3,942 Forum Posts by "D2Kvirus"
At 1/18/09 11:54 AM, Doonie wrote:At 1/18/09 11:40 AM, D2Kvirus wrote: If Israel wants peace, better tell them to change their foreign minister, minister for defence, and whoever the hell is writing their dictionaries.It's called democracy.
If Israel wants peace it should destroy the war hungry terror organization, and make Gaza part of the Palestinians authority again. Oh wait.
Hamas were democratically elected, so it is not called "democracy" for Israel to try and blow lumps out of them. And how did Hamas get elected? In response to the Israelis repeatedly trying to shut them down ahead of the last Palestinian elections. If you call that "democracy", there's something wrong with you - but, as we already suspect that, it's hardly news to us.
Oh, by the way, "Arabs(Yes you) want death and war."? You want to verify the theory that I'm Arabic with anyone first? Because, if you did, you'll realise that you just made a remarkably fucking stupid remark - toss it onto the pile with the rest of 'em.I remember reading something that showed you are an Arab. And you are aren't you?
And where the hell did you read that I am an Arab? I want a link, NOW.
Trust me, I think I know which ethnicity and religion I am, and there's three words that describe your theory right now: EPID MOTHERFUCKING FAIL.
I might be dumb because just made no sense at all.Excuses? You mean, REASONS. IT'S CALLED REASONS. Terrorist.Her'es a REASON you should stop typing - you're a fucking idiot, who gets dumber every time everyone (rightly) criticises Israel.
I'll agree only agree with the very last words of this, minus the rightly.
You have yet to give a reason for the Israelis repeatedly shooting at journalists and the UN, despite them being clearly marked as anything but rival military units. Just reminding you.
"Terrorist"? That's rich, and well-informed, coming from a Zionazi...That's rich, and well-informed - coming from a Zionazi...
..*That's rich*, and *well-informed* - coming from a Zionazi-. ...
. You are ridiculously dumb.
Keep supporting fanatic terrorists. Keep supporting war. Keep convincing yourself you are actually doing something good.
Actually, I am so much smarter than you it's painful. I don't call you an ethnicity that you are not, then make up some bullshit to try and back it up that doesn't exist when I'm called up on it because, goddamn, I'm right whilst you're anything but.
Your the one supporting war - you've done it repeatedly in this topic, you unbelievable dolt!
Why the fuck haven't you been banned yet?
At 1/18/09 11:51 AM, Grammer wrote: I don't think it's far fetched to say Israel is a terrorist organization at this point.
Anything far-fetched seems to be coming from the Israelis - they've used the "we've been shot at from UN buildings" twice in the space of a week!
The obvious one here is Woolworths hitting the wall and, as their distribution arm supplied Zavvi, now Zavvi is hitting the wall. The High Street is like a set of dominoes at the moment.
In the space of a week it's gone from -5 to +10 here, which m,eans my cats started maulting on Tuesday. Better hope there isn't another cold snap, or the heating bill is going up...
At 1/18/09 10:29 AM, Doonie wrote:At 1/18/09 10:17 AM, D2Kvirus wrote: You mean they make up ridiculous excuses for shooting at/blowing up anything with the words "UN" or "journmalist" stamped on it?Excuses?
Israel wants peace. Arabs(Yes you) want death and war.
If Israel wants peace, better tell them to change their foreign minister, minister for defence, and whoever the hell is writing their dictionaries.
Oh, by the way, "Arabs(Yes you) want death and war."? You want to verify the theory that I'm Arabic with anyone first? Because, if you did, you'll realise that you just made a remarkably fucking stupid remark - toss it onto the pile with the rest of 'em.
Excuses? You mean, REASONS. IT'S CALLED REASONS. Terrorist.
Her'es a REASON you should stop typing - you're a fucking idiot, who gets dumber every time everyone (rightly) criticises Israel.
"Terrorist"? That's rich, and well-informed, coming from a Zionazi...
At 1/17/09 08:02 PM, reviewer-general wrote: Israel makes things?
Honey, hummus and dreidels.
Fruit orders have already been boycotted since the start of the Gaza operation, too:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,
L-3656454,00.html
(Although people have boycotted Israeli products long before Gaza - me, for example, or the Boycott Israel Campaign)
I thought they just randomly blew shit up. My bad.
You mean they make up ridiculous excuses for shooting at/blowing up anything with the words "UN" or "journmalist" stamped on it?
At 1/11/09 12:43 PM, ijustfudgedyourmama wrote: Tropico is epic
I got bored after a couple of playthroughs, and uninstalled it on my PC to fit on Sim City 4.
There's usually copies floating around on Amazon in the New & Used section.
I just fiddle the votes and live off the Communist dollar until I put my feet up and retire amidst the sort of celebrations I expect from a personality cult, myself.
Laharl.
Come on, he's already served as Overlord of the Netherworld, so he's got a bit of practice in already...
At 1/11/09 12:49 AM, Dawnslayer wrote: He just commissioned the aircraft carrier named after his dad.
I sense a Divine Wind blowing on that one.
But we know he's likely to write a lot of pre-emptive pardons, notably for Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice et al.
At 1/11/09 11:36 AM, Yamor wrote:
I don't know why so many people have had problems with Vista, I use it all the time and it has never crashed and this thing has the speed of a bullet.
My main issue with Vista is their insistance at pissing around with file extensions, so Word documenhts are no longer .doc but .docx, thereby making it impossible to access them with any other version of Windows from time immaterial.
Yes, you can easily change the document to an RTF file, but the majority of people won't know how to do this or why they need to, thus making the whole endeavour a pain in the ass when you have to send and receive attachments on a regular basis.
At 1/10/09 01:28 PM, adrshepard wrote:At 1/10/09 12:50 PM, D2Kvirus wrote: It's not a self defence when it's indiscriminate. If Hamas can keep their rocket attacks focused on military targets, why is it the Israelis seem incapable of being as selective, given their superior firepower and military technology?You are wildly misinformed. Hamas is firing simple, portable, unguided rockets. There is no targeting and they are completely indiscrimate. Israel's weapons are precise against static targets, which is why the air strikes only inflicted about 25-40% civilian casualties. Tank shells and mortars are less accurate and fired in the heat of battle. Mistakes happen, and armies try to avoid it. Hamas' positioning of militants and rocket sites are not making things easier for the IDF, and that is intentional on their part.
Yet Hamas have inflicted less civilian casualties than Israel, despite their "simple" weaponry. Nopw, either they have a hell of a lot of luck, are remarkably good shots, or are at least taking time to aim.
Come on, how doi you shell one of your own tanks from two blocks away? Heat of battle or not, it's common sense that dictates that if it's a tank, it's on your side, so aim either side of it.
That is because the houses were often booby-trapped.
Lety's start with this case: http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Da y/021010/2002101017.html
Were all five houses, the school and the market all boobytrapped?
Which one? When you shell four apartment buildings, you sort of lose the right to say the building is booby trapped - it's FOUR whole apartment buildings, for one.
Or how about the time they were demolishing Arafat's compound with bulldozers? Was that boobytrapped?
No, the quick devastation of the Arab armies in 1948 and in the 70's by the Israelis deprives them of that right. The land belongs to the Israelis now. If you can't accept that, then you can move back to where ever the hell your Germanic ancestors came from before they swept west into the Roman Empire.
No, it does not deprive them of the right to their land, be it the land they gave up in the initial agreements of the borders of the Israeli state or the land they were driven from as the ink was still drying on the agreement.
And the fact is that for every time a pro-Israeli says "What about this, that or the other" as an excuse for everything Israel does, the fact remains that it has only been their land for 60 years, which is nothing compared to those who held the right to it for much longer - so, therefore, you must excuse Hamas for their actions as you can't claim one rule for one but not the other.
And, for your information, as my ancestory is Celtic, I have the right to be where I am (which would be England, if you bothered to check), as my ancestors were here before the Romans, Saxons or Normans, so you've made yourself look like an ass there.
A basic tenet of national sovereignty is the right to secure territorial boundaries. The outposts are intended to keep Gazans out of Israel, which is perfectly legitimate. The Gazans have no natural right to enter Israel.
Is it also a tenet not to allow journalists in, should they report what is actually happening there? Because, if you haven't noticed, very few journalists are in Gaza to give on-the-spot reports right now: the BBC, for example, are on the Israel/Gaza border and reporting what they're fed. Why isn't Israel letting them in? What do they have to hide? And, after all, if they don't like what they read they can just shoot them, asa they do all too regularly:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2003/may /04/israel.middleeastthemedia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/apr /04/middleeastthemedia.israel
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_artic le=3881
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/25 6211
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article 9470.shtml
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article 5946.shtml
http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Da y/020329/2002032937.html
Considering the Israelis were vastly outnumbered by the Palestinians, who started the violence in the first place after the UN declaration, it is not unreasonable that Israel would seek more territory and defensible borders. The victory over the Arab armies from Syria, Egypt, and others certainly gave them reason to fear future attack.
"Seek" is not the same word as "take" - never has been, never will be.
By aggression you are referring to the 1948 war and the one in the 70s. On both occasions Israel was attacked first. I would ask that you identify Israeli acts of aggression after the Yom Kippur War.
I see the Suez Crisis, as usual in these cases, is ignored completely...
That has absolutely nothing to do with the conflict. Hamas is far more in violation of international rules and conventions than Israel arguably ever could be.
Part of the reason Hamas were democratically elected was because Israel managed to give people a(nother) reason to vote for them by trying to prevent voting in East Jerusalem, which was allowed in all previous elections yet suddenly wasn't in 2006 - because Hamas were well supported in East Jerusalem and, as a result, would gain a proportion of seats. They helped Hamas' cuase further by limiting the numbers of Palestinians who could vote, banning Hamas supporters from voting, and closing Hamas election offices.
By doing this, Israel gave the Palestinians a reason to vote for them, making them a(nother) symbol of how Israel oppresses Palestine - so if we want to play the Who Started It game, if Israel left alone there is the possibility Fatah, who recognise Israel (Hamas does not), would still be the ruling party.
I'll get it out of the way ASAP: "Rarely is the question asked, is our children learning."
At 1/10/09 02:24 PM, ThePretenders wrote: Thanks for the messages. I hope this cold spell ends soon.
We've been promised it would "be milder" on Friday, and it was -5 then, -5 yesterday...
Worst Case Zombie Scenario = Dead Set.
Talk about missing two golden opportunities with one stone, which happened to look like a shoddily-written script...
At 1/9/09 09:35 PM, morefngdbs wrote: Obama reparations
Obama sucks
Obamas daughters......
Is it just me noticing this ,or are we waiting for his inauguration to have an official President Obama thread ?
I reckon it's people testing the water to see if it'll be flamebait or not. After eight years of merely typing in the letter "W" beign a guarantee for some mud slinging, we need to be sure!
Fuck Wall Street, I want to know the important news: has the $5bn bailout of the porn industry been approved or not?
At 1/10/09 10:02 AM, Doonie wrote: What's the point of this discussion anyway? It takes you exactly one page to forget the arguments, you already chose your side, so nothing really matters to you.
Obviously you haven't chosen your side, you haven't forgotten any arguments...
Careful who you want to tar with that brush, Doonie - it paints both ways...
At 1/10/09 09:29 AM, D2Kvirus wrote: No, they do not have the "right", for the simple reason that if every nation acted on this "right" at various points in history, the planet would be a mass of bomb craters. Because the IRA wanted Brits out of Ireland dead or alive, is that reason enough to bomb the crap out of Dublin on a daily basis?Exactly, and Israel had this right for like 20 years and we still didn't do anything about it.
A "daily basis", only shows how ignorant you are.
We were getting bombed on a daily basis, this attack is only two weeks long, it's a response, a self defense. It's not bombing for the sake of bombing, it's trying to achieve peace for our citizens already.
Just because you are aware of the conflict every time it appears in the media, doesn't mean it's happening all the time
Hang on, are you telling me at no point in the last 20 years have the Israelis demonstrated aggression towards the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, or whoever else they have elected to be the devils in the region?
It's not a self defence when it's indiscriminate. If Hamas can keep their rocket attacks focused on military targets, why is it the Israelis seem incapable of being as selective, given their superior firepower and military technology? Heck, the Israeli's are even managing to shell their own troops, that's how indiscriminate they are (here). It's also pretty damn indiscriminate when refugee centres are being targetted (here)
It's bombing for the sake of flexing Israeli muscle in Gaza, that's what it is - just like driving tanks through Palestinian settlments (and any houses that happened to be in their path) a decade ago was.
It's happening frequently enough, and often isn't reported in the media - it's when there's a full-blown operation that people will take notice of it, be it Gaza now, Lebanon a couple of years back, or whatever.
Next up: why Israel sholdn't complain when Hamas launch rockets at them for decades of landgrabbing far beyond the borders set for the Israeli state in 1948, or leaving the Palestinians to live in what is, in effect, a concentration camp.Short memory is short, i can actually copy paste my last message that you had no answers to, and they'll still be relevant.
I think you forgot what happened in 1948, when the UN split the land for two, and the Arabs refused it, saying there would be no Jewish state, and declared a total war together against Israel, with the Palestinians. The war has no influence does it? What about Hebron massacre where Palestinians killed dozens of Jews 1920. They were killing Jews all along.
What about the fact that the Arabs put them in these "Concentration camps" (You are disgusting fucker). "Land grabbing", if you haven't noticed, every time we "grabbed" land, we brought it back for peace. Only Palestinians don't want peace, and never did. They want us dead. And you support it. So fuck off
Typical rhetoric: "What about Year X?" Well, what about 1947, when the land was that of the Palestinians? Are you saying they don't have right to land that was theirs for centuries, because of a quick swish of a pen in 1948?
And what makes me a "disgusting fucker"for stating that the Palestinians are in a virtual concentration camp of Israeli design? READ. And if you want to BS your way through with the usual "biased source", try here
Gazans are not allowed to pass through the Erez frontier - by land, air, or sea - and are kept inside by fences, gates - and machine gun posts. What dopes this sound more like, a holiday camp or a concentration camp? Oh, and you may do well to learn the difference between a concentration camp and an extermanation camp, as I detected a hint of that through your faux indignation.
In 1948, the Israeli military drove people out to expand their borders by force - so, no, fuck you if you don't call that a landgrab. And it's hardly peaceful to hand it back, then build settlements on it anyway - that's the diplomatic version of rubbing their noses in it.
How about a person with an AK47 marches in, takes half your residence and stands in the corner with the AK47 pointed at you despite having what they came for, won't you take an opportunity to say you won't be pushed around forever?How about a pony driving in a wheelchair? That's just as relevant.
No, somebody running and ducking for cover when a bombshell is headed their way is relevant - that's the image I have right now, of you ducking the question with the poise of somebody who has no answer.
Yes, they've put up with acting with impunity in Gaza and the West Bank for 60 years. It's really hard for them when the West makes excuses for them, too.The west brought us to this exact situation. We tried peace with them, they failed and missed the opportunity for the who knows what time.
Sometimes, after few years of repression, you just gotta fight back. Pfft, daily basis. This attack would end up in few days anyway, hopefully we will get our goals of keeping our citizens SAFE, unlike Hamas, who wants as many dead Palestinians as possible.
Funny, it seems that Israel are happy to kill Palestinian civilians, and they seem remarkably efficient at it. But, hey, I'm only saying that because it's in the media.
When the hell have Israel ever been repressed by Hamas? It's pretty hard to be repressed when your country receives aid that includes guns and tanks - things that don't appear in aid packages to any other country.
The only repression I'm seeing here is you repressing any outside knowledge that flicks your theories off the table like a crumb - knowledge like Israel being all too happy to be the bullies of the Middle East more than Iran ever could, because Iran have their every move monitored, whilst Israel can continue to use unchecked aggression against whoever they please.
Do you know how Israel can keep their citizens safe? By not creating a situation that would encroach on their safety in the first place. A situation liek, for the sake of argument, constantly flouting international rules & regulations if and when they feel free.
At 1/9/09 08:20 PM, Elfer wrote: This has been the general pattern of modern piracy. Cargo tends to be too bulky to steal, no matter how much it's worth. Who are they going to sell a hundred million dollars worth of stolen oil to?
More importantly, do they even have the facility to unload it from the ship, store it, and sell it off to the highest bidder?
And, if they did, it'd be quite easy to find them and get it back without paying the ransom - by keeping the ship (and crew), it's a bit harder to be gung-ho in trying to retrieve it, as that carries the stigma of killing civilians and possibly/probably causing an environmental catastrophe in doing so.
At 1/10/09 06:26 AM, hippyhunter5 wrote: WAAAAH I don't like Israel because they are killing innocent people WAAAAAH
Way to lose anb argument in your opening gamit...
You fucking idiots Israel has every right to blow the shit out of Gaza, Iran or any such threat. They (Hamas/Iran) have clearly stated they want to destroy Israel and due to this (and attacks launched by Hamas ON INNOCENTS) they have retaliated.
No, they do not have the "right", for the simple reason that if every nation acted on this "right" at various points in history, the planet would be a mass of bomb craters. Because the IRA wanted Brits out of Ireland dead or alive, is that reason enough to bomb the crap out of Dublin on a daily basis?
Israel is not the aggressive party, they merely want to have a peaceful state, if Hamas is stupid enough to attack Israel when all they have is 2 dollar shop rockets they shouldn't go crying to the UN when Israel retaliates with real weaponry.
Next up: why Israel sholdn't complain when Hamas launch rockets at them for decades of landgrabbing far beyond the borders set for the Israeli state in 1948, or leaving the Palestinians to live in what is, in effect, a concentration camp.
In other words, if you attack someone with a knife and they then blow your ass away with an AK it's your own fucking fault.
How about a person with an AK47 marches in, takes half your residence and stands in the corner with the AK47 pointed at you despite having what they came for, won't you take an opportunity to say you won't be pushed around forever?
Given what Israel has put up with I would be perfectly happy if they just got every plane and bomb they owned and just carpet bombed every hostile area till not even a single cockroach was left.
Yes, they've put up with acting with impunity in Gaza and the West Bank for 60 years. It's really hard for them when the West makes excuses for them, too.
Beyond Good & Evil, especially as there's a cliffhanger to sort out.
A new Parasite Eve game'd be cool, too.
At 1/5/09 07:30 PM, jjjok wrote: Tony Hawk. His games are starting to suck. Skate is taking over the skateboard franchise.
Tony Hawk is on life support anyway - the last TH game was Project 8, a couple of years back (unless one totally bypassed me since).
Sonic would be a mercy killing - when was the last truly great Sonic game? By decade, if you can't remember off the top of your head.
FIFA Street needs to die, because it's moronic.
The Smackdown series is phoned in these days, right down to the same commentary for the past three or four games.
But, most of all, Need For Speed needs to be clamped, towed and crushed - garbage every year, without fail.
I want another PoP game in the Sands of Time/Two Thrones universe. You can skip the Warrior Within part, though...
At 1/3/09 03:13 PM, zoolrule wrote:At 1/3/09 03:01 PM, D2Kvirus wrote: Simple: it's classic terror tactics to target civilians. From the Blitz, to Shock & Awe, to the Lebanon skirmishes of a couple of years ago, the aim is smash the morale of the citizens and civillians of the place with which you are warring/bullying.50 innocent civilians out of 400 casualties, in one of the most populated areas in the world seems like targeting civilians to you? Tell me that truth now you little hypocrite.
Excuse me, but where in the name of fuck do you get off?
Fuck your argument, where is the evidence to call me a "hypocrite" coming from, for one? I note Israel's continued use of terror tactics, and you (once more) go for the bullshit hostility route.
The IDF is the most humane army in the world.
They are fucking phoning the civilians before they bomb they bomb hamas structures.
You're aware that the Provo IRA also phoned to allow civilians to leave, before blowing up whatever? The target was blown up, and those who were there could watch it burn. So, were the Provo IRA the mostr humane terrorist group in the world, or just knew that the shock aspect of Shock & Awe is remarkably efficient at achieving the aim?
98% of the attacks hit Hamas structures.
But you just keep on going with that disgusting biased approach.
Wow, that is the funniest thing I've read all day, Mr. Sweetness and Light. The onmly thing disgusting is the attitude of the pro-Israeli posters - outwardly hostile to any criticism of Israel's tactics, no matter how valid.
"Classic terror", these attacks only make them hate Israel more. It contributes nothing.
The only reasons for the attack are to stop the Hamas rockets into Israeli cities.
They use terror tactics, no two ways about it.
And what contributes nothing is bullshit non-arguments that sound almost exactly like yours.
By the way, one Israeli Palestinians died from the Hamas rockets.
Didn't you say 50 civilians died from Israeli rockets?
So, one Palestinian means Hamas are, to use your own argument, more humane - or less indiscriminate in their firing patterns.
No one of you came to talk against the Palestinians who are shooting rockets into Israel for 8 years already.
Because they aren't currently driving tanks deep into Israel right now, for a start. Oh, and the West isn't making excuses for Palestine, nor looking the other way.
Israel is not targeting civilians. Israel does not want to kill civilians, you are so frustrating and i'm almost crying right now.
Well fucking cry then, if this is the kind of crap you proliferate.
At 1/3/09 03:46 PM, Snicp wrote:
you know if Israel was fighting because it was racist they could just erase gaza from the earth in one moment but the fact that all they aiming is the hamas members and the fact that its not that simple because hamas using their civilians as human shields as the guy said
Did I say, at any point, that Israel was racist? No - cut the shit, wrap it in a tortilla, and sell it at Taco Bell.
I stated that Israel was responsible for landgrabs throughout the region, along with their constant provocation and incitement. How dare you pull that kind of crap.
You know, the pair of you would be perfect fits in the Israeli military: provocation and outward hostility to those who you see as being "wrong", yet no interest in showing how you could possibly be "right".
No, I think the novelty will wear off when it turns out he's an empty shill with no policies, and he'll be the first black President to be voited out of office in four years time.
At 1/3/09 11:05 PM, blacklabal wrote: they made us were super small spandex gym uniforms when we forgotten our own and girls would have to were baggy one and me beging the fat one in gum class looked completly stupid
Frankly, I'd got for the baggy option ahead of the rather gay one.
Taking down a few Christmas card the other day, I noticed something: one of them which was supposedly just a Christmas tree had the branches shaped exactly like a Menorah.
Is this another sneak attack by the Stealth Jews?
At 1/3/09 05:25 PM, KemCab wrote:
I'm a week behind. I don't really get the news in English here.
It sounds a lot like the L.A. riots though.
As I keep saying, there's something strange about it:
1992 - Rodney King caught on film being beaten by police, sparking riots in LA
2005 - Jean Charles de Menezes shot by Metropolitan Police, excuses made for across England
2007 - Gabriele Sandri shot by Italian police, sparking riots across Italy
2008 - Alexandros Grigoropoulos shot by Greek police, sparking riots across Greece
Are the majority of Brits happy to make excuses for the police no matter what the evidence to prove they acted unlawfully - are we too Middle Class for righteous indignation or something?
Shin Megemi Tensei: Persona 3
