unfortunitly
this is the second time I've listened to something of yours. Not a huge fan of your work but it does have a small taste that i do like. may be most of the time your work seems happy and Skippy.
Author Comments
This is my Piano Prelude No.1--Allegro in D Minor fixed and ready to be unleashed again. It sounds a lot clearer than the harpsichord version. :) Thank you jesusbandy for your suggestions! ^_^
SuperTonic64 responds:
Ocktober,
Well, everyone has their likes and their dislikes. Generally people enjoy the music I write, however, I am intrigued about what you dislike about it. If you could personal message me how you think I can improve my music, I will certainly take it into consideration.
Thanks for your honesty!
~Tiara
very classical
Yep, he's right. This would definitely be heard at a recital. Nice work!
(I'm a big fan of your works!)
lovely
i think it sounds nice. it's really pleasant on the ears. (:
yeah, like the comment below me, i think the harpsichord could've brought out a more classical sound to it. (:
SuperTonic64 responds:
Thanks! I really appreciate it. :D Yeah, I originally wrote this piece for harpsichord, but it didn't quite have the expression/dynamic quality I wanted! :D
Very Classic
Classic piano piece that you would otherwise hear at a recital. I think harpsichord would've been more bad ass though (with a good one)
In the terms of the genre "Classical" and mostly the precise writing technique, voicing, and theory you used. Gets a 5.
SuperTonic64 responds:
I originally wrote it for harpsichord, but the instrument can't get the dynamic quality that I was looking for. :D
Thanks for the review! I really love your works, and I'm happy you took the time to look at my stuff! ^_^
~Smartpoetic
Beautiful
May I add lyrics real soft ones?
SuperTonic64 responds:
You mean the development section? I don't know if that will work, to be honest. But thanks for asking! ^_^
Credits & Info
You might also enjoy…
SuperTonic64 Licensing Terms
Please contact me if you would like to use this in a project. We can discuss the details.
