Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/9/04 03:09 PM, southwest_strangla17 wrote: piconjo took pikanjos name. pikanjo made the perfect kerby series and piconjo took that and made the pervert kerby series. lets see he steals a name and someone elses movie ideas. LFs style doesnt look anything like the simpsons, people just say that to have a reason to hate LF. piconjo has talent but he likes to be a little dick.

what are you talking about? piconjo has been on newgrounds longer thank pikanjo. piconjo comes from pico + pwns + j00. you sound like a total idiot saying that the pervert kirby movies aren't original when the perfect kirby series are using characters from video games you think kirby is a newgrounds character? yeah and so is joanna dark. idiot. why do you think piconjo makes fun of that series? if its overrated he parodies it.
and the reason why legendary frog's style doesnt look anything like the simpsons style is because he can't draw. its just circle tool and tweens. besides its not the drawings he steals from its the jokes. check in return of ganondorf on the bookshelf it says something like "how to steal from the simpsons and get away with it by legendary frog." at least he admits to it unlike the creators of the perfect kirby series.

is piconjo really working on the johnny rocketfingers game? I haven't talked to piconjo in a long time and I was wondering if anyone else knew anything about this. since he does work on pixar movies does this mean that johnny rocketfingers is going to be 3d? I think that'd ruin the style.

that game was pretty fun but it was really really basic. just click on something on the screen until you got a _root.play() command. a full version would be better because they could get some people who know how to program to make it a lot longer than a few minutes. I would love to see Piconjo help make it, he is the ultimate in perverted stick figure movies.

At 8/2/04 07:35 PM, ref wrote: um, no it isen't. I don't think kid sites have hentai ads and porn in the site, with violence in every other flash, and where swearing is allowed.

tom fulp is getting rid of the hentai ads, many of them are gone already. porn is not allowed on the site. violence and swearing is PG-13 which means newgrounds is for 13 year olds. many of the movies that have the content you mentioned were removed.

At 8/2/04 07:25 PM, NeWsPaPeRmAn wrote: THis is not a place for kids you fucking idiot

says the 17 year old. another year until you're allowed here.

which do you prefer, the cartoony Xombie series or the grittier Dead Rain series? I think Dead Rain is better because SickDeathFiend looked hawt in that Hitler movie but also because theres a lot more gore in Dead Rain.

J00 all haff b33n pwn3d to the penor degree.

piconjo and his loyal army has stuffed their penors in the portals buttz and the portal liked it.

piconjo>j00

Remember, Piconjo <3's j00 all so smile <3 piconjo back, and then we will have have teh happiest efor. the end/

Piconjo pwns everything then Dead Rain then I'd rather nail my face to the floor instead of watching something like waterman.

Piconjo is obviously the best animator on newgrounds. he parodies the most overrated artists everyone thinks is the best and he always makes his parodies better looking than the actual movies.

my nipples are like 2 erect lil dicks protruding from my bra!

that movie made my nipples hard

At 7/8/04 05:28 PM, LegendaryFrog wrote: At least you could be orginal in your silly hoax.

at least you could be original with your silly movies.

i noticed this pic was posted before and synj cried to tom to delete it, but i want to make a topic just about the pic.

so what do you think? I think synj is a big fat copy cat booger face.

the whistle was a good idea, the problem that it is controlled by the general newgrounds audience, which, as a whole, are complete idiots.

whistles abuse examples:

1)imported graphics were used therefore the whistle abusers said the entire movie was stolen

2)if it has gay pornography in it (guy on guy), it will not be blown if it is girl on girl or guy&girl or just girl. sexism is as bad as racism and racism on newgrounds means a ban.

3)offensive material could mean anything from a certain gesture to a drawing of a certain person. most of the time the whistle will be blown just because the viewer did not like the movie and knows their vote of 0 will not blam it.

I hope abused whistles will supsend the abusive whistler's ability to blow the whistle then if continued their ability to vote will be suspended.

At 6/20/04 04:24 PM, BigBlueBalls wrote: My point was how you were getting upset about people being hard on you, yet you don't mind being hard on LF.

I was upset because I can't show my movies to the people who enjoy watching them.

Anyway, I'm getting a little off topic here, my point is um I don't know I just want to see TheWeebl getting ass raped by a badger in a movie. Now THAT's a parody I would vote 5 on :)

wow talk about a contradiction. oh no, I hope the admins remove your post from the BBS, it's attacking an artist. I hate that gay weebl too. he was going to be my next target, but the movie would just be flagged, so what's the point? penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis, mushroom mushroom.

At 6/20/04 05:14 AM, BigBlueBalls wrote: I mean would you mind people posting flash about you, showing you getting ass raped?

that would turn me on.

and to the people who think GreatTeacher is me, you really are stupid, you think it's impossible for more than one person to not like legendary frog? ask a mod to check IP address if you want, we're not the same people.

funny livecorpse was mentioned, there are a few movies that say for him to burn in hell show very offensive things about him. they need to be removed, as long as they're in the portal and my movie isn't, Tom & Wade are hypocrites.

sorry about what I posted before I am bipolar and you men wouldn't understand about the other reason anyway. most of you will be happy to hear that I probably won't be submitting anymore movies, at least not to newgrounds. I will still post on the BBS about how legendary frog sucks, it's a lot easier than making a movie saying it in a creative way.

At 6/19/04 11:18 PM, Jimmy_Kimmell wrote: Give her the benefit of the doublt she might surprize us.

I make contraversial movies if they're not welcome here I can just find some other place to submit. NG is ok for watching movies but it's not artist friendly. sorry for all the people who enjoy my movies, I can't do anything about that.

I made valid points, I asked valid questions, I asked for clearer rules for submitting movies so mistakes like this can't happen. too many people are coming down too hard on me, put everything else I said previously aside and just see the person that I am, poxpower was right I'm a nobody here, I'm being held back. all I ever wanted to do was make movies that made people laugh and I succeeded in that and was told I cannot do that. I'm sorry, I think my dreams have come to an end. I'm sorry I'm crying.

At 6/19/04 10:58 PM, WelcomeToLife wrote: i just flagged your last submission. it was a loop of the phrase "legendary frog sucks." you can't sit there bitching about your flash not staying in the portal after something like that.

that was a special gift for poxpower, he said I couldn't make movies and I showed him up.

quit whining, stop being jealous of legendary frog

maybe I'm not jealous. maybe it's just that he makes stupid moves that are overrated. if I only wanted to make fun of artists I'd be jealous of I'd be making fun of Adam Phillips. you know why I don't? because he doesn't need to use video game characters to gain popularity, he doesn't need to steal jokes from the Simpsons. he doesn't need to be taken off his high horse. legendary frog is obviously the best target for a good hazing.

At 6/19/04 10:43 PM, -poxpower- wrote: interesting that you would change subject so easily. when in reality, you suck and your movie was a piece of crap. And you're a cybaby.

change subject? your entire subject is your blatantly stupid opinion that I suck and am I crybaby, the subject you throw at many people here on the BBS to make yourself feel better rather than put your time into doing something with your time that makes yourself a better person.

I beg to differ. Look at the portal. There are BAZILLIONS of shitty entries. What do you think "Turd of the week" is?

honoring the survivor. you don't give a war veteran a purple heart because he's a bad soldier.

That wasn't the point. He did it for HIS OWN SITE, insulting PUBLIC FIGURES recognized by millions and who didn't contribute to his flash community in any way. Plus his movies were classy and good ( at the time). <= ha ha admit your failure

and I made one for his site. it doesn't matter about how famous the celebrity is, like anyone has heard of Lloyd Kaufman, but Tom Fulp would probably get a kick out of seeing him in a controversial Flash movie. LF isn't famous, but he's a local celebrity, shut up about there being a difference because there isn't.

On the other hand, you just bitch at someone who puts a lot of effort into making GOOD flash

you're not the one who determines what's good and bad. who is? the NG audience. if it doesn't get blammed it's good enough for the portal... now how puts hard work into a good movie?stfu

And in relative good taste.

hypocrite. "relative" is your own opinion. I know you made a Piconjo movie where he sucks his own penis. lol. stfu you moron.

lol again I haven't see your piece of crap, but I'm guessing it didn't get a 1.33 score for nothing.

is it that hard for you to believe that it had a higher score before the toadies gathered together and blammed it? no its not, what you're doing is DENYING that it had a higher score. I can 0 your stupid movies every day and bring it down to 0.00 and say "look, it's a crappy movie" and does that make it a crappy movie? again, stfu.

Just because I admire LF as an animator, doesn't mean I suddely can't see if your movie is crap. IT WAS PATHETIC and didn't even make it to turd of the week.

check what is TotW, NOTHING. You know why? Because my movie was REMOVED! you just made yourself look like such a moron. that really made my day. thank you.

never said you had problems insutling people, just said you were pissed now that it was DENIED to you.

enjoy the new LF movies I made. they were made especially for you. I can make as many as I want and will continue to do so as long as you say I cant. stfu thank you very much.

At 6/19/04 08:13 PM, -poxpower- wrote: I dont read posts I reply to fart fart fart

I think the whole problem comes from us not having seen you movie. Well me. But It's a sure bet that it was a steaming pile of crap that BARELY passed judgement.

looking at your favorite artists (legendary frog) it's no wonder you would just jump to the conclusion it was a piece of crap that barely passed judgement. thanks for your blind opinion but nobody wants to hear it.

So you produce pure crap

a pure crap movie wouldn't have passed judgement.

You compare this with Tom's assassin movies, but you forget that he actually did something cool back then

Tom's assassin movie: degrading celebrities. My movie: degrading celebrities. you make such a good point my dear friend I'm sure the echoing laughters are not directed at you.

And the title STRONGLY suggests just what big blue balls said, you're a bitter whiny no-talent hack

and your favorite authors lists shows why you're posting your insults. for as bad as I am you're much worse. I put creativity into my insults of a flash artist, you just lazily type BS here that makes you look like an idiot.

who is pissed because he can't insult who he wants on a private website.

really? I have no problems insulting you, maybe it's because you're a nobody that doesn't have 1000's of fans to tell to blam my movie.

At 6/19/04 07:49 PM, Jimmy_Kimmell wrote: Today were not allowed to make fun of other flash artist and next we'll be not allowed to include homosexual content within a flash.
We need Stronger rules on adult submissions so we know what is and is'nt acceptable.

wow a decent post. I wish wade would follow in your example instead of flaming the artists who are working for free for this site. wade, please take the time you spent "attacking" the artists here and put that time into making clearer rules so people can stop wasting their time submitting, complaining, and removing movies.

At 6/19/04 07:13 PM, BigBlueBalls wrote:

Oh BTW AbortedFetus I was just fucking with ya. I know what pass judgement means, I've been here for almost two years to know this shit.

you do a really good n00b impression. must have had a lot of practice.

My point was, obviously if it dropped after judgement, people didn't like it so it should have been blammed anyway.

and my point was that it wasn't blammed because it wasn't a bad movie and dropped in score after the legendary frog fans mustered their forces. it shows that good movies can be brought down in score and that if you complain enough a good movie can be removed. I made very valid points, if the 13 year olds found it offensive they shouldn't have been watching an AO movie.

Either way, justice was done and something that should have got blammed in the first place is gone.

you didn't like the movie is the only reason why you said "it should have been blammed in the first place" and you completely ignore that it wasn't removed by process of voting it off the portal which means there is a problem with the voting processess or the audience nowhwere in the rules does it say we cannot make fun of celebrities, not even minor online artist celebrities (I'll mention Tom Fulp's Assassin now). it'd be stupid for people to waste time making movies that will make the admins waste time having to remove if you ignore that problem than you're obviously just being stupid.

At 6/19/04 06:48 PM, BigBlueBalls wrote: With a score of 1.33? Funny, I thought that means it's blammed :-/ Oh and it is.... What's your fucking problem? People blam shit they don't want here, simple as that so stop complaining.

you are quite an idiot, it passed judgement then it was REMOVED, Wade even said that it was removed, it wasn't blammed. I wasn't whining about it getting blammed, I was making a point of its removale, if my movie is removed then a large portion of the flash movies with the same content should be as well. but they're not because artists are being dictated as to what can and cannot be submitted even if it passes judgement. it's a clear sign that newgrounds does not want hard work and a good movie, they want the movies shown to be about specific content which robs the artist of their freedom and will make this site suck and the artists and audiences leave.

oh no I'm "attacking" him!

At 6/19/04 04:20 PM, KupaMan wrote: Okay, someone's retarded. If a level one blows the whisle on your video, it doesn't mean that it will get removed.

that was an example of the "level 1 n00b" who doesn't know anything about newgrounds, I wasn't going into whistle point calculations. quit complicating things with your dumb posts. you've obviously proved that a level 10 person can still be a n00b.

it doesn't matter whether they're level 1 or level 10; if it breaks any rules, it will get removed.

that's my point, it doesn't matter if it breaks the rules, it just matters how many idiots will use that whistle. Bitey of Brackenwood could have been removed from the portal if enough idiots whistled it. and it takes forever for a movie to get reviewed to get unflagged because there's so many and so few people looking over them that most flagged movies are still waiting to be reviewed.

At 6/19/04 03:54 PM, MALforPresident wrote: i watched it, didn't tickle my fancy. but if some people thought it was offensive, and then the admins thoght so, well, sucks for you.

it sucks for the entire newgrounds community. artists will be forced to create G rated movies in fear that their hard work will be deleted and the whole site will fall from there.

not to mention, there is no freedom of speech on newgrounds, its a privately owned site. so its futile to fight the admins on the matter.

I never mentioned freedom of speech, go back and read my posts then maybe you'll have something worth listening to. my point is that the system this site is using does not work. if this continues then the site will lose the artists and audience and we become defunct which is something none of us want.

4)losing whistle points doesn't deter anyone from abusing it. why do you think there's a problem?

i've never noticed any problem, anyone else?

Flash by MALforPresident:
- none -

no wonder you didn't notice a problem.

At 6/19/04 03:39 PM, MALforPresident wrote: all your going to accomplish by trying to defend your shitty work in here is being flamed

see you attack the work as if it were badly made, it was well animated. just because you didn't find it entertaining doesn't mean it should be "offensive."
point being:

1)it PASSED JUDGEMENT it was a good movie with a good score until legendaryfrog fans blammed, and reviewed zero. because of them there is not a decent scoring movie that would find it's audience.
2) this movie took many many long hours and hard work to make and it is completely wasted because of a few 13 year olds worship legendaryfrog. how about you write a novel or paint a picture and some religious zealot burns it because it's "offensive." how would you feel?
3) it was AO (adults only), legendaryfrog fans are 10 to 13 years old and shouldn't have been watching that.
4)losing whistle points doesn't deter anyone from abusing it. why do you think there's a problem?

attention NG members, the censorship on Newgrounds has escalated to new heights. the whistle feature seemed like a great new feature to mark movies that auto-spawn popups or other maliciousness. but now the whistle has become a tool of abuse, people use it instead of voting 0 because voting 0 does not guarentee a blam, but blowing the whistle will remove the movie from the portal. now a level 1 idiot can remove a movie from the portal.

on what grounds are movies being whistled unjustly? mainly because the movies are offensive. "offensive" is subjective, the movie has nudity, offensive, the movie has homosexual references, offensive, the movie has vulgar language, offensive, the movie makes fun of Mega Man, offensive.

I am speaking from experience, me and my co-author's last movie I made looked like it looped at the end so the viewer would not watch the entire thing and vote on the movie based on animation, graphics, sound, etc instead of personal opinions. word got out about the ending scene, but the movie had already passed judgement with a decent score and could not be flagged. then the reviews came pooring in about the scene where a certain animator on Newgrounds was animated having sex. that animator's fans could not score the movie justly, instead there were over 100 reviews almost all were 0/10 saying things like how they were going to track me down and kill me.

those fans did all the could blammed, reviewed 0, but they could not use their precious whistles to get the movie flagged because it had already passed judgment. this brings us to today where I find my movie in the graveyard and an e-mail saying my movie was deleted because it had a bad score. no, my movie passed judgement and was deleted because there were so many angry reviewers who could not use that whistle and instead must have flooded tom's/wade's e-mail with angry letters. there are movies in the portal with 0.01/5.00 and still remain.

100's of movies a day get submitted poking fun at celebrities, even schoolmates & friends where these people are portrayed as gay and/or stupid but are judged based on the quality & entertainment. my movie had the same content but was judged unfairly. had I shown michael jackson having sex with a child it would have been ok, but because it was someone who has a lot of fans on NG it was removed. if the movie was resubmitted with a black censorship bar over any offensive material it would be whistled because it's not about the "offensive" sexual representation (me and my co-author drew everything in Flash anyway, there was no photo-realistic nudity).

I am now asking that all movies with similar content be removed from Newgrounds or that mine be put back in the portal. and I would also like to see the whistle option "offensive" removed due to its vague description.

for those of you too lazy to read through my entire long post, here is a summary:

my movie was deleted because it was "offensive" yet many "offensive" movies, much more extreme than mine, remain. this makes offensive material objectionable and should not be a reason for a blown whistle, especially not to a website originally built on offensive movies and plastered with hentai ads.
if action is not taken now newgrounds will be owned by disney and the only thing left to watch will be little mermaid cartoons. or maybe that will be too offensive for audiences as well...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/175991

Legendary Frogs new movie!??
he just revealed his new secret! omg watch!

what do you think about that?
I'm not really surprised though.

discus.

I heard he killed himself because of that parody sicksexfiend made! this cant be happening!