At 11/6/09 07:10 PM, jtm17 wrote:
At 11/3/09 05:31 PM, BlueFlameSkulls wrote:
At 11/3/09 04:59 PM, jtm17 wrote:
Now im not saying the game will be "bad" but if we say that on metacritic (i hate the site but come on) it has an average of 94 then this has to be bettter?! what is it going to be a 99? because this really isnt uncharted 2....
MW2 Response Splurge
MW2 Response response
Really the single player is half of CoD4. I saw a stream and it reminds me of how goddamn short Mirror's Edge was.
The multiplayer does have some nice additions. I can't really fault the mutliplayer other than the nuke kill streak. It promotes campers and can ruin a good game. If it killed the other team but still continued the game then I would be a fantastic addition.
I probably pick it up used out of principle. I just don't agree with activision's AND IW's methods. Seriously they destroyed the PC version for no reason. Some of the things they come up don't even benefit them in anyway.
So far:
9v9 max players
No dedicated servers
No option to kick players
No dev console
"Special" features for PC include grapics settings, mouse support and text chat
No party chat for 360
100 MS mean "great" ping
No mod tools
Price hike
And to top it off calling their customers "Nerds" for objecting to their methods
There's a shit load of stuff but I'll link you to this interview
http://forums.bestbuy.com/t5/Gaming/Call -of-Duty-Modern-Warfare-2-Live-Chat-Sess ion-Transcript/td-p/67692
Everything in that shows you how much they're testing the waters to see how many idiots buy their product when they remove features that have been in PC games for 15 years.
Also I love this picture
