{Dj-L} Nostalgia Remake


Date Submitted

10/05/2009 | 09:40PM EDT

File Information

Trance Song | 5.6 MB | 2 min 28 sec

Add Song to Favorites

Current Score

4.29 / 5.00

Score Rank: #9,884
Popularity Rank: #28,282

120 votes

824 listens

81 downloads

Click an icon to vote on this!

You are not logged in.

If you log in to vote, you could win $100!

Related Submissions

Submissions by Meonly70:

Users who liked this also enjoyed:

Licensing Terms

Commons Deed | Legal Code | ?

Download this song!

Attribution: You must give credit to the artist.

Noncommercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless you make specific arrangements with the artist under another license.

Share Alike: If you alter, transform, or build upon this music, you may distribute the resulting creation only under a license identical to this one.

Author Comments

My most recent song, remastered by DJ Derrick. I thought it was so much better that I am posting it separately with all the special touches he gave it, as credit :)

As you can see, it sounds a hell of a lot better, with a nice trance touch :P

http://yodamanjaro.newgro unds.com/ is his page. Very nice songs, has many signed. Check his stuff out.

Enjoy the new track :D

9 reviews | Log in to write a review | Share this!

The people have spoken

Average Score: 9.3 / 10

Score: 10
CrisisC0re

"Wow"

date: December 8, 2009

Good shit, sounds awesome, and alot better than the previous one :)

December 8, 2009

Author's Response:

Thank you, glad you liked it.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
Unrl

"Ironically.."

by: Unrl
date: October 26, 2009

The older, worse version won a Top 25? Weird.

Is that sidechaining I hear? =O
Mastering is cool, does that guy do it for free lol?

Nice gating at 1:15, awesome.
This is much better. I still would have liked to be longer though.
The lead at 2:00 - cool.. but I wouldn't really use it in this song. It comes in kind of abruptly too, which is random.

Still worth a ten.

October 27, 2009

Author's Response:

The guy doesn't do it for people at all, he just did this for me to give me an example of how I can improve.

True about the top scoring one and yes it is sidechaining. I didn't really make a buildup for the synth, but Derrick added that as well.

Thanks man :)

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 9
TheCadre

"Nice work!!"

date: October 26, 2009

I feels very smooth, the song just seems to flow.
Although I kind of feel like it's missing something, I can't exactly say what, though...

Nevertheless, good work!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 8
Whitesock

"Needs moar"

date: October 24, 2009

Great job, though with that new synth you could easily make that a break and then hit up the chorus for a final runthrough.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
FlightPattern

"Wow Great"

date: October 24, 2009

Hey this is so much better than the original.
You finally added some variety!
It's not just the same melody repeating over and over again.
Well...actually it is but all of the small changes you made throughout the song make up for it.

I don't really know if the synth you added around 2:00 was good or bad. I'll let you decide.

One thing I forgot to mention in my last review was that the bass was great as well.

Maybe you could give me advice on one of my songs sometime?

October 24, 2009

Author's Response:

Hey, glad you liked this one more! The changes were actually made by my friend DJ Derrick. You should check his page out, he has some good music, he scored top 30 this week too.

The synth gives it a more techno-ish feel. The guy makes the best synths I have heard. It was an example for me, showing me what I should add to my songs to make them sound better, and obviously, i should because a majority like this one more.

Just those small changes make a big difference.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!