Score: 10

"Yes, it builds nicely"

by: NewAgeOfPower

date: January 15, 2008

Your music has raised my standards of judgement. Your newer music is much more complex and deep, but simplicity can be powerful on its own

Score: 10

"Nice"

by: Sin-Snakei

date: November 16, 2005

Pretty good, but then again, that's what I expected from you.

By the way, in the last review I posted (Sad Ending) you said something about Reason 3.0. What is that?

Sin

Score: 9

"You show great promise."

by: XGM-Zeth

date: November 4, 2005

Considering your age of 13, I think this show great promise. The song itself is really good, not out-standing, and could be improved alot.
But thats mostly with samples.

And most orchestral pieces/Classical pieces end with a great "BOOM" instead of fading out, it just seems alot more synthetic when doing that.

I think i made songs back when i was 12, but i wasnt nearly this good. My current age is 14, and trust me, by the time you are my age you will have improved alot and gotten new tricks up your sleeves.

As i've said earlier, you show great promise, and you only need to be polished by experience.

And the last instrument you had, sounded too digital to fit with a symphony.

With this program of yours, can you put reverb at the instruments? because i think that would really help the song alot.

Ok, I gave you a nice in-depth review, dont you think? :)

-Zeth-

Score: 9

"awsome man."

by: spawn28

date: October 25, 2005

i loved it, but the fade out is kind of a bore in this one, and its a little bit short.
What program do you use to make these by the way?

Score: 7

"Erk..."

by: Scarlatti

date: October 5, 2005

It's okay. I think you should try something other than a fadeout to end a piece. It's rather a copout when it is used for every piece. Also, I think you should try writing a piece that relies on its chords, rather than constant motion. What you do is useful, but you must be flexible as well.