Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Date
07/27/2012
File Info
Song
3.8 MB
2 min 49 sec
Score
4.52 / 5.00

Related Content

You might also enjoy:

Licensing Terms

Attribution:
You must give credit to the artist.
Noncommercial:
You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless you make specific arrangements with the artist.
Share Alike:
If you alter, transform, or build upon this image, you may distribute the resulting creation only under a license identical to this one.
Score:
Rated 4.52 / 5 stars
Plays & Downloads:
2,206 Plays | 307 Downloads
Share Links:
Genres:
Electronic - Dance
Tags:
layers
sections
arpeggio
counterpoint

Author Comments

so, this is a bit of an exercise in layering multiple melodies

there are three melodic patterns and two of them have an arpeggiating structure

I introduce each one separately, in sections, and then combine them

I wouldn't consider this a finished piece, but I wouldn't call it a WIP either, since I am not planning on working on it anymore

in any case...

Honest votes and reviews are appreciated!

Reviews


ZennojenZennojen

Rated 5 / 5 stars July 29, 2012

Great structure, great pumping sound, great instruments, great everything! I deem it worthy of a full fledged 5 star rating. Very good! :)


People find this review helpful!

bobthecowbobthecow

Rated 5 / 5 stars July 28, 2012

Something new and exciting every time. It can be quite difficult to pull off multiple layers of melody like this without having them all blend together into one big mess, but you seem to have pulled it off flawlessly. I'm not sure if it was the post-mastering which separated them or just very skillful timing during production, but excellent job nonetheless. Very powerful sounds and catchy melodies, definitely try more songs like this in the future.


People find this review helpful!
OcularNebula responds:

Both!

The two arpeggio-based melodies sync somewhat together in rhythm, so it's easy to make the simultaneous notes be harmonic intervals (sixths and thirds, primarily), while the disparate bits fill in the gaps between, and then I also EQ each synth accentuating a particular frequency and reducing the frequency that the other synth accentuates, creating room for each other. Of course, they're all still within what I would consider a "high" frequency range.

I want to address the fact that I don't have a discrete "mastering" or "post-mastering" step that I go through for my tracks, opting to instead set up each individual synth in reference to what I have completed of the track at that point (since I know what function I want a particular synth to fulfill), and then to fine-tune it as I add more elements to the track. It's always a better idea to get each synth to as functional a level as possible, so you don't HAVE to resort to tweaking the master channel, as that is always less precise. A lot of it is intuitive (or, I suppose, it becomes intuitive after a while).

I don't know if you produce music, but to anyone reading - I feel like it's important not to get pigeonholed into methods, concepts, and techniques that are, in essence, unnecessary, and while there are certainly clutch concepts in music production that you simply cannot do without, there is also a fair amount of fluff. Whatever works best for you in a way that actually enhances your tracks and makes you happy is the way you should go with.


pmr213pmr213

Rated 5 / 5 stars July 28, 2012

Great like always.keep up the great work!


OcularNebula responds:

thanks!


AarocaAaroca

Rated 4.5 / 5 stars July 27, 2012

I think that this layering here is something you could definitely abuse in the future.
I also think that Emanuel Harper is an excellent dancer.

-Aaroca-
The Other Other God.


OcularNebula responds:

yeah, definitely

I mean, I've already done this sort of thing before, to some extent

watch him be a real ballerina

I don't think there's actually anyone even remotely famous named Emanuel Harper, though I could be wrong...