Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/24/13 10:45 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Rebel would need shitload of sarin to kill 1000 individuals. It is extremly toxic,

Less then 500 dead according to aid groups

At 8/25/13 01:49 PM, Warforger wrote: Oh and I forgot to mention, Hezbollah is already in this, in fact they're the reason Al-Assad is still around.

Oh and WWIII has been expected ever since 1945, kind of a cry wolf situation at this point.

Pretty sure WWIII was only expected around 1949 when the USSR became a nuclear power.

At 8/24/13 07:42 PM, SneakyGameBoy wrote: Saints Row IV. I love the series and I don't like the direction they are taking with it's story but the game is TONS OF FUN! It's like a fun sandwich and inside it, it has fun meat, and some good fun condiments.

But seriously, where do they go from here?

At 8/24/13 07:45 PM, Light wrote: I wonder if Russia is supplying the Syrian government as part of an overarching plan to regain superpower status.

Just speculating.

Everyone is supplying EVERYONE. Syria is a key ally in the area.

Oh Feo we already know the Saudi's support the "rebel" movement.

Carla Del Ponte said evidence from casualties and medical staff indicated that rebel forces in the civil war had used the deadly nerve agent sarin.
‘Our investigators have been in neighbouring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals, and there are strong, concrete suspicions, but not yet incontrovertible proof, of the use of sarin gas,’ said Del Ponte in an interview with Swiss-Italian television.
‘This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.’
So rebels use Sarin gas and would obviously have more then a single canister. (Your evidence)
If the rebels according to you do make any gains them gaining access to chemical weapons is quite possible and you know it.

And honestly Feo comparing riot deaths to a weaponized chemical or neurological agent is absurd in the eyes of the international community and you know it.

Do you have a source on the rebels actually gaining ground most recently? Because I can't find anything about serious solid gains being made by them.

Like I said more support Assad right now in Syria then don't.

Why would the rebels do it? Same reason they did the other attacks, to get the international community to stop Assad by pinning it on him.

At 8/24/13 04:28 PM, Angry-Hatter wrote:

At 8/24/13 04:18 PM, Ceratisa wrote:

Society has a right to be entertained.

No, it doesn't.

Pursuit of happiness.

Entertainment =/= happiness.

You mean entitlement =/= pursuit because Entertainment is a source of happiness for some and that isn't really debatable.

Society has a right to be entertained.

No, it doesn't.

Pursuit of happiness.

At 8/24/13 03:49 PM, Feoric wrote: I don't think too many people are saying it was a chemical attack, so Dan is correct as he is a chemical weapons expert. It's largely agreed upon that whatever was used was a nerve gas attack.

Can you explain to me why Assad would use a nerve gas after finally getting the U.N. team in there? Or why when he has been WINNING territory and the conflict itself, he would hit the civilian population instead of "rebel" forces.

Why would he use nerve gas when he is currently more popular than the "rebels."

The "rebel" forces are the only ones suspected of actual use of chemical or neurological agents according to analysts is my understand.

DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — Syrian state media accused rebels of using chemical arms against government troops in clashes Saturday near Damascus, while an international aid group said it has tallied 355 deaths from a purported chemical weapons attack earlier this week.

"One message cited a Syrian TV journalist embedded with the troops in the district who said the army confiscated an arms cache that included several barrels with "made in Saudi Arabia" stamped on them. It did not say what was in the barrels, but appeared to suggest that some sort of chemical agent was inside and supplied by Saudi Arabia, the region's Sunni Muslim power and a staunch supporter of Syria's Sunni-led revolt."

But I understand just how much control over the media Assad can flex, so we can take that however we want. But many sources agree Assad's forces themselves were exposed.

Dan Kaszeta, a former officer of the U.S. Army's Chemical Corps and a leading private consultant, pointed out a number of details absent from the footage so far: "None of the people treating the casualties or photographing them are wearing any sort of chemical-warfare protective gear," he says, "and despite that, none of them seem to be harmed." This would seem to rule out most types of military-grade chemical weapons, including the vast majority of nerve gases, since these substances would not evaporate immediately, especially if they were used in sufficient quantities to kill hundreds of people, but rather leave a level of contamination on clothes and bodies which would harm anyone coming in unprotected contact with them in the hours after an attack. In addition, he says that "there are none of the other signs you would expect to see in the aftermath of a chemical attack, such as intermediate levels of casualties, severe visual problems, vomiting and loss of bowel control."

Steve Johnson, a leading researcher on the effects of hazardous material exposure at England's Cranfield University who has worked with Britain's Ministry of Defense on chemical warfare issues, agrees that "from the details we have seen so far, a large number of casualties over a wide area would mean quite a pervasive dispersal. With that level of chemical agent, you would expect to see a lot of contamination on the casualties coming in ,and it would affect those treating them who are not properly protected. We are not seeing that here."

Why are people making light of this? Think about what this man would have gone through on Okinawa a battle so harsh none of us will probably experience anything close to it in our lifetimes. Then he got beaten to death at home by 2 black teens.

At 8/23/13 04:26 AM, Light wrote: Camarohusky is going to destroy you with his logic once he sees this.

Sorry but while Camaor's pasting may seem impressive he often doesn't actually understand the law he is pasting. Look at Zimmerman for the most recent example.

For the record the US establishing a no FLY zone would not only be expensive, but ineffective. We'd need bombings at LEAST to give Al Qaeda the edge. (Which is becoming a more dominant force in the "rebel" movement and that isn't even denied by the rebels themselves.

At 8/23/13 02:25 PM, argile wrote:

At 8/23/13 02:05 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: ohh hey look at the suspects there's a surprise!

Black on white hate crimes have been accumulating alot since obama's inaugerations haven't they?

No man, this was for TRAYVON.

At 8/23/13 02:05 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: ohh hey look at the suspects there's a surprise!

Oh hey look at Oklahoma too, Tony make a race bias topic in politics, kidding, I already know the excuses the other side would make.

At 8/22/13 12:18 PM, Satan wrote: No matter what year we all joined, we are all slowly killing Newgrounds.

Yeah but those 01'ers are doing the most damage rite?

Silent Hill 2 (The series itself is good) and Amnesia really the only scary ones. Silent Hill gets trippy when you look up the enemies and their reason for existing after you beat it.

At 8/22/13 11:06 PM, exudaz wrote: You want to talk about starcraft?
Bitch, you'll cry when you see my terran build order. MMM rushing your ass and banshee assaulting half your troops.

Diamond league, motha fuka. Been playing since 2010.

But seriously, I play that game 4 hours per sitting. Love it.

I think he's talking about SC1 brah..

At 8/23/13 11:21 AM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 8/22/13 08:47 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: so Egypt did get those M1A1 Abram tanks!

Actually, those appear to be a newer variant of the M60 Patton tank, not the Abrams.

I'm pretty sure we've already supplied then Abrams anyway http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_of_the_modern_Egyptian_Army#Armored_fighting_vehicles

I'd reference Fallout 2's but that is basically a "A Kiss to Build a Dream On" Performed by Louis Armstrong, and that isn't fair.

As opposed to the other ACTUAL attacks on police stations and bombings and fire bombings, Feo.

I'm sorry popular revolution isn't something you back though.

He just learned about it in school?

I'm sorry we now have actual footage available to the provocation of these "protesters," And people want to say the military is overreacting when the MB rioters are biting off more then they can chew.

Just beat Saints Row IV last night, did every event and mission/activity, seemed short.

Should we just cut and paste everything from the other thread since this is basically going to go the same way with no one having an actual point against the 2nd.

It is a shame the game has aged so poorly though..

I'm sorry, did you say they were unarmed? Because that isn't true we know at least some of them have arms and are activley using them against military forces.

At 8/19/13 06:27 PM, lolomfgisuck wrote:

At 8/19/13 04:37 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: it may be a loophole but its one that can't be fixed seeing as it infringes on to many rights and no one will give it up in the name of "safety" seeing as gun crime is reletivally low.

it can be fixed... you just refuse to fix it.

You CANNOT control private sales.

Millions of Americans choose not to have healthcare because they don't need it though. I'm not saying it is the case for everyone. Some of them just don't want to be insured because they are healthy. Under Obamacare there isn't really any to change that until you are sick, then the benefits come easier.

Light you don't have a honest understanding of modern military weaponry, it is impossible to have a conversation with you when you don't understand the limits of an AH-64 or the MQ-1.

At 8/12/13 01:33 PM, VinnyXY wrote: Yes.

We got help alright, from "them".

Needs the caption