Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/2/10 04:21 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:

At 6/2/10 02:45 AM, Bacchanalian wrote:

At 6/2/10 02:28 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: no because its a lifestyle and lifestyles have limited protection unlike religion and Race

Is heterosexuality a lifestyle?

well under Military law of the US we dont change laws for everything little thing without a good reason.

You sound like no Freemason Ive ever heard. Isn't one of the core requirements for being accepted into their ranks is to be a person of high moral character? You sound like a terrible and angry person.

I dont even think you were in the military, you probably joined the national guard or something and are their propaganda high. Greatest organization in the world my ass. Haha.

At 4/26/10 06:58 PM, RubberTrucky wrote: The only time when gays really bother me is when they're acting disgustingly flaming. You know, cossdressing and harassing other men and stuff.

=( Cross-dressing is a blast! Apparently you have never been to a drag show... you would laugh your ass off!

I would love to get married to my partner. And probably when we are more financially stable we will move to a state/country where we can.

I would call you a moron but you probably wouldnt hear me.

Boobs aren't that great, I think they just get in the way. So no, not all gay guys find boobs "awsome".

At 12/4/09 01:34 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: I know the hot rumor in Jersey is that Corzine will ram through Gay Marriage and Medical Marijuana before his term is over here and it'll all just be legal by the time the next governor comes in. It'll be interesting to see if anything comes of it. It would be perhaps the only time I'd have to admit Corzine did something right.

I hope you are right, but by this point Ive become so jaded that I just expect the worst and when something good happens I can be pleasantly surprised rather that sick and upset.

Gay Marriage Voted Down in New York

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/i dUSTRE5B157K20091202

I think im gonna be sick....

I'm not surprised most people are repulsed by it, considering how they lack the mental capacity to either roleplay or accept ideas different from their own.

At 11/5/09 07:22 PM, naronic wrote: I'm fucking straight

gay and bi fucking bastards
"though shall not lie with a woman as one lies with a man" leviticus

I should get some drunk college brats to kick all of you fags

How about I get YOU drunk and see where the night takes us? *wink* *wink*

Im about one froot loop away from Lada Gaga worship... so yea im pretty gay.

That girl that was "disabled" was like that BEFORE the vaccine. She is just a media whore, and deserves no sympathy.

At 9/28/09 06:21 PM, ohbombuh wrote: If you could offer some sort of evidence or citation to your claims, that would augment your credibility.

How about you take a basic Human Sexual Behavior class like I did? Or read a freaking textbook:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0789034 182/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_2?pf_rd_p=486539 851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201 &pf_rd_i=0721654509&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DE R&pf_rd_r=006BFSMEYZJ44WJ90MYQ

Its the same reason why really mature and responsible 17 year olds cannot drink alcohol. The age is set at 21 as sort of a "catch all" to try to get as many mature people to that age as possible. Im sure there are plenty of 15-20 year olds who can drink alcohol responsibly. But the untill the law is changed thats the way things are.

The same applies to sex. There are plenty of 14-17 year olds who could willingly and responsibly choose to have sex with someone older. But when it comes right down to it, if it's love and not lust involved, whats the harm in waiting?

Pedophilia and homosexuality are not related.

There is no such thing as an inborn attraction to CHILDREN. Sexual preference is largely due to genetics, due to abnormal chemical changes during development.

You are all confusing sexuality with a PHI LEA.

NO ONE is born loving farm animals, vegetables, stuffed animals, panties, etc etc. That is all environmental and not biological. However, the base desire for one gender or another, that is determined inside the womb.

That is why there is a large distinction between the two. One is biological while the other is not. Ill even admit myself I have a few phi leas or "fetishes". But none of them involve children. And to those who do, as long as you can keep it to yourself without harming children, then there is no issue.

Unless you have taken a human sexual behavior class, the majority of you have know clue what you are talking about. Having a gender identity different from your physical sex is a very real phenomenon. The doctors would have been unable to perform this procedure without first physical and mental examination of the young girl. What most of you fail to realize is that this child was a girl the moment she came from the womb.

We are ALL created female. EVERY single one of us was a girl at one point. During our development, a chemical change occurred that transformed our ovaries into male genitalia. Sometimes this change is not complete, and parts of the body do not undergo the transformation. Such as the brain in this case.

The ignorance of some of you is astounding.

No, you must be a moron for letting such a simple and easy program give you trouble.

Haha, thanks for the laugh OP.

I love the Onion. They always know how to put a smile on my face.

At 8/12/09 02:19 AM, Crazyhobo51 wrote: One last thing, the Africans did actually deserve to become slaves due to their lack of scientific, military, and technological advancement,

Any thoughts?

That right there shatters any credibility of your argument. Can it be argued that some people like Jessie Jackson use race to gain power and money, absolutely. But this clearly shows your are nothing more than a racist moron.

At 7/29/09 09:31 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: i've been watching an animal cop show set in Miami, where a police officer gave a citation to a man who owned a pit bull and told him he had 48 hours to remove the dog from the county.

But why ban pit bulls? Why not ban all dogs altogether, since any dog can be conditioned to be agressive towards humans? What makes the pit bull different?

Ive had this argument before as well. I think they should be allowed to be owned by the general public. However, if you own a Pitbull, or any other vicious or exotic animal, and it damages property, injures, or kills someone, you should face the appropriate penalty... ie manslaughter. You can have a dangerous animal, but you better know what you are doing.

At 7/23/09 02:25 PM, Creek wrote:

st newgrounds users) I'll try to understand where you're coming from.

Okay so logically....... If Marijuana will still be widely used, legal or not, and the effects are relatively harmless (especially in comparison to Alcohol), What is the logical thing to do? legalize or not legalize?

The logical thing to do is tax the hell out of it like they do with tobacco and alcohol. With the government not arresting and imprisoning innocent drug users, the amount of money we would save in law enforcement and prison expenses would be staggering. And the tax revenue wouldn't be bad either.

At 7/21/09 06:20 PM, Khawner wrote:

It was a joke.

With the kind of people we have posting in here, your joking logic is the same level they think at. =P

At 7/21/09 08:07 PM, OddlyPoetic wrote: The real Question is, did Jesus like tacos or cake?

Cake of course, what are you? Stupid?

At 7/21/09 06:20 PM, Khawner wrote: It says marraige is for a man, and a woman. Nothing ever said anything about a black man, and a black woman! And therefore, they cannot be married.

/stupid logic

"It says"; What says? The bible? Sorry but no relevance on US law there. The law? Well yea a very recent law called DOMA says so, but the entire point of this this thread is to show that law is unconstitutional. So... either explain yourself or don't post idiotic things.

At 6/30/09 05:39 PM, Tancrisism wrote: Here is the entire argumentfor and against gay marriage.

Thanks for the laughs, made my day brighter!

At 6/25/09 06:21 AM, fli wrote:

p 8.:

BTW--
I will be going to Gay Pride this weekend at San Francisco, Dekagaru. I will be meeting BrianEtrius. If you already have plans to go, then we should certainly get together and have some sushi or a coffee or whatever. Even if its a little while.

I wish I could go! =( Im stuck here in Phoenix, AZ. We had our pride here a few months ago. I just landed a new job as a video game tester at D3 publishing and I must get ready for it. Perhaps when im better off financially weekend trips to CA could be a reality for me! =3

At 6/25/09 05:36 AM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: lol thats barely a civil liberty going to a state where the liberty your geting is actually very limited, sounds like a waste of time and money to me

I guess unless you have felt the pain of being a second class citizen its sort of hard to understand. I want to raise a family and settle down just as much as joe-bible-thumper does. As long as it is not infringing on other's rights, pursuing happiness is what the American dream is all about. It may seem trivial to you, but it is extremely important to me.

At 6/25/09 05:19 AM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: well it doesn't matter anyways if gays got married in a state with gay marriage you would only get the benefits there (like you be considered a family member if some one got in a accident in the hospital and you get full privillages to see them **you know where im going with this**) but if in another state where there isn't gay marriage you dont get that, otherwise its completely worthless.

plus in order to get it federally recoginized you need over half of the US Supreme Court to vote in favor and 2/3 of the Senate to pass it and then get the president to sign off on it. and like that will happen any time soon.

It may seem like a giant hill to climb. But others have faced similar daunting challenges and have overcome. I like to remain optimistic. And if by the time my boyfriend and I graduate college and are ready to settle down nothing has improved, we just may move to a different state.... should we have to. A small price to pay to have all of our civil liberties granted to us.

At 6/24/09 09:22 PM, TrafficPie wrote: I disagree with gay marriage. Men who are gay don't choose to be gay. they will always feel towards men. but gay marriage is against the cause of animals, to reproduce and survive as a species. Overall it is against anything logical for men to be gay.

But it is fine for women to be lesbians... lol

Sorry, no cookie for you Mr. Troll.

I found this old Penn & Teller show episode to be very entertaining. I encourage you to watch it with an open mind and very I'm eager to hear all of your thoughts.

http://www.megavideo.com/?v=B8ZTOU6Y