Swirls
Credits & Info
- Views
- 68,859
- Score
- 4.28 / 5.00
- Date
- 06/17/2009
- Category
- Illustration
- File Info
- 800 x 658 px
- JPEG
- 357.3 kb
- Tags
- sex
- swirls
Share this submission?
Related Stuff
More art from this artist:
Licensing Terms
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions:
- Attribution:
- You must give credit to the artist.
- Noncommercial:
- You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless you make specific arrangements with the artist.
- No Derivative Works:
- You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
Author Comments
This was a sexually driven traditional piece I did a while ago I still like it
Reviews
Rated 5 / 5 stars Jan 5, 2012
well i like it...
its simple and good. I should frame it above my bed lol
Rated 5 / 5 stars Dec 31, 2011
Variety!
You are great with a variety of styles. That's a unique talent, and not often seen. I dont know what to expect, and thats a great thing! People get "too comfortable" with one set style of artwork and when something different pops up its "OMG" Great work! :D
Rated 5 / 5 stars Sep 28, 2011
Its GOOD!
It really stands out from your other art (in the good way) , just one thing.... The reviews, i dont get how people saying that they like it would be a "useless" review and how they see what they think is a penis is s "HELPFUL" Review ... wait?, im just ranting on now sorry to waste your time Ego. >-<
Rated 4 / 5 stars Apr 13, 2011
This was you?!
I probably only did not give this a 9 rating because I found it ridiculous how this was made by you! Granted, you're certainly not above making perverted stuff. All the lines and colors just seem so different! Well, at least you appear to be experimenting with a whole new style and most people seem to like it. I guess these people were supposed to be anthropomorphic personifications of swirls judging by the title. The shading with the red background is also good.
They really look similar but I can tell the one on the left is female as the lips seem more pronounced. For something "M", it actually doesn't have any depictions of private parts. They almost look bored. I guess it just goes to show that a person's sexual identity will drive them to make the weirdest things. Certainly not bad.
Rated 5 / 5 stars Feb 25, 2010
You should put a canvas effect on it
Then we could call it a classic. A masterpiece. I'm sure someone out there would love to buy your artwork. I've seen your earlier work (from years ago) and you've definitely progressed. So much, in fact, I'd wonder if it was even the same person drawing. Keep up your awesome work. I really enjoy it.