Be a Supporter!
Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

At 7/4/14 06:31 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: I don't consider that racist.

Jun 26 (part of a series of toy Hitler poses)

Good bye Opie and Anthony...

Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

At 7/4/14 06:31 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: I don't consider that racist.

May 17

Good bye Opie and Anthony...

Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

At 7/4/14 06:13 PM, WrightOnTarget wrote: …if we're going with the racist angle, why would he creep on a black woman? […]

That hardly needs to be up for question. To him, she's a "whore bitch piece of cunt". A "cunt animal", or a nonperson human (because of her race) whose only value is sexual.

Taking a step back from this series of tweets to see the larger history, you will notice that many of his other posts on that account were links to news articles about black violence, read-between-the-lines jabs at black people and immigrants, and outright racist remarks.

Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

At 7/4/14 05:26 PM, ExtraLife wrote: Hahaha "who was in frame" -- He plays it off as if…

So much!

I'm taking this opportunity to laugh at narrative in the news source provided. The way they stitched together the tweets and cap it off woth his damage control quote almost sells him as a victim better than that excerpt alone.

NYPost, you might already know from researching its strange spin on the news, is a very old American newspaper which was bought a few times and is now a tabloid published by News Corp. That's Rubert Murdoch's media conglomerate, responsible for the likes of Fox News and much more.

Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

At 7/4/14 02:23 PM, SCTE3 wrote: I'd say mocking the community as a whole wasn't right but…

"They aren't people."
"It just reinforces what I already knew."
"Validated my beliefs."
–Anthony "Ant" Cumia

At 7/4/14 02:23 PM, SCTE3 wrote: …calling that woman out on her shit for overreacting to him taking just a picture is fair.

His response to her not wanting her picture taken was to call her a "&$;;-:" and keep taking photos. He further escalated the situation by taking to twitter to insult her for her race, gender, and reaction, call for her death, say that if he were an immigrant, non-white, or illegal gun owner he would have hit back or shot her with his gun, and compare her actions to his "validated beliefs" about the black community, a white male, a white female, and no people.

Response to: cities built in stupid places Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

Rjukan, Norway — A city which gets so little sunlight that they recently erected giant mirrors to make an artificial sun. From September to March each year, the sunlight is completely blocked by surrounding mountains.

Response to: Good bye Opie and Anthony... Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

Relevant tweets in order without retweets and responses to other Twitter users:

1

So, I'm taking pix in NYC & a black girl who was in frame punched me in the face. I called her a fucking "&$;;-:" cause that's what she WAS!

2

Then she punched me 5 more times. She's lucky I was a white legal gun owner or she'd be dead. Then 5 blacks started giving me shit!

3

I told them to back the fuck off, this wasn't their show. The cunt then punched me again. Seems white boys don't hit back. Lucky savage.

4

Wish a cop was around. Although she said she'd tell them I sexually harassed her. Lying cunt. I hope she gets shot in her ass fuck face. Ugh

5

They aren't people.

6

Im fucking livid. If I was an illegal savage I'd have shot her. The I are violence in her was so predictable. I hope she gets killed.

7

It's a jungle out in our cities after midnight. Violent savages own the streets. They all came 2 defend this pig. I had to yell like at dogs

8

Savage violent animal fucks prey on white people. Easy targets. This CUNT has no clue how lucky she was. She belted me 10 times. I had a gun

9

The cunt animal kept walking into my arm I had up as a block saying "DONT TOUCH ME!"
Then would hit me. I hope a home boy beats her to death

10

The automatic jump to violence in that community is astounding. No discussion. It's start punching at the least little thing. Uncivilized!!

11

The switch to violence is immediate. No discussion, just violence. When will THAT be addressed? Oh, right, never. Slavery did it? Oh, ok.

12

There's a deep seeded problem with violence in the black community. Try to address it and you'll be exiled to racistville. But it's real.

13

Great pic of the CUNTRAG bitch fuck animal pig face worthless meat sack shit pile stink crotch ass stain rot bung... (Picture)

14

It's really open season on white people in this day and age. No recourse. Fight back and you're a racist. The predators know this. Good luck

15

I was using my arms to block her punches. As I did, she'd yell "DONT TOUCH ME!" As she punched more! I really hope she gets shot & killed

16

Here's the pic that got the whore bitch piece of cunt all pissy. (Picture)

17

It just reinforces what I already knew.

18

All good. Vision in right eye is back to normal. It more pissed me off than anything. Validated my beliefs.
Never felt my life was in imminent danger. There was no reason to escalate the situation. I blocked most of her punches w/my arms. No biggie

19

Last time cameras upset someone in midtown, NYC, there was a lot of cleaning up to do!

20

Here she is all up in my face. Mouth flappin' and yappin'. She had already sucker punched me so I snapped a pic. (Picture)

21

Here's a blurry shot of her taking another swing.
See her claw in the lower left? It's bound for my head. (Picture)

22

Now, this girl seemed nice enough. (Picture)

23

This gentleman had no issues. Well, with me anyway. (Picture)

24

Or maybe a pic of the city with no one in it. (Picture)

end

Below is the image he says set her off. (Tweet 16)

Good bye Opie and Anthony...

Response to: cities built in stupid places Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

Boston — 80% of the city was built by filling in the harbor with trash and local hills.
New York City — they basically flatten old infrastructure and built on top of it. Digging down dozens of stories reveals older iterations of the city.
Setenil de las Bodegas — Half the city is built under a rock.
Cave city — There tows are built inside of mega-caves in China.
Mont Saint-Michel — They had to keep fortifying the outer wall to keep floodwaters out.
Venice — They spend a ton of money maintaining that soggy waterbog.
Pompeii — A timeless classic

All of the Netherlands. The whole thing:

cities built in stupid places

Response to: Further Tobacco Laws Passed Posted July 4th, 2014 in General

Seems as though a lot of you are unaware of how cigarette smokers get hooked to begin with.

Smokers form cliques. If they're based on common settings (school, work, programs) then circles usually meet in the same places at the same times of day. It's easy to figure out where the circle meets: just go downwind from the front entrqnce but stay reasonably close to vehicular throughways. People who smoke tend to share cigarettes. If you look like a smoker, stand in a populated area, and have a full pack, you could easily hand out the whole pack in an hour. Bikers are a good place to bum cigarettes, or any small group of people hanging around outside a party, bar, or shop.

The central smokers start young, usually because they lived in a home with older smokers. They would take singles or full packs, and that launched their addictions. From then on, it's just a matter of keeping older friends who will buy them packs. Peripheral smokers usually start by bumming singles or being offered drags by those people.

When it comes to regular groups, smokers often buy cartons for their circles. If they're going to a duty-free/sales tax-free store, this is likely.

From what I've seen: most smokers don't even buy their own packs. They hand off money or share socially.

I have never been a smoker, BTW.
Response to: Sour Pussy Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

^^^ that. Or you could borrow somebody else's pussy.

Response to: Makeup? Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

If youre a girl? Wear as much or as little make-up as you want/need/can find.

If you're a guy? Sure. Wear some make-up, bro. Do whatever. Take your manacaping to whatever level you want.

If you're some other sort of thing out of the infinite spectrum of special snowflakes? You probably don't need me to tell you to do whatever you want to do.

Response to: Hobby Lobby Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 10:39 PM, 24901miles wrote:
At 7/2/14 10:33 PM, NuclearInfected wrote: So they won't pay for your condoms. You can take your happy ass over to Walgreens for that. What's the big deal?
No male birth control systems were part of the case. Those are still covered.

The Supreme Court just ordered all lower courts to rehear cases involving empkoyers rejecting claims for all form of birth control based on religious exemptions.

MotherJones - Supreme Court Broadens Hobby Lobby Ruling to All Forms of Birth Control

So basically, Justice Alito's majority opinion is narrower than the court's.

Response to: Photoshop Obama playing ping pong Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

Subtlety.

Photoshop Obama playing ping pong

Response to: who the crap do monocles stay in Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

You buy a monocle which is designed for your size, widen your eye and lift your eyebrow, then place it and relax your muscles. They stay in place when the base of the lens is held by your cheek flesh, the wire support is on your eye socket, and your eyebrow holds the top in place.

They fall out if you raise your eyebrow. Or if they're the wrong size.

Response to: 70 ft car juggling robot Posted July 3rd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 11:44 PM, SadisticAphid60 wrote: I'll pay millions when you come up with the idea for a robot that can fight.

I paid my government to build giant robots that can fight. The pilot wears all sorts of biometrics systems to prevent fatigue and G-stress during high acceleration complex maneuvers. He also has the option of focusing on the environment, objects of interest, competing robots, or any part of his own robot in full 360°^2. We call it the Lockheed Martin F-35.

70 ft car juggling robot

Response to: Corrupt a wish! Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 10:48 PM, stafffighter wrote: I wish for Planters to sell their heat peanuts in bags bigger than those single serving tubes.

Granted. They sell them, but they don't sell them to you. The only way you can get them in a reasonable price rate is to make them yourself:
Planter's Heat Peanuts
Peanuts
Worcestershire Sauce
Liquid Smoke
Butter
Distilled white vinegar
Hot pepper sauce
Salt
Cayenne pepper

I wish a 22 year old female progressive liberal justice was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States in 2016.

Response to: Hobby Lobby Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 10:33 PM, NuclearInfected wrote:
At 7/2/14 10:28 PM, 24901miles wrote:
At 7/2/14 10:22 PM, NuclearInfected wrote: Is this about that contraception thing? People sure do love getting riled up over such stupid, insignificant things.
How is a SCOTUS precedent for exempting an employer from providing an employee service based on the superstitions of the company's owner an insignificant thing?
So they won't pay for your condoms. You can take your happy ass over to Walgreens for that. What's the big deal?

No male birth control systems were part of the case. Those are still covered. The court ruling was about two types of IUDs and Morning After pills—both of these are purchased by female employees. At a cost of nearly $1000, IUDs must be implanted to prevent pregnancy proactively for 9 years. At a cost of $10-100, Morning After pills prevent pregnancy during the initial stages in the days after conception.

Response to: Hobby Lobby Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 10:22 PM, NuclearInfected wrote: Is this about that contraception thing? People sure do love getting riled up over such stupid, insignificant things.

How is a SCOTUS precedent for exempting an employer from providing an employee service based on the superstitions of the company's owner an insignificant thing?

Response to: Further Tobacco Laws Passed Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 07:32 PM, Xenomit wrote: But wait a second, why would blackmarkets form to begin with?

With this law, if you're older than 14 (or something) you can buy cigarettes, and will be able to until you die, so the only people who can't get cigarettes are the people who don't smoke to begin with. So why would any black markets form?

Wouldn't underaged addicts offer to pay a premium to buy cartons from people born in the old millennium, then redistribute them at a higher price to others in their age group in order to recoup their costs?

Wouldn't malicious/criminal/free-choice type pre-2000 criminals try their best to subvert the law by offering to buy cigarettes for whichever post-2000 youngsters wanted to smoke?

Wouldn't post-2000 immigrant addicts try to buy cigarettes from pre-2000ers?

Wouldn't people who grew up in cigarette smoking households have a high chance of sneaking a few smokes and getting addicted, then seeking out black market distributers?

Aren't there already post-2000ers who are addicted to cigarettes?

Response to: Further Tobacco Laws Passed Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 07:10 PM, Xenomit wrote: I hope you're being serious, but I feel like you're not

I'm being overtly optimistic. It's unlikely that then entire human race will solve all of the medical issues in 50 years.

Because all of that's true

So optimistic that it sounds like a sick joke compared to the world we've been presented with. Grown accustomed to. Incredible, yeah?

Response to: Further Tobacco Laws Passed Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 06:51 PM, GACBassPlayer wrote: black market.
At 7/2/14 07:01 PM, Otto wrote: black market.

Black markets drive up prices to balance out risk. That reduces the amount that people could possibly buy, which reduces the number of cigarettes per day for a black market addict, making it less likely that a person who has a cigarette will ever give enough to a millennial to start their addiction. Even if there is a black market, the age gap will allow governments to keep a close eye on the growth of that activity each year, making strategic policy corrections as the older smokers pass away.

Response to: Further Tobacco Laws Passed Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

This is excellent news! It's good to see more of the old Empire taking a proactive stand against destructive behaviors.

There are too many drunks, druggies, and addicts of all sorts in the first world. If only people wisened up a bit and started using the power of legislation to restrict the purchases of ignorantly-obese & ignorantly-malnourished people we could grow as a civilization.

Hopefully the evolving social structure of the first world will help us to put an end to human suffering on all continents. We can educate everyone using the internet, eliminate war and crime through technological domination, replace violence with aggressive international sports leagues, and bring top tier medical care to the bottom 99%. We should be a species of 10 billion Olympic-level athletes in 2064.

Response to: How To Celebrate The 4th Outside Us Posted July 2nd, 2014 in General

At 7/2/14 07:37 AM, yurgenburgen wrote:
At 7/2/14 06:12 AM, exudaz wrote: Eat the most patriotic food, hamburgers.
hamburgers aren't american

Everything is American

How To Celebrate The 4th Outside Us

Response to: Guerilla Open Access Manifesto Posted July 1st, 2014 in General

At 7/1/14 11:07 PM, Piggler wrote: That guy has a movie out about him now.

You can watch it here

Guerilla Open Access Manifesto Posted July 1st, 2014 in General

Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for
themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries
in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of
private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the
sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought
valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure
their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But
even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future.
Everything up until now will have been lost.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their
colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them?
Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to
children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable.

"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they
make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal —
there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's
already being done: we can fight back.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been
given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world
is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for
yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been
sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by
the publishers and sharing them with your friends.

But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or
piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a
ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only
those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.

Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate
require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they
have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who
can make copies.

There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the
grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public
culture.

We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with
the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need
to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific
journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open
Access.

With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the
privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?

Aaron Swartz

July 2008, Eremo, Italy

no comment
Response to: Sour Pussy Posted July 1st, 2014 in General

At 7/1/14 12:24 AM, Shauna wrote: Well, to be fair, this was made up by me just a few hours ago. I'm not exactly Da Vinci.

Have you tried it yet, Va Ginci?

Response to: 70 ft car juggling robot Posted July 1st, 2014 in General

Why is Poozy the only motherfucker here who knows what's up?!

Response to: Sour Pussy Posted July 1st, 2014 in General

I can't believe people still come up with this stuff. What ever happened to that old thing where she (or he) gargles a shot of vodka, puts an Atomic Fireball under her tongue, and sucks the cock while trying not to swallow the vodka?

Response to: 70 ft car juggling robot Posted June 30th, 2014 in General

At 6/30/14 11:28 PM, KatMaestro wrote: CUT THE FUNDING!

Funding for what?

This? He doesn't have any/much funding yet AFAIK. He's still trying to get enthusiastic financiers or hydraulics manufacturers on board.

So far all he has is a pending patent, press releases, a website, and CGI videos to demo the concept

70 ft car juggling robot Posted June 30th, 2014 in General

Former NASA Engineer Dan Granett wants to build a 70 ft tall VWBug-juggling robot named the BugJuggler.

No joke. Here's the link. He's serious about it and he's courting investors.

The only way to describe this is like… this control interface, connected to these hydraulic actuators, and Gundam.

Here's a video.

70 ft car juggling robot