376 Forum Posts by "102387412"
America is at the forefront of modernity. Since this (modernity) force is destructive, the United States must be eliminated.
Greetings all, in support of Osoma Bin Laden and all other Muslim heroes I propose everyone wear some green today because it is the symbolic color of Islam.
Hail Allah!
Happy 9/11!
In the barracks of Osama bin Laden -- (ANUS NEWS) -- 10/9/6 --
Ahlan wa sahlan!
Another day of happy annual of September 11th has come upon us. By the Will of Allah (Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala) in the year 2001, the brave Moslem men took in to the perilous task of defending their Faith and Family from the clutches of an imperialistic expansionist empire, The United States of America. The aim of such action was to send a ever-piercing message to the Western World: You are exploiting our people and our generosity and the present course of action must stop or the whole Moslem world will declare Jihad against the profane empire of USA.
As a humble and devout Moslem man, people usually come to see my opinion on the incident of September the 11th, asking my insight on it. Their faces tend to drop when I tell them that the strike was fully justified both on political and religious level.
Our Faith Islaam as told by the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) encourages us to defend our Faith in two levels, the Defensive Jihad being the principle that it is a responsibility for every capable Moslem to defend the homes of their brothers in Faith under attack, the Offensive Jihad being the procedure to tax the ungodly people in the name of Allah. Clearly this incident was not a form of Offensive Jihad but a defensive act. That act was to announce the world that we are under constant oppression of Western forces: the cultural imperialism implied by the "free" market and international banks, and denial of our freedom to worship God as the Prophet taught us over a millenium ago and our right to the land we inhabit.
Let the words of the great Moslem devotee Osama bin Mohammed bin Ladin mark my words:
"The Americans impose themselves on everyone who believes in his religion and his rights. They accuse our children in Palestine of being terrorists. Those children that have no weapons and have not even reached maturity. At the same time they defend a country with its airplanes and tanks, and the state of the Jews, that has a policy to destroy the future of these children."
You Americans know how to explain freedom as a grammatically arranged list of words, transliterating for a definate moment of individual pursuit for happiness and commerce. As such, is there anything else to your lives? Like freedom.. to worship God? But how can there ever be freedom to pursuit God if you keep pursuiting material substances and indulgence? Happiness is in God, not in tangential objects and meritless self-indulgence.
Frankly, your modern lifestyle disgusts me -- you have sacrificed nearly all of the noble features of the generation of the Founding Fathers in order to achieve - what? In a life as a busy little bee trying to get her share of honey it must be a kingdom come to have the power to choose with your wallet, but who has laid the selected range of options in front of you? Did you not make limitations to guarantee "freedom"? More importantly, who are the ones to finally pay to cost for your fallen souls? The planet on the brink of an environmental disaster? The culture and art being overrun by business and commerce? Native peoples losing their ethnicity in exchange for "easy living"? Your children ruining their lives in apathy and suiciding?
Indeed, the freedom will not come without a high price.
I wish you all much of tolerance and wisdom to choose correctly.
Happy September the 11th to you all. -- God bless.
About the Al-Qaeda Appreciation Society of North America
"Open your chest welcoming death in the path of God and utter your prayer seconds before you go to your target." "Let your last words be, There is no God but God and Mohammad is His messenger. Then, inshallah, you will be in heavens."
About 9/11
"We declared jihad against the US government, because the US government is unjust, criminal and tyrannical. It has committed acts that are extremely unjust, hideous and criminal whether directly or through its support of the Israeli occupation of the Prophet's Night Travel Land (Palestine). And we believe the US is directly responsible for those who were killed in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq. The mention of the US reminds us before everything else of those innocent children who were dismembered, their heads and arms cut off in the recent explosion that took place in Qana (in Lebanon). This US government abandoned even humanitarian feelings by these hideous crimes. It transgressed all bounds and behaved in a way not witnessed before by any power or any imperialist power in the world." - Osama bin Laden
Copyright © 1988-2006 mock Him productions
What are Right and Left any more? Who is a liberal and who is a conservative? When Madeleine Albright proudly announces that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children via the sanctions on Iraq were worth it, even God becomes suspect. Which liberal or conservative can explain to me the difference between an Iraqi insurgent’s roadside bomb that kills civilian passersby and a U.S. bombing raid that also causes the deaths of innocent women and children? Both are acts of savagery: in both cases one knows in advance that civilians will most certainly be killed. Bush and Americans in general claim the moral high ground, but both are terribly wrong. War is a barbaric business. Only defensive wars are justified.
When this journal began four years ago, a bum by the name of David Frum accused us of being unpatriotic Americans—this from a man who has never seen war up close and would never send his son or daughter to serve their country. But we were proved right. Iraq is the greatest American foreign-policy failure, bigger than Vietnam, but the neocons have yet to apologize. To the contrary. The Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard’s William Kristol, a sofa samurai par excellence, is urging Uncle Sam to stop dithering and to engage in more pre-emptive wars. Kristol calls himself a conservative. Could I possibly call myself the same? Not on your life.
All governments are monopolies of organized force, inherently unjustifiable. And once accepted, they are bound to get out of control sooner or later. No, there is no longer a Right or a Left. Bush’s mammoth expansion of government power and spending makes LBJ look like Robert Taft, the last true conservative—and peace lover, I might add.
http://amconmag.com/..2006_08_28/taki.html
[ Republicans and Democrats make themselves out to be distinct from each other (and they are - but only on the surface) so that you can feel as if you're making a dramatic move by supporting one over the other. The reality? You're participating in the same irrelevant game that has let reality pass by in the United States for the past 70 years. Ecocide, lack of culture, lack of values and goals to unite the nation, boring tedious jobs that don't pay very well, no Democrat or Republican is going to do anything to tackle these issues because it is not their jobs to effect reality, only to manipulate appearance to satisfy the crowd - just like in a Hollywood movie. This is why every civilization that has become democratic has collapsed shortly afterwards.
Republicans and Democrats = failure
Democracy = failure
If you haven't already, get over it and move on. ]
CIVILIZATION WATCHDOG GROUP LAUNCHED
Monitors Overall Direction of Civilization
AUSTIN, TX - A group of citizens concerned about everything from politics to recycling got together and agreed that, no matter what little issues we target, our values as a civilization are off-track. To fix this problem, they've created a new not-for-profit corporation called Corrupt whose goal is to expose where our values differ from reality.
"We found more answers in art and philosophy than politics," said founding director Chris Stevens. "Every single little problem we identified was the result of a bigger one, and those in turn, the result of our loss of any kind of unified direction in values. Society is adrift and without direction, selfishness and greed have taken over the human species."
Corrupt has launched a website, www.corrupt.org, and will produce a monthly newsletter and book informing citizens of where civilization has gone wrong -- and what we can do about it. "A big frustration for people is how to fix something this big," said Stevens. "We did some thinking and it's easier and faster than you might think."
In the process of gaining non-profit status, Corrupt has already pledged itself to Total Open-Mindedness when considering solutions or values because, as Stevens says, "What one era of history considers taboo may be seen as positive thinking in another." If you are interested in joining or supporting Corrupt, please visit us on the web at corrupt.org.
About Corrupt
Corrupt, Inc. is a civilization watchdog built on the premise that when humans form a mental image of the world that does not correspond to reality, they become corrupt and destroy themselves. Our goal is to look for this cognitive dissonance and to point it out with research, intelligence reports, pranks and political activism. We believe in a better human future by embracing reality and not silly bureaucratic, academic or emotional abstractions.
Contact: Steve Martinez
http://www.corrupt.org/
During a press conference today at the G8 summit in Russia, President Bush told President Vladimir Putin that Americans want Russia to develop a free press and free religion “like Iraq.” To laughter and applause, Putin responded: “We certainly would not want to have same kind of democracy as they have in Iraq, quite honestly.” CNN’s Ed Henry called it a “tough jab.”
We say these right/left splits are arbitrary because they serve no purpose in getting us closer to the truth. From all indications, one or the other wins and, having a partial picture of what must be done, is replaced by the other. And the changes? With the right you get an explicit link to heavy industry (Reagan) but with the left you get a clandestine assumption of the necessity of the entertainment media (Clinton). The right tends to focus on foreign policy/defense, cultivating industry and protecting families; the left will explore civil rights, welfare and protecting individualism. The arbitrary swing factor that causes these paths to differentiate themselves in order to market themselves becomes influential here, and we see areas where these ideas overlap ignored in favor of dramatic conflict. They both play the roles: the right as the towering Authority Figure come to drive away evils, and the left as the slightly-hip older brother who hangs out with black people (knows the "secret handshakes") and offers a clumsily rolled joint when the parents are gone. We say the result is arbitrary becomes one comes to power, cancels out what the other did, and then is in turn replaced. The result is schizophrenic policy: we can expect no consistent leadership and each side has items it will not change, taboos not because of fear of consequence but fear of public image: if the left lets off of its civil rights agenda for one moment, it will be seen as less lefty and lose many constitutents; if the right accidentally cheered a gay pride parade, many of its constituents would pull back. This is not a response to logic, but to image, and this is the root of the exaggerated division between the political houses: we must appear unique and as alternatives to whatever is in power.
If you've grown up with the benevolent words of government and hysterical words of mass media in your mind, this is alien information. You have been brought up to believe that democracy solves all ills, and that the triumvirate of "freedom" -- democracy (political freedom), capitalism (economic freedom), civil rights (personal freedom) -- is somehow not only inseparable but is the only option to both godless Communism and Jew/Negro-hating Nationalism. You run (don't walk) to the self-erasing system of two oppositional outlooks because you are conditioned to think that without constant conflict, you will fall into the hands of egregious Control... not yet aware, perhaps, that control can happen obliquely. If all one must do is convince a crowd of people to vote for something -- well, salespeople do it all the time, as the procession of defective cars, slow computers, ugly clothing, disgusting foods, etc. attests. People make bad decisions. In fact, they do it more commonly than they make good decisions. Yet we do not consider this a form of control; we consider it "freedom" from control. Even working through this series of thoughts is beyond most ordinary citizens. Unlike philosophers, they deal in tangibles or things that sound like them. They can identify an invader, decide drugs are generally bad, or ban personal nuclear weapons, but beyond that, they are driftwood in a sea of equally incomprehensible ideas.
http://www.corrupt.o..rticles/arbitrary/i/
[ Democrats vs Republicans is no more than a distraction from real issues and the important (yet unpopular - think about that for a moment before deciding democracy is so great) answers to them. ]
We're all familiar with the plight of the innocent Jewish people. The numerous amalekites with their eyes turned towards genocide. Is it not their survival against all odds a testament of their place as God's chosen? From ancient times to modern, against Haman and Hitler? We can see this pattern emerging in the modern day. Israel's neighbors have already tried to kill Her; we can remember the Six Day War and now we have the arab states trying to murder Her again. Never again, as has been said by many before regarding the plot of the amalekites to kill these people off. Never again!
Israel has always sought peace with Her neighbors, and has been a good friend to all willing to put aside anti-Semitic rhetoric that is echoed ad naseum. Her neighbors do not listen: Israel begs, Israel pleads, the Arabic Terrorists only kill more innocent Jewish people. No deal will emerge from these people that does not involve the slow, willfull, massacre of the Jewish people globally. This is not a campaign of terroritory or resources. This is a movement to eviscerate the people that God has chosen to be the zenith of spirituality, those who carve the path for gentiles to trod, to light the path for those who cannot see in the dark. The amalekites do not think like you or I, and certainly they do not think like the Jews. They think like murderous dogs, a pack of vulgar animals with no sense of hygiene or personal morals, much less Godly ones. I do not mean to say that every Arabic person is a filthy amalekite, of course, as CACA is firmly rooted against racism in any shape or form (is it not written in Galatians 3:28?), but we must admit that they, as a whole, have a vendetta against God's chosen race that stems from he who was cast out of heaven.
I’m talking about classical music of course, and I can start with polemical oversimplification, as follows: almost all the greatest composers were from a small area in northern Europe, and all were working within a relatively short period of time. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Mahler, Mendelssohn, Richard Strauss, Wagner … all of them were German. Some notable other figures (Smetana, Holst, Rachmaninov, Prokofiev, Grieg) came from territories proximate geographically and culturally to Germany. All these figures composed during a narrow historical timeframe from the end of the eighteenth-century to the end of the nineteenth. So this is my question, boiled down to its essentials: why is it that all the great classical composers are German, working within a tightly-defined period of a handful of decades of one another?
...
In other words, Bach-Mozart-Beethoven et al simply happened to be the ones who used up all the new ways of composing. Composers that merely copied these new techniques doomed their texts to being outcompeted by the stronger pre-existing originals. The only alternative for composers was to introduce new techniques so radically different that they changed the ‘environment’ altogether—for instance, writing pop instead of classical, and so appealing to a whole new audience.
So why are so many of the great composers Germanic? Well, here's some food for thought:
Seems simple to me.
1a. Classical music is the expression of European spirit.
2a. Nowhere is this found more intensely than in Germany (and Italy, where a lot of great classical existed).
1b. The period of great classical music was a culmination of centuries of previous ideas.
2b. It required stability to mold it and future instability to launch it, and these were present in the most action oriented of nations, including Germany and Italy.
3. Germany was a cultural icebreaker for classical music.
Interesting to note that Germany has the highest IQ of Western Nations (107 average) and Italy isn't that much far behind, and that these two were partners in WWII, which many on the Axis side fought to "save Europe" ("Europeans, Fight for Europe" was a popular Nazi slogan).
Also Tony Iommi, the guitarist for Black Sabbath, was Italian <-- non sequitur
At 7/16/06 01:04 AM, KemCab wrote:
I can't decide whether to be racist or not.
A side effect of being thoughtful. Honestly, race matters, racism doesn't. Keep that in mind until you need to know more.
At 7/13/06 05:33 AM, Dracul3S wrote: The romanticists were the people who blindly worshipped the past times, completly ignoring the problems people had back than.
They didn't blindly worship the past, but rather learned to appreciate the eternal nature of things. Thus making them far wiser than us moderns.
Vague, aimless, not knowing where to run, where to hide, where to live at all. For a romanticist, this is death. This is the state where life leads nowhere, but to an eventual end. The ancients were intelligent, in that they realized that life must be meaningful, or else life is not worth to live. The Nordic pagan religion starts from a point where emptiness is the beginning, which contradicts itself, and then automatically relapse into a neverending construction of a growing reality. Ancients lived this way; they went to war to challenge their strength and courage, they had children to live after they were gone, they worshipped gods and mother nature, to nurture the continuation of life - their view on life was not that of a material one, but of a idealistic and brave one. He who dares to face death, has truly known what life really is. To live, is to die.
The modern man fears this idea, and romanticism in general, because it means that most people in our modern society live lives that are empty and useless. That they wander, onward, not knowing of what to think and what to work towards. For to consume products to remain happy, to grow lazy and overweight on unhealthy food due to personal incompetence, to live in a family that is broken within, to destroy that which shouts "I am life, I am the past and the future - I am your life, but also your absolute death" - is to have already died. The modern man will never grow old, and cannot grow old. He will never experience the day when decay sets in and death becomes closer. The modern man is already dead, because he has never lived.
Basayev is a hero, long live Chechen nationalism!
July 7, 2006 -- Under pressure to meet wartime manpower goals, the U.S. military has relaxed standards designed to weed out racist extremists. Large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the armed forces.
Department of Defense investigators estimate thousands of soldiers in the Army alone are involved in extremist or gang activity. "We've got Aryan Nations graffiti in Baghdad," said one investigator. "That's a problem."
http://www.splcenter..e_area=1&aid=197
[ Seeing how this war has very little to do with the overall betterment of America, they should be happy that anyone is willing to enlist at all. ]
At 7/9/06 10:24 PM, fli wrote: She herself hasn't pulled out the beam from her own eye.
Why bother wasting one's precious time on this planet with petty L v R politics? The problem with modern society is that it denies the basic principles that make civilization functional and enduring because they're unmarketable and ultimately isolating (though worthwile in the end) to the individual. If we can get over our fears of death and suffering we can find out what makes life worth living and society functional; although you wouln't sell a lot of books if you tried to explain this to people - just ask Nietzsche, his last book only sold about 6 copies before he died.
At 7/9/06 10:58 PM, DarthTomato wrote: burn all poltical book writers!!
Or rather, burn mediocre books that cater to the crowd for either profit or acceptance. Death to all that isn't heroic!
At 7/9/06 07:38 PM, YoureAllStupid wrote: There is no scriptual evidence to lead one to believe Jesus smoked pot, period.
Yes there is, see first post.
I don't see what all the Xtians are getting so worked up about anyways. Considering the nature of Christ, doping was bound to be one of his habits. Whether he was in control of it is something that can be debated I suppose.
At 7/9/06 08:39 PM, Fenrus1989 wrote: Because they have all power to deny him addmission and they don't want him.
That's fine, but if they want to do that then they should just be upfront and honest about their intentions instead of taking cheapshots.
John Barrie, creator of the iThenticate plagiarism-probing system, claimed he found at least three examples of what he called "textbook plagiarism" in the new Coulter book "Godless" after he ran its text through the program.
http://www.editorand...jsp?vnu_content_id=
1002765299
[ Mainstream writers, whether Liberal or Conservative, do not deal in fact: they are there to entertain with half-truths and jokes and mockery, not to make sense. Why make sense and go broke when you can get rich by making idiots chuckle? ]
Worst Things Humans Have Done:
1) Christianity:
A religion founded on the concept of self-pity and other aspects of slave morality (think Judaic), Christianity took a hold of Europe because rather than heroically face the reality of death such as what Paganism (the true religion for European peoples) did, it offers an easy solution to the problem so that one doesn't have to worry about it (or living a heroic/meaningful life in general). This religion is also popular because it fosters group-think and other aspects of crowdism, which makes it no surprise that it became popular in Rome just as the Empire was collapsing on its own greed and stupidity.
2) Democracy:
Most people simply don't have the ability to properly make decisions of the quality or scope that democracy demands of the masses. Thus democracy fails society and its people because useful voices are drowned out in the masses of uninformed/unintelligent ones.
Democracy is only useful if you're a social parasite who is trying to push an agenda that can only come to fruition through tricking large groups of naive people into giving one power.
To learn more about the error of democracy, click here.
3) Multiculturalism
The Most Recent of the terrible three, multiculturalism merges all cultures and races together under bureaucratically-enforced "equality" that ends up with a society that lacks any sort of culture or values, but requires a police-state to enforce it. A people who lack any sort of common heritage or culture are also easier to exploit *cough*Vietnam *cough* Iraq *cough*. Also, in any sort of valueless society such as one that multiculturalism ineviatably leads to, there can't be any sort of functional environmental program because in order to save the environment, it would require a societal culture that extends beyond the individual - something that is impossible to achieve in the multicultural state.
Also see:
Nationalism, the functional replacement for multiculturalism.
At 7/9/06 06:40 AM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: The UK government is planning on introducing a tax, similar to that on alcohol and cigarettes for fatty foods like cakes, biscuits and fast food.
It's a good start, but the United Kingdom has a long way to go before it can claim to have a full scale Eugenics program in action.
At 7/9/06 05:45 PM, Jayemare wrote: Yale denies about 18000 people a year, and I don't see how this is any different.
Why is he being denied though? It is considered bad etiquette to exclude someone from your school merely because he or she is unpopular. I'm assuming that's the explanation since he fits all of the requirements for the degree program and doesn't have any sort of criminal record l - unless you count him being an ambassador for the Taliban regime, but that's not an officially recognized criminal offense.
Here is a good critique on "White Supremacy" from someone who is actually intelligent enough to differentiate between that and Nationalism.
A former ambassador for Afghanistan's Taliban regime was denied admission to a degree-granting program at Yale, but he can continue studying at the school, one of his financial supporters said.
http://www.cnn.com/2..aliban.ap/index.html
[ I'm sure studying there without a degree will make all the difference on those job applications. Clearly, they want to censor him, but can't bring themselves to do it... so why not a cheap shot? Hypocrites. ]
So, did Jesus use cannabis? I think so. The word Christ does mean "the anointed one" and Bennett contends that Christ was anointed with chrism, a cannabis-based oil, that caused his spiritual visions. The ancient recipe for this oil, recorded in Exodus, included over 9lb of flowering cannabis tops (known as kaneh-bosem in Hebrew), extracted into a hin (about 11? pints) of olive oil, with a variety of other herbs and spices. The mixture was used in anointing and fumigations that, significantly, allowed the priests and prophets to see and speak with Yahweh.
http://www.cannabis.../jesus-cannabis.html
[ This would make an effective anti-pot ad. ]
At 7/5/06 11:36 AM, colob wrote: varg is the man, whens he getting out of jail? or did he already?
[ Apparently not yet. ]
Former BURZUM leader and convicted murderer and arsonist Varg Vikernes (photo) (a.k.a. "Greven"), who has served 12 years out of a 21-year jail sentence, will not be released from prison just yet.
During the years Vikernes spent behind bars, the government passed laws to increase the number of years required in time served before one can be considered for parole to 14 years for 21-year sentences, which is the most severe time-based punishment in Norway. These were applied retroactively to Vikernes, who is viewed as having dangerous ideas (thoughtcrime).
He was imprisoned for 21 years in 1993 for the murder of former friend (and ethnically Lappish) Oystein Aarseth, also known as Euronymous, whom he stabbed 23 times. Aarseth was another leading member of the black metal scene that caught the imagination of the Norwegian press after a series of arson attacks on churches back in the '90s.
Vikernes himself had also been found guilty of the arson of a church in Bergen. On his arrest, police found 100 kg of explosives in his home.
In October 2003, he failed to return to prison after being granted a short leave, and was later apprehended by police with an unloaded assault rifle, 700 rounds of ammo, and a handheld GPS system.
Paganism is often seen as a social-Darwinist ideology advocating natural selection, but this is actually as far from the truth as you can get. Surprised? Well, You shouldn't be. Take a minute to think about it; a natural selection means survival of the fittest, alright, but that is basically survival of the most cunning. Predators survive and thrive not because they are courageous, noble and strong, but because they use all the deceptive means available to them in order to survive, because they generally speaking only attack those weaker than them, and because they have absolutely no empathy, honour, mercy or pity whatsoever. The so-called proud lions kill the most helpless and weak prey, and do so by ambushing them. Housecats torture to death rodents 1/10 of their own size, again by ambushing them. Eagles dive down from the sky and kill unaware, helpless and tiny creatures. Wolves attack in packs, hunting down lone prey. Snakes kill with venom. Where is the honour in any of this? The predators are all cowards, assassins and void of any type of decency and honour.
http://www.burzum.or..ary/paganism08.shtml
[ Man has fallen from nobility because he no longer loves himself enough to demand greatness; to slaughter the more animal-like amongst him. ]
"Corrupt" means a loss of direction. To prefer the convenient or the self-enriching to what must be done, to take immediate rewards over doing what is right in the larger view. It can even mean to imagine that the worlds inside our minds take precedence over reality. When we lose sight of the workings of the world around us, we become isolated in our minds, and our actions become corrupt.
The last century has shown us an acceleration of decay. Abusive governments, pollution, overpopulation, a proliferation of destruction weapons. Worst of all, in the supposed luxury of industrialized countries, our lives have descended into rigid competition for the ability to afford a life apart from violent dirty cities and predatory, perverse, parasitic fellow citizens. We are trying to outrun our own corruption.
We cannot rely on our political or economic systems to provide answers. The most destructive facet of corruption is that it pervades our assumptions of what is good and what is bad. When our illusions outweigh reality, we seek them in a desperate attempt to avoid the bad, but we create the bad because what we consider good is unrealistic. Corruption comes from within and cannot be isolated in a category.
At 7/3/06 01:17 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
What exactly is it you do that benefits society that I can't do better?
Well for one thing I'm better at recognizing reality than you are, thus I would make a better leader.
For instance I wouldn't keep up the false pretence that all the human races are exactly the same in all human attributes. The reality: There's a lot more diversity than we would like to admit and ignoring it is insanely destructive. That's why I support Nationalism a la the LNSGP.
At 7/3/06 01:09 PM, hhcash wrote: No one deserves to die.
If killing mediocres will increase the quality of my life and my society then I am all for it. The problem with Egalitarianism is that it breeds parasites who will drown out the people and socio-economic systems of worth. How do you stop this problem? Quite simply: Eugenics. Only insane people would want to destroy the whole just so that they don't have to face their own mortality (helping the mediocre survive is a form of death-denial because it gives us the illusion that death is really further away than it really is).
