:50 AM, 0peth wrote: Raptors were estimated to have 120 IQs on average.

Really? 120 is considered above average even for humans.

Funny how nonetheless EVERYBODY on the Internets, specially forums, has been diagnosed with a ridiculously high IQ. It's good to see that people with such astounding brain capacity use it mostly discussing the ramifications of the many significant events of Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction.

Also, OP is emo and might become the next Cho Seung Hui or something.

BORING.

I thought this was going to be about Jack Thompson.

Two Words.

Rob Schneider.

Why is this forum so full of fachos?

OP is a troll. OP is a troll OP is a troll!

OP is a troll, OP is a troll OP is a troll OP is a troll? OP is a troll: OP is a troll OP is a troll; OP is a troll.
OP is a troll OP is a troll OP is a troll -- OP is a troll (OP is a troll).

At 1/16/08 11:15 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: I entered this thread thinking that it was about Nintendo Wii, and I was prepared to say something like "lolz General plz".

I chuckled to myself.

wat u mean the nitnendo wi has 2 do wid politiks cuz it has console war competition agenst xbox by micro$$$oft n gaystation 3

--

No, I don't really see a world war in the near future, at least if the current state of things stays without any radical changes. If, for example, a much more radical government took over in China or Russia, or if any movement other than Islamic fundamentalism gained special notoriety in terrorismness, I could foresee a chain of events that would lead to another world war, or at least a pretty nasty war of non-wordly nature.

International affairs as they currently are can be grounds for a lot of craziness, but no serious threats to human existence.

RON PAUL!!!

Or not.

Anyway, didn't you people get your candidates elected on Feb 5th, the other cactuses or whaever being pretty much equivalent to those tiny chunks of shit that one shits before shitting the serious big shit?

Regardless of the political situation, I'm pretty certain that the 80's were the tackiest, lamest decade as far as Western culture goes.
I mean...

They want the ultimate power to make moose burritos.

At 1/13/08 01:40 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote:

At 1/13/08 01:37 PM, Christopherr wrote:
Your signature links to a "Holocaust reenactment" channel on YouTube...

Which brings in another question...

You're right. The question must be made now:

attactivist are you a stealth jew

Other than his possible stealth jewry, let's keep in mind that in his case it's just the name, while in the OP's case we are led to lovely art pieces like this one:

Wow, world history is full of events that were either inches or seconds away from being the most awesome things ever. For example, this guy was just so damn close to commiting the most awesome political assassination in recorded history.

I ask of you now, what other almost-the-most-awesome events do you know of?

Actually you're both right. Or wrong, whatever. There was such a thing as ancient porn, since not every sculpture of a big-tittied chick served a ceremonial purpose. The thing is that, since ceremonial, artistic and religiously-orientated material is more likely to be well-preserved (since it's stored in better locations), when we think of "ancient boobs" we'll usually think of the Venus of Willendorf or Venus de Milo or whatever.
But excavations on more lowly areas of ancient cities show that there were a lot of, let's say, raunchier depictions of nakedness and sexness. It's just that very few of them are left because they were stored on crappy conditions.

But it's also true that most people back in the day didn't have access to the joy of porn. It wasn't nearly as widespread as it is now. Then again, not having any porn doesn't mean that you can't jerk off, I mean, I know I didn't have access to porn during the first 4 years or so I began to spank the monkey.

At 1/12/08 11:45 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote:

At 1/12/08 01:32 AM, Attactivist wrote: I don't think I need patriotic lessons from neo-nazi scum.

How is he a neo-Nazi? Did he attack minorities and vandalize their properties?

Having a link to a white supremacist site on his sig is kind of a hint, then again he might just be an alt or troll.

I don't get it. What sites could the Australians censor anyway? I mean, is there anything in there that could be censored? Hot kangaroo on koala action? Didgeridoo porn? Billabong fetish?

At 1/11/08 06:53 PM, reviewer-general wrote: Click for details, and vóila!

So you are... attacking yourself? That's pretty weird. Why would you do that? You're weird. I don't know if I should hang around weird people like you.

At 1/9/08 12:29 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Bowie

You are as of now less lame than you used to be.

Yes, I've asked you to change the term "change" into something less played-out.
Go.

Kind of like "[candidate] is for Things Being Not Quite As They Are Now Anymore"?