Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Depending on what show it is you'd probably save money if you spent a month on hulu+ or netflix.

At 3/14/13 09:43 AM, IGreenI wrote: Why on earth would anyone need a $1mill home; 5 watches; 3 cars; $120 haircuts.? These questions have kept me up many a night, but usually I just poke my head out on the back porch and fire off a full clip from my AR 15, then I feel right as rain.

So, not a shotgun?

I believe Dolan would need to be a Catholic to be Pope, sauce plox.

Oh I just looked up the name of the guy.
He's called Timothy Dolan.

Oh his original name, I'm disappoint.

At 3/13/13 11:03 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote:

At 3/13/13 10:36 PM, BleachFanatic12 wrote:

At 3/13/13 09:44 PM, Travis wrote: What am I reading?

13, Male
Angel Island,Mobius
3/31/12

Oh, now it makes sense.

Mobius as in The Matrix?

Mobius as in the mobius strip?

I prefer the term "band"

At 3/14/13 04:42 AM, Ononymous wrote: Meh, I'm sad Mr. Dolan was not elected as pontiff.
I actually caught myself referring to him as Uncle Dolan rather than Pope Dolan in a random conversation today.

But anyway I'm an atheist so what he does won't directly impact itself on me.

I believe Dolan would need to be a Catholic to be Pope, sauce plox.

At 3/14/13 01:14 AM, The-iMortal wrote: What's the best/most affordable website for renting tv series online? Pay per episode, like iTunes.

Why would you want to pay per episode when you can get a monthly thing save money then unsub when you are done watching?

Pulp Fiction, without a doubt.

At 3/14/13 12:55 AM, Korriken wrote: Well gee, that didn't last long.

I tried to find the funny, I couldn't.

..The only bad movies I watch, are the ones that are so bad they are good...

At 3/12/13 07:37 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: I love em. there dicks at first but once they get to know ya they are real cuddly!

THREAD NEEDS MOAR CASTIEL

Thank you

At 3/13/13 09:35 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: This was illegal, you make a document saying that you legally gave your right to allow an abortion, yet you fall back on that, it's illegal. Moral, yes, but none the less illegal.

Depends on what your morals are. I consider going back on an agreement where I knowingly signed away something that may conflict with me morally, immoral and dishonest.

I can't seem to find any EBF4 files, and my saves were gone a couple hours later without me cleaning the files =/ that sucked.

Oh no, I'm so affected by the man behind the curtain.

At 3/13/13 04:48 AM, Coldworks wrote:

At 3/12/13 11:33 PM, TracyJacksonTAW wrote: What do you guys think about it? I've just done all the campaign missions and saw all the cinematic, and thought it was a good game all and all.

Sure, it seems like a good game, but 40â'¬ for a bloody expansion pack that's NOT a standalone... I don't think so.
I'll buy the battle chest when it's at a single game price, thank you very much.

It has enough content in the single player to be comparable to the size of WoL, seems fine to me.

At 3/13/13 04:01 PM, Cyberdevil wrote:

At 3/13/13 01:35 PM, Drakogen wrote: Oh dont get me wrong, I've played and beaten all the EBF games and I love them... Aftet I beat EBF4 I had to write this for the sole purpose of the fact that some of the things are'nt as great as EBF3.... for instance the Menu used to be alot simpler... and they didn't cut your abilities in half like they did in this one

Maybe cutting the abilities was an attempt at simplification? What do I know though, heh, guess I should play that game before further indulging myself in the discussion. :) But the keyboard option is definitely an improvement no matter how you look at it.

Fourth character added probably took up file space and cuts needed to be made.

It bothers me that the "full game" is paid for on kong..

Any thread where superghandi is a majority of the posts.

Should of asked someone to make it for you / told them

Happy B day Entice

At 3/13/13 06:04 PM, Provoke wrote: I never did like twinkies anyway. In fact, most Hostess/Little Debbie products taste awful.

I like nutty bars >>

At 3/11/13 04:57 PM, Camarohusky wrote: That soda rule was pretty stupid. Definitely not the right way to promote health. It's one thing to ban an activity that harms others aside from the user, or to limit a substance that is inserted by a manufactuerer or cooker prior to consumer handling of the product, but it's quite another thing to ban an activity that is caused by the consumer and only harms the consumer. On top of that, banning quanity is hardly a real measure as 2+2 = 4, so insted of getting 1 size 4 they couldjust get 2 size 2s and they have bypassed the ban at little extra cost.

You didn't even mention the part where the ban wasn't effecting all businesses in the state. Like the CNN article mentions it wouldn't have effected 7/11 which is state regulated, not city.
http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/11/news/companies/soda-ban/inde x.html?hpt=po_c2

At 3/14/11 12:37 AM, Light wrote: i think the op is relly stupid.

Hes So Stoopid It Relly Maks Me want To loose It u No? he is suc A looser. i just cant beleve anyone Coudl b botherd By tis kind Of crap.

At 3/10/13 11:31 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 3/10/13 08:16 PM, Ceratisa wrote: Wrong, that was not what was defined, stop changing what was actually said. It wasn't partisan.

Sorry, but saying "fuck Eric Holder" when Eric Holder bashing is a very popular trend amongs partisan groups is just partisan fuckery. Merely talking bad about a government official never will count as an imminent threat and you know it.

I misunderstood you then and I apologize, you are right at least currently in this country. (We can't know the future)

At 3/11/13 12:22 AM, Warforger wrote:

At 3/10/13 10:17 PM, Ceratisa wrote: If you paid attention he said he didn't care of it was a drone of a bullet. The focus around drones was based on the statement that drones could be used like that.
And no, they specifically said over and over again this wasn't about people who could be considered combatants.
You are basically talking about a different subject.

Oh please you know that it's about Drones, if drones hadn't been around you know this filibuster wouldn't have happened and no one would have challenged the President's ability to kill citizens without due process on US Soil.

If drones hadn't been specifically mentioned by Holder it wouldn't of been the focus. And the bull you are trying to pass is in direct conflict with what was said by more then one Senator.

He didn't really come off as a shill. I think he was just being nicer then he had to.

At 3/10/13 09:07 PM, Warforger wrote:

At 3/7/13 02:52 AM, Ceratisa wrote: It isn't about killing people, it is about a violation of the 5th amendment. Drones are simply the new platform for which these assassinations can take place. Please stop distracting from the point. Only one real question was being asked, and I've already said it.

The thing is that whether it's a drone strike or not shouldn't matter. The government has always been able to kill people and drone strikes get treated unfairly just for that.

But that isn't what is being said at all Warforger. And I've already said it wasn't. I've already said THEY weren't talking about that.

The question then should be whether or not the US government or state governments can kill someone without due process, at this point there are several scenario's where this has happened like say in a rebellion or a wanted fugitive or a guy who's shooting up a mall.

If you paid attention he said he didn't care of it was a drone of a bullet. The focus around drones was based on the statement that drones could be used like that.
And no, they specifically said over and over again this wasn't about people who could be considered combatants.
You are basically talking about a different subject.

At 3/10/13 05:33 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 3/10/13 11:57 AM, LazyDrunk wrote: So where do you think the fool line becomes the imminent threat line?

At the line of an actual threat, not just partisan fuckery.

Wrong, that was not what was defined, stop changing what was actually said. It wasn't partisan.

At 3/9/13 04:01 PM, BrockManson wrote: Seriously, do you actually put anything into society? I really hope you're a troll.

I do. I contribute to society with my art, most notably the music my band makes. As for the second, no I'm not.

So basically you contribute nothing at all..

But America has a different standard you use to measure political wings. You have to keep that in mind. We have, since our creation becoming increasingly left wing.

Pretty terrible since I've been in a relationship for 7 years..

3 was honestly fine, I think people are just upset Gat died.

At 3/9/13 09:41 PM, Omegeist wrote:

At 3/7/13 03:19 AM, Ceratisa wrote: Eh wish I had a sig, but I don't really have the ability to make a nice one for myself. (Bad at that stuff)

Ik, yours would never amount to the skill visible in mine anyway

Don't need to rub it in..