At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At least I know what Redskins really means and came from and didn't just make something up like a liberal would: this is you below basically
Furthermore I've been on Redskin forums asking and researching this and they say this really wasn't an issue up until Dan Snyder came into the picture. It's clearly some misinformation campaign, you can't take some word and just attach new meaning to it for your own agenda.
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
Ok, I had words here but I really gotta start here. I forgot liberals like this one can't read what I said about what Redskins actually means and just wants to jump on the bandwagon of misinformation. This you below:
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At least I know what Redskins really means and came from and didn't just make something up like a liberal would: this is you below basically
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At least I know what Redskins really means and came from and didn't just make something up like a liberal would: this is you below basically
Furthermore I've been on Redskin forums asking and researching this and they say this really wasn't an issue up until Dan Snyder came into the picture. It's clearly some misinformation campaign, you can't take some word and just attach new meaning to it for your own agenda.
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At least I know what Redskins really means and came from and didn't just make something up like a liberal would: this is you below basically
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
At 10/15/14 10:42 PM, coderchick94 wrote: You know I really can't understand why people don't seem to understand things like this when it should be obvious.
Why are sports team names racist when named after something referring to a native american?
Because the history behind it is hurtful to the group it represents. No one cares that the Celtics or the Knicks may represent a stereotype from that group of people because it wasn't meant that way.
However, when a group of people names a team based off of stereotypes that were largely seen as offensive to Native Americans, not to mention I am sure most Natives didn't agree with it since, you know, those trekking west were killing them by the thousands, it needs to be changed.
How you don't get this, I will never know.
Of course if you're not that serious about it, then please carry on.
And it begins, here's another liberal with a misinformation campaign bandwagon.(apparently I can't just post without text, so I'll keep it minimal, from here out just one word if possible, this just explaination)
At least I in life experience have asked and talked to many native Americans unlike you probably have. There's some that find it offensive. To pander to a 5% minority that think it's offensive is pretty god damn liberal and stupid.
Select between 5 monster racers, upgrade your monster skill and win the competition!
4.23 / 5.00 3,881 Views
Build most powerful forces, unleash hordes of monster and control your soldiers!
3.93 / 5.00 4,634 Views
© Copyright 1995-2014 Newgrounds, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
newgrounds.com — Your #1 online entertainment & artist community! All your base are belong to us.
