Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
Sep 27, 2006 | 6:51 PM EDT
File Info
Song
3.6 MB
3 min 6 sec
Score
3.50 / 5.00

Licensing Terms

Please contact me if you would like to use this in a project. We can discuss the details.

Score:
Rated 3.50 / 5 stars
Plays & Downloads:
593 Plays | 231 Downloads
Share Links:
Genres:
Easy Listening - Classical
Tags:
None

Author Comments

More classical sounding than the first part. I just couldn't stop making music.

Reviews


MaestroRageMaestroRage

Rated 4.5 / 5 stars

Impressive

It is indeed more classical then the first, but I still feel that it is more ambiant then classical. This again I contribute to that cello.

The melody IS more emphasized, there IS more power behind it, but still I don't feel it is enough yet. Those long string notes towards the end screams ambiant to the core.

The percussional beats here were pretty fine, and I didn't really hear any off keys with the piano, who knows, maybe i'm just not paying attention to the right places.

The build up with the piano at the beginning was a good way to usher in the rest of the song, but once more, I must point out that the way it builds up, with a constant face, a similar arpeggiated chord says it is ambiant.

I wouldn't recommend the triangle ping thing with this song, I think this song is plenty full with it ^^.

That deep, oppressive piano notes i'm hearing, I felt really added a nice feel, a somewhat darker feel, but it was an enjoyable aspect.

Overall, I liked this one better then the first, because it is somewhat less ambiant, and has more to sink my teeth into. Awesome work, keep them coming!



BMC-AudioBMC-Audio

Rated 4 / 5 stars

pretty good..~

this song was ok...it got a little boring after a while with the same thing...this isnt really my kind of music ...although i do appreciate all the time and work that are put into these songs. but for me the same progression over and over with some added snare,kick, and cymbals...it just doesnt do it for me.

also the timing on the piano riff in the back ground was off. but it was an ok song over all.


Sir-Panda responds:

Well, it sounds the same because i didnt want the closer to break out in so many different beats. So keep in mind that this is an outro/closer.


boomsquadboomsquad

Rated 4.5 / 5 stars

hey hey

Alright imma list the problem i had with this first. There seemed to be a bit of fuzz at certain part where the sound begins to break up.

But other than that this was awesome. I like how you used classical sounds with modern progressions too.

The drums weren't a problem for me but I thought it may have been more of my kind of thing if the drums weren't there. But its not my music so it's all up to you.

Nice work buddy, I enjoyed it.

5/5