Score: 5
"(I don't like typing in this box)"
date: December 16, 2006
*Enters a neutral point of view*
Originality: 6, not a remake (that I've heard of), but nothing new.
Diversity: 3, Just not long enough to be diverse. Nothing really bad with that though.
Clarity: 7, Again, to me, the word "soft" is what I'm looking for. I can see this song isn't meant to be very "soft", and is going for the "not-soft" sound instead, but it seems a little to "not-soft" to be good.
Effort: 10, as always, this is what you deserve.
Overall: 5, Sorry, but this just doesn't connect with me.
Pros
~It starts off nicely, and is indeed the "soft" I am looking for.
~The drums are good, original enough to keep it interesting.
Cons
~The only real big thing I have against this is the primary instrument you use, it just grates on me, feeling like an out-of-tune electric guitar.
~It's bit repetative, but that's nothign big.
Author's Response:
thank you for realizeing my effort!
Originality: technically this is a remake of my own song so yes remae lol.
Diversity: its not long enough for ng, there is another 4 mins of it at six1studios
Clarity: i can agree that is a good point.
Effort: thank you!
Overall: aww man. well ya cant win em all, i know everyone wont be floacking to this song, but i love this heh. for people who like my music ^_^
the long ass intro was to get you to get used to the double beat, and you would htink its just a weirdo song woohoo.
i didnt like the clap n this one so i modified it in the final (at six1studios)
the other primary synth i used in the original sounded too gay noobish to me. i was going for the "bassforce feel" sorta heh.
repetative yes, i know i apologize
thanks for another longass review =D pce