Edits to post #25301095 by WahyaRanger
Edited at 2014-11-18 12:02:38
At 11/18/14 11:56 AM, malfunction19 wrote: Well yes but you get my point.
Let me put it this way, I lived to see the fall of the world's most prominent terrorist organization. I have no family in the military, and all in all, it didn't affect me so much. Yes, the US,
theoretically
was now safe from a man and group that slaid ~2000 people. Sure, WWII and the Soviet Union had more casualities, but compare Pearl Harbor to 9/11, and the endgames; Osama being killed and the nukes of Hiroshima.
I'd say killing one man was more of a victory that taking the lives of innocent, and even then, it wasn't that monumental of an event. Sure, some rednecks partied, but... It wasn't the focus point of an entire decade.
You feel me?
At 11/18/14 11:56 AM, malfunction19 wrote: Well yes but you get my point.
Let me put it this way, I lived to see the fall of the world's most prominent terrorist organization. I have no family in the military, and all in all, it didn't affect me so much. Yes, the US,
theoretically
was now safe from a man and group that slaid ~2000 people. Sure, WWII and the Soviet Union had more casualities, but compare Pearl Harbor to 9/11, and the endgames; Osama being killed and the nukes of Hiroshima & Nagasaki.
I'd say killing one man was more of a victory that taking the lives of innocent, and even then, it wasn't that monumental of an event. Sure, some rednecks partied, but... It wasn't the focus point of an entire decade.
You feel me?

