1,352 Forum Posts by "Commander-K25"
This might be true, but do you have any sources on it? Did the U.S. really put Pol Pot in power, or is this just something you heard or read somewhere?
My top eight:
1. Bush, George W. - US President (100%)
2. Libertarian Candidate (90%)
3. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (70%)
4. Lieberman Senator Joe CT - Democrat (67%)
5. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (64%)
6. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO - Democrat (63%)
7. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH - Democrat (61%)
8. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (56%)
What suprised me is that the Libertarian cantidate wasn't at least tied with Bush.
This is all very theoretical (hopefully).
At 6/30/03 01:06 AM, nailbomb wrote: A certain religious/ethnic group attacks your country but you love your contry therefore you want to kill everyone in that religious/ethnic group.
They don't hate Arabs because they love their country, they hate Arabs because they were attacked by them. Even if they hated their country, they could still have the same feelings.
At 6/30/03 12:27 AM, nailbomb wrote: Isolated I think not.
http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=19264
How does this link to patriotism, though?
At 6/30/03 12:15 AM, BaKsHi wrote: Desert Combat is great....
DC is probably my favorite out of all the mods and even original BF1942 itself. I usually play heavy assault so I can take out choppers and such although the addition of the RPG launchers has me playing regular assault more frequently. Those things are like mobile mortars.
I would describe my playing style as 'mobile camping'. I'll move, then stay and shoot/defend at a point, then move to the next.
EOD is pretty good, but it needs work. The M16's damage is far too low and unrealistic. However, I do prefer the easier EOD helicopter controls to the difficult DC controls. They also need some true foxholes. I do think EOD has more 'flavor', of a sort, in it. The little touches like 'Ride of the Valkyries', the helmet art and slogans and the 60's music on the radio really give it an authentic feel.
My username is 'Commander-K25' most of the time.
At 6/29/03 11:37 PM, BaKsHi wrote: the games sucked too. i'd rather play desert combat or EOD instead of being chased by psychotic people who you think are witches, bitches, or ghosts. [btw is this a flame?]
EOD and DC are incredible! Regular Battlefield 1942 is pretty good too, now that version 1.4 is out. The ew Jap gun owns.
At 6/29/03 01:10 AM, House_Of_Leaves wrote: I've thought about that quite a bit. Honestly? It could be true that God utilized evolution to create us. However, it's said that he created us in his image. I don't think my God is an ape. :)
There's often a lot of contention over the "in his image" statement but can that be taken literally when you're talking about a God without apparent form? I believe that "in his image" refers to modes of thought and patterns of intelligence. We think along the same lines that God thinks, just not on the same scale.
Or, you could take it literally in a different way. If God exists in superspacetime that contains many universes, each universe could potentially be considered akin to an "image", sort of like a disc image. We were created within one of those images.
At 6/29/03 12:17 PM, Crack_Smoker wrote: I could forgive Strom for his views since they were once a popular view, but first he would've had to ask for that forgiveness, or at least admit that what he did was wrong.
Yes, in the age of public apologies that supposedly "make everything right", that might be expected, but remember that he came from a much different time. There's no use in apologising for the past because back then he really did believe in those things. Just because he did not sign a formal document saying "I have changed" means nothing about what he did or thought.
At 6/28/03 04:19 AM, Renegade51 wrote: Heres something about evolution I found interesting. Did you know that in the millions of years cockrotchs (SP? you know those gross things in your apartment) have not evolved at all? That really saying that they have reached there peak, there as strong as they are ever going to get.
That's probably true. Evolution does not have to reach towards complexity or advances as we might think of them. It merely strives to find a niche where that species can thrive. I think we can certainly say that the roach has done that.
At 6/28/03 08:05 AM, Slizor wrote: Ignore Commander, he's just a rightist gun nut
You know, you used to make fairly good arguments. Now you just lie and flame like the rest. Pathetic.
At 6/28/03 01:04 PM, nitroxide wrote
Nobody attacked your group...but as usual you seem to like to start problems were they are not needed the PC/DAG thing...is calm why do you have to be such a fool and try and incite another war.
As usual, you lie to blame everything on me. You're exactly the sort of person I'm talking about.
Funk presented a one-sided view in order to deceive. I responded.
At 6/28/03 01:09 AM, nailbomb wrote: Yes but it was the ones with the knowledge of tools who reproduced while those who had no knowledge of tools became food for predators or died of starvation; technology made us the dominant species but knowledge of technology is what made us evolve
Yes, at first a tool making species had to come about, (evolution of homo sapiens), but as time went by, the tools kept evolving via the skill of the toolmakers, but the toolmakers didn't evolve much physically.
At 6/28/03 02:40 AM, PsychoDoughboy wrote: Generally i expected a bit more mature response from late-night politic forums, but i guess not. i will NOT calm down, because these people believe they are right, everyone else is wrong, and dont relaize religion was created FOR HUMANS BY HUMANS. JEBUS DONT WRITE DOWN ANY OF YOUR SCRIPTURE.
Another "I hate religion" "religious people are stupid, ignorant sheep" rant.
Yawn.
We've had a lot of those lately and frankly you could copy paste someone else's, stick it in here and nobody would be able to tell the difference.
At 6/28/03 02:25 AM, PsychoDoughboy wrote: ....
Here's an idea: calm-yo-asz down.
At 6/27/03 10:06 PM, nailbomb wrote: Actually since any human can procreate, we're not likely to evolve.
True. Technology has probably severely slowed human evolution, in the natural sense.
However, technology is what allowed man to survive, prosper and become the dominant species. We don't physically evolve so much as our technology evolves for us.
It's the old case of adapting to fit your environment, or adapting your environment to fit you. We chose the latter.
At 6/28/03 12:26 AM, nailbomb wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=74097
Quality control you say?
He's not one of ours. He uses the PC logo, but falsely. He was thrown out long ago, for obvious reasons.
At 6/27/03 03:54 AM, TheTio wrote: Oh yeah, Jimsween, this site here http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/ looks so professional it burns my entire amatuer being just go see the address, so it must be credible
Great. You evaluate sources based on their layout and color scheme.
FAS happens to be a quite credible and comprehensive source on everything from conventional weapons to WMDs, to conflicts in every part of the globe. Check out their main page and browse around a bit.
So when I get my hair cut, I can be sued for property damage? No, that's just silly.
What these patents pertain to, is use of certain genes in medical research.
It's easy to write off all aegregationists as bastards, but it's not that simple. He was a man of his time that stood up for a commonly held idea back then. As times changed, so did he. I do no believe that the Strom Thurmond that just died is the same Strom Thurmond as fifty years ago.
At 6/27/03 02:16 PM, nitroxide wrote: My energy theory dint work for you...yet you can believe god made himself?
Where did God come from? We cannot know. All laws of science only apply in this universe, really. Beyond, we cannot even fathom.
I believe God is in the details, in a sense. He exists as information and probability, mainly.
At 6/27/03 01:04 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: What alternative? Why the DAG of course. In the DAG, we're not just a collection of posters...
Skilled debators? More like flamers, spammers, liars and forum miscreants.
You may have "noble goals" but your quality control sucks.
At 6/26/03 01:57 PM, mynameisJonas wrote:At 6/26/03 01:48 PM, Slizor wrote:The real question is who's your daddy?Everyone (and their mothers) is in this movie.Do you need a picture of my mother? Or will you guess?
....and what does he do?
At 6/26/03 03:00 PM, bumcheekycity wrote: Was it really illegal in texas to be gay?
It wasn't really enforced, but then this case came up for some reason and it brought the law's existence to light.
At 6/24/03 07:10 AM, TheTio wrote: Russia - 18000 WMD
18,000 and moving fast! Prices are low, no money down! Supplies limited so get your genuine Soviet nuke today!
At 6/25/03 12:50 AM, bumcheekycity wrote: Can colleges favour White students for no reason at all?
Certainly not. If they did that it would be "racism".
See the double standard?
Mr. al-Sahaf has another statement regarding this matter of "goats":
At 6/25/03 12:26 AM, bumcheekycity wrote: Who's seen http://www.welovetheiraquiinformationminister.com ? now thats a funny site.
Yeah, that's absolutely hilarious, but the link is http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/
At 6/24/03 11:37 PM, Lyddiechu wrote: A .45 sounds eeexcellent I would want something with the most stopping power possible.. plus I am more interested in blowing off an arm or a leg than actually killing the person.
"Richie loved to use 22s because the bullets are small and they don't come out the other end like a 45, see, a 45 will blow a barn door out the back of your head and there's a lot of dry cleaning involved, but a 22 will just rattle around like Pac-Man until you're dead."
-Vincent Antonelli (Steve Martin), from My Blue Heaven (1990)
At 6/24/03 10:40 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: Weren't we supposed to keep a lid on Ted and the goats? I thought we weren't supposed to talk about that...do you wanna have to answer a bunch of questions and lie to the authorities again? Damn it people!
Don't worry, I've hired the master of denial as the PC spokesperson:
